Skip to main content

Applied Benefit Transfer: An Australian and New Zealand Policy Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values

Part of the book series: The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources ((ENGO,volume 14))

Abstract

This chapter provides an introduction to and review of the use of benefit transfer approaches and data within Australasian policy making. The focus is on applications within the last two decades and the role of transfer methods within legal, policy and institutional structures. While there has been substantial interest in benefit transfer, the number of practical applications remains limited in both Australia and New Zealand . The limited pool of primary valuation studies and challenges in value transfer has meant that to date, understanding about the validity and reliability of benefit transfer and the development of protocols to guide its use are still limited. Nonetheless, recent major policy issues and controversies such as conservation of the Great Barrier Reef and management of water in the Murray-Darling Basin have led to an increase in applications of benefit transfer, and also to the potential for misuse. Included in this chapter is a discussion of the acceptance of benefit transfer approaches for various applications, the prevalence of benefit transfer, and the legal role of benefit transfers within Australasian policy analysis. The chapter will also highlight the potential for benefit transfer to make benefit- cost analysis more useful to policy makers and more easily evaluated within Australasian policy contexts. The need for more work to provide confidence around processes and results is assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACF (Australian Conservation Foundation). (2011). What’s a healthy Murray-Darling Basin worth to Australians? Analysis released on the 2nd of February 2011. Carlton, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACF (Australian Government). (2010). Best Practice Regulation Handbook. Australian Government, Canberra, at http://www.finance.gov.au.obpr/proposal/gov-requirements.html.

  • Bell, B., Cudby, C. & Yap, M. (2009, February). Establishing a benefits transfer database for biosecurity decision making on indigenous biodiversity. Paper presented at the 53rd Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Cairns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (1982). Valuing the existence of a natural ecosystem. Search, 13, 232–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (1996). The contingent valuation method: A Post-Kakadu assessment. Agenda, 3, 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2005). Australasian environmental economics: Contributions, conflicts and ‘cop-outs’. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 49, 243–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., & Blamey, R. (Eds.). (2001). The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation. Cheltenham, UK and Northhampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., Dumsday, R. & Gillespie, R. (2008a). Analysing options for the River Red Gum Forests along the Murray River. Paper presented at the 52nd Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Conference, Queenstown, NZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., Dumsday, R., Howell, G., Lloyd, C., Sturgess, N., & Van Raalte, L. (2008b). The economic value of improved environmental health in Victorian Rivers. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 15, 138–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, R. K., Rolfe, J. C., Bennett, J. W. & Morrison, M. D. (1997). Environmental choice modelling: Issues and qualitative insights. Choice Modelling Research Report No 4, University College, University of New South Wales, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, R., Rolfe, J., Bennett, J., & Morrison, M. (2000). Valuing remnant vegetation in Central Queensland using choice modelling. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 44, 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P., Guria, J., & Ballingall, J. (2009). The Value of Air Quality Standards: Review And Update of Cost Benefit Analysis of National Environmental Standards on Air Quality. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand Institute of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2006a). Handbook of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Australian Government, Canberra, at: http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/finance-circulars/2006/docs/Handbook_of_CB_analysis.pdf.

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2006b) Introduction to cost-benefit analysis and alternative methodologies. Australian Government, Canberra, at: http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/finance-circulars/2006/docs/Intro_to_CB_analysis.pdf.

  • Concu, G. (2007). Investigating distance effects on environmental values: A choice modelling approach. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 51, 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, B. (1965). The Northern Myth: A Study of the Physical and Economic Limits to Agricultural and Pastoral Development in Northern Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobes, L. (2008). A century of Australian cost benefit analysis. Working paper, Department of Finance and Deregulation, Canberra, at: http://www.finance.gov.au/obpr/docs/Working-paper-1-Leo-Dobes.pdf (accessed July 24, 2012).

  • Dobes, L., & Bennett, J. W. (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: Good enough for government work? Agenda, 16, 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, R., & Bennett, J. (2013). Willingness to pay for kerbside recycling in Brisbane, Australia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56, 362–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, R. J. (1974). An economic evaluation of the Rakaia fishery as a recreational resource. MAgSci thesis. Christchurch: University of Canterbury (Lincoln College).

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D., & Gillespie, R. (2002). Guidelines for Economic Effects and Evaluation for Eia. Sydney: Prepared for New South Wales Department of Urban Affairs and Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, G. N. (n.d.). New Zealand Non-Market Valuation Database. http://www2.lincoln.ac.nz/nonmarketvaluation/.

  • Kerr, G. N. (2009). Statement of Evidence in Chief of Dr Geoffrey Neville Kerr in the Environment Court at Christchurch under the Resource Management Act 1991 in the matter of Appeals to the Environment Court under Section 120 of the Act between Garth William Dovey, Lower Waitaki River Management Society Incorporated, Te Runanga O Ngai Tahu, Ngai Tahu-Mamoe Fisher People Incorporated, Waitaki Protection Trust, Appellants and Canterbury Regional Council, Respondent and Meridian Energy Limited, Applicant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, G. N., & Sharp, B. M. H. (2006). Transferring mitigation values for small streams. In J. Rolfe & J. Bennett (Eds.), Transferring Environmental Values from Choice Modelling Applications (pp. 136–163). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, G. N., & Sharp, B. M. H. (2008a). Evaluating off-site mitigation using choice modelling. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 52, 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, G. N. & Sharp, B. M. H. (2008b). The impact of wilding trees on indigenous biodiversity: A choice modelling study. AERU Research Report No. 303. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, K. & Bennett, J. (2009). Scale and scope effects on communities’ values for environmental improvements in the Namoi Catchment: A choice modelling approach. Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Report No. 42, at: http://www.crawford.anu.edu.au/research_units/eerh/publications/.

  • Miller, T. R & Guria, J. (1991). The value of statistical life in New Zealand market research on road safety. Land Transport Division, Ministry of Transport, Wellington, at: http://nzier.org.nz/publications/fix-flawed-values-of-statistical-life-and-life-years-to-get-better-policy-outcomes#sthash.Dbej18f2.dpuf.

  • Morrison, M., & Bennett, J. (2004). Valuing New South Wales rivers for use in benefit transfer. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 48, 591–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M., Bennett, J., Blamey, R., & Louviere, J. (2002). Choice modelling and tests of benefit transfer. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M., & Hatton McDonald, D. (2010). Economic Valuation of Environmental Benefits in the Murray-Darling Basin. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra: Report prepared for the Murray-Darling Basin Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Treasury. (2007). NSW Government Guidelines for Economic Appraisal. Sydney: New South Wales Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Treasury. (2005). Cost benefit analysis primer. New Zealand Government, Wellington, at: http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/planning/costbenefitanalysis/primer/cba-primer-v12.pdf (accessed 24th of July, 2012).

  • New Zealand Treasury. (2009). Regulatory Impact Analysis Handbook. New Zealand Government, Wellington, at: http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/regulatory/impactanalysis/ria-handbk-nov09.pdf (accessed 9th of September, 2012).

  • Oxford Economics. (2009). Valuing the effects of Great Barrier Reef bleaching. Report prepared for the Great Barrier Reef Foundation, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2012). Regulatory impact analysis: Benchmarking. Draft Report. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Government (Environmental Protection Agency). (2003). Techniques for environmental economic valuations. Information sheet, Environmental Impact Assessment. Brisbane: Queensland Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. & Cleland, J. (2010). Comparing scientist and public preferences for conserving environmental systems: A case of the Kimberley’s Tropical waterways and wetlands. Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Report No. 80, at: http://www.crawford.anu.edu.au/research_units/eerh/publications/.

  • Rogers, A. & Cleland, J. (2011). Conserving biodiversity in the Southwest Australia ecoregion: The policy implications of scientist and community values. Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Report No. 91, at: http://www.crawford.anu.edu.au/research_units/eerh/publications/.

  • Rolfe, J. (2010). Valuing deductions in water extractions from ground water basins with benefit transfer: The Great Artesian Basin in Australia. Water Resources Research, 46, W06301. doi:10.1029/2009WR008458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, J., & Bennett, J. (2002). Assessing rainforest conservation demands. Economic Analysis and Policy, 32, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, J., & Bennett, J. (Eds.). (2006). Choice Modelling and the Transfer of Environmental Values. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, J., Bennett, J., & Louviere, J. (2002). Stated values and reminders of substitute goods: Testing for framing effects with choice modelling. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 46, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, J., & Brouwer, R. (2013). Design effects in a meta-analysis of river health choice experiments in Australia. Journal of Choice Modelling, 5, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, J., Loch, A., & Bennett, J. (2006). Testing benefit transfer with water resources in central Queensland, Australia. In J. Rolfe & J. Bennett (Eds.), Choice Modelling and the Transfer of Environmental Values (pp. 112–135). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2008). Testing for differences in benefit transfer values between state and regional frameworks. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 52, 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2012a). Distance decay functions for iconic assets: Assessing national values to protect the health of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Environmental and Resource Economics, 53, 347–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2012b). Testing benefit transfer of reef protection values between local case studies: The Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Ecological Economics, 81, 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, I. G., & Elliot, M. (2005). Environmental Impact Assessment In Australia: Theory and Practice (4th ed.). Sydney: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bueren, M., & Bennett, J. W. (2004). Towards the development of a transferable set of value estimates for environmental attributes. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 48, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windle, J., & Rolfe, J. C. (2012). Assessing the Values of Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services in the Lake Macquarie City Council Area. New South Wales, February: Report prepared for the Lake Macquarie City Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren, J. & Barrell, K. (2010). The costs of injury in New Zealand and methods for prioritizing resource allocation: A background the briefing paper to inform evaluation of the New Zealand Injury Prevention Strategy. New Zealand Injury Prevention Secretariat, Accident Compensation Corporation, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, K. K., Garnett, S. T., & Straton, A. (2010). Trade-offs between development, culture and conservation: Willingness to pay for tropical river management among urban Australians. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 2519–2528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Rolfe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rolfe, J., Bennett, J., Kerr, G. (2015). Applied Benefit Transfer: An Australian and New Zealand Policy Perspective. In: Johnston, R., Rolfe, J., Rosenberger, R., Brouwer, R. (eds) Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9930-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics