Abstract
The Canadian Index of Wellbeing (CIW) measures stability and change in the well-being of Canadians over time. Developed through a collaborative process and drawing upon valid and reliable data sources, the CIW monitors trends in well-being that allows citizens to advocate for change and for policy shapers to make informed, evidence-based decisions. Although originally intended to measure well-being at the national level, many communities have expressed considerable interest in assessing well-being locally. This chapter describes collaborative work with community partners to measure quality of life by using a Community Survey based on the CIW conceptual framework. We begin by describing the development of the CIW conceptual framework and measurement process. Then, we outline how the CIW framework has guided the development of a community well-being survey that provides timely, relevant, and locally accessible data where few such sources exist. Examples from survey results in three communities demonstrate how citizens’ well-being is affected by selected perceptual and situational factors identified by community partners. A discussion follows on how the survey has been used to initiate social change to promote well-being locally. The chapter concludes with some considerations of the limitations and possibilities of the community well-being survey approach along with future avenues for promoting policy change.
This quotation on the proof appears at the bottom of the page just above the contact information for the authors. It should appear in italics in a larger font just below the authors’ names at the top and before “Introduction”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Canadian Index of Wellbeing. (n.d.). What is wellbeing? Waterloo: Canadian Index of Wellbeing and University of Waterloo. Retrieved from https://uwaterloo.ca/canadian-index-wellbeing/wellbeing-canada/what-wellbeing
Canadian Policy Research Network. (2001a). Asking citizens what matters for quality of life in Canada. Report prepared for the Canadian Policy Research Networks. Results of Public Dialogue Process, Quality of Life Indicators Project. Ottawa: CPRN.
Canadian Policy Research Network. (2001b). Indicators of quality of life in Canada: A citizen’s prototype. Report prepared for the Canadian Policy Research Networks. Results of Public Dialogue Sessions and Prototype of National Indicators, Quality of Life Indicators Project. Ottawa: CPRN.
City of Guelph. (2014a). The Guelph difference: Guelph wellbeing. Discussion paper, November 2014. Retrieved from: https://uwaterloo.ca/canadian-index-wellbeing/sites/ca.canadian-index-wellbeing/files/uploads/files/guelph_wellbeing_discussion_paper_final_nov_2014.pdf
City of Guelph. (2014b, September). Food security in Guelph. Guelph wellbeing. Retrieved from: https://uwaterloo.ca/canadian-index-wellbeing/sites/ca.canadian-index-wellbeing/files/uploads/files/food_security_report.pdf
City of Guelph. (2014c, September). Social connectivity in Guelph. Guelph wellbeing. Retrieved from: https://uwaterloo.ca/canadian-index-wellbeing/sites/ca.canadian-index-wellbeing/files/uploads/files/social_connectivity_report.pdf
City of Guelph. (2014d, September). Physical connectivity in Guelph. Guelph wellbeing. Retrieved from: https://uwaterloo.ca/canadian-index-wellbeing/sites/ca.canadian-index-wellbeing/files/uploads/files/physical_connectivity_report.pdf
City of Guelph. (2014e, September). Affordable housing in Guelph. Guelph wellbeing. Retrieved from: https://uwaterloo.ca/canadian-index-wellbeing/sites/ca.canadian-index-wellbeing/files/uploads/files/affordable_housing_report.pdf
Community Foundations of Canada. (n.d.). 10 principles. Retrieved from http://www.cfc-fcc.ca/documents/10-PRINCIPLES-pf.pdf
Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 397–404.
Dolan, P., Layard, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective well-being for public policy: Recommendations on measures (Special Paper No. 23). London: Centre for Economic Performance.
FuseSocial. (2014). Wood Buffalo strategy roadmap. Retrieved from http://fusesocial.ca/cause-view/strategy-roadmap/
Hilbrecht, M., Smale, B., & Campbell, F. (2014). Building a story together: Enhancing local measures through a Community Foundation and Canadian Index of Wellbeing partnership. Paper presented at the Community Indicators Consortium Impact Summit, Washington, DC.
Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, pp. 36–41. Retrieved from http://www.ssireview.org/images/articles/2011_WI_Feature_Kania.pdf
Kuznets, S. (1934). National income, 1929–1932. 73rd US Congress, 2d Session, Senate Document no. 124, p. 7
Michalos, A., Smale, B., Labonté, R., Muharjarine, N., Scott, K., Moore, K., Swystun, L., … & Hyman, I. (2011). The Canadian index of wellbeing. Technical Report 1.0. Waterloo: Canadian Index of Wellbeing and University of Waterloo.
OECD (2104). Greening household behaviour: Overview from the 2011 survey – revised edition, OECD Studies on Environmental Policy and Household Behaviour. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264214651-en.
Phillips, K., Hilbrecht, M., & Smale, B. (2014). Civic engagement and community wellbeing in Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox & Addington (A Report Based on Results of the CIW Community Wellbeing Survey in KFL&A). Waterloo: Canadian Index of Wellbeing and University of Waterloo. 45 pp.
Prezza, M., Pacilli, M. G., Barbaranelli, C., & Zampatti, E. (2009). The MTSOCS: A multidimensional sense of community scale for local communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(3), 305–326.
Scott, K. (2010). Community vitality: A report of the Canadian Index of Wellbeing. Waterloo: Canadian Index of Wellbeing and the University of Waterloo.
Smale, B., & Hilbrecht, M. (2014). A profile of Wood Buffalo residents based on their level of wellbeing: A technical report for social prosperity Wood Buffalo and its partners. Waterloo: Canadian Index of Wellbeing and the University of Waterloo. 43 pp.
Statistics Canada. (2013a). Census subdivision of Guelph, CY – Ontario (Cat. No. 98-314-XWE2011004). Focus on Geography Series, 2011 Census. Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/fogs-spg/Facts-cma-eng.cfm?LANG=Eng&GK=CMA&GC=550
Statistics Canada. (2013b). Census subdivision of Kingston, Ontario. (Cat. No. 98-314-XWE2011004). Focus on Geography Series, 2011 Census. Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/fogs-spg/Facts-cma-eng.cfm?LANG=Eng&GK=CMA&GC=521
Statistics Canada. (2013c). Census agglomeration of Wood Buffalo, Alberta (Cat. No. 98-314-XWE2011004). Focus on Geography Series, 2011 Census. Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/fogs-spg/Facts-cma-eng.cfm?LANG=Eng&GK=CMA&GC=860
Taylor, A., Newberry, J., & Nicholson, M. (2011). A plan for wellbeing in Guelph (34 pp.). Retrieved from http://tamarackcommunity.ca/downloads/index/Guelph_Wellbeing_Plan_Report.pdf
Zywert, K. (2014). Social prosperity Wood Buffalo 2014 process report: Enabling systems change in Wood Buffalo’s social profit sector (70 pp.). Retrieved from http://www.socialprosperity.ca/sites/socialprosperity.ca/files/download_doc/SPWB%202014%20Process%20Report%20FINAL_0.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smale, B., Hilbrecht, M. (2017). From National to Local: Measuring Well-Being at the Community Level. In: Phillips, R., Wong, C. (eds) Handbook of Community Well-Being Research. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0878-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0878-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-0876-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-0878-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)