Skip to main content

Optimization and Resilience in Natural Resources Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adaptive Management of Social-Ecological Systems
  • 1965 Accesses

Abstract

We consider the putative tradeoff between optimization and resilience in the management of natural resources, using a framework that incorporates different sources of uncertainty that are common in natural resources management. We address one-time decisions, and then expand the decision context to the more complex problem of iterative decision making. For both cases we focus on two key sources of uncertainty: partial observability of system state and uncertainty as to system dynamics. Optimal management strategies will vary considerably depending on the timeframe being considered and the amount and quality of information that is available to characterize system features and project the consequences of potential decisions. But in all cases an optimal decision making framework, if properly identified and focused, can be useful in recognizing sound decisions. We argue that under the conditions of deep uncertainty that characterize many resource systems, an optimal decision process that focuses on robustness does not automatically induce a loss of resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellman, R. (1957). Dynamic programming. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R., & Dreyfus, S. (1962). Applied dynamic programming. Princeton: Princeton ­University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Haim, Y. (2006). Info-gap decision theory: Decisions under severe uncertainty (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas, D. P. (2007). Dynamic programming and optimal control (Vols. 1 and 2, 3rd ed.). ­Belmont: Athena Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgman, M. (2005). Risks and decisions for conservation and environmental management. ­Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., Brock, W. A., & Ludwig, D. (2002). Collapse, learning and renewal. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J., Peterson, G. D., Gardner, T. A., Gordon, L. J., Fazey, I., Elmqvist, T., Felton, A., Folke, C., & Dovers, S. (2009). Integrating resilience thinking and optimization for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 549–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. S., & Keeney, R. L. (2002). Making smarter environmental decisions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38, 1601–1612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., & Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 10, 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. (2003). Optimal control theory for applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L., & Cassandra, A. R. (1998). Planning and acting in partially ­observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence, 101, 99–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangas, A., Kangas, J., & Kurttila, M. (2010). Decision support for forest management. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempert, R. J., & Collins, M. T. (2007). Managing the risk of uncertain threshold response: ­Comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches. Risk Analysis, 27, 1009–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M. A. (2007). Bayesian methods for ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. D., Carpenter, S. R., & Brock, W. A. (2003). Uncertainty and the management of multistate systems: An apparently rational route to collapse. Ecology, 84, 1403–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polasky, S., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., & Keeler, B. (2011). Decision-making under great ­uncertainty: Environmental management in an era of global change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26, 398–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, H. M., Ben-Haim, Y., Langford, B., Wilson, W. G., Lunberg, P., Andleman, S. J., & ­Burgman, M. A. (2005). Robust decision making under sever uncertainty for conservation management. Ecological Applications, 15, 1471–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runge, M. C. (2011). An introduction to adaptive management for threatened and endangered ­species. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, 2, 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenk, T., & Franklin, A. (Eds.). (2001). Modeling in natural resource management: ­Development, interpretation, and application. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic, S. P. (2009). Managing water resources: Methods and tools for a systems approach. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniedovich, M. (2011). Dynamic programming: Foundations and principles (2nd ed.) Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengel, R. F. 1994. Optimal control and estimation. New York: Dover Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a ­changing world. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J. (1986). Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K. (2001). Uncertainty, learning, and optimization in wildlife management. ­Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 8, 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K. (2009). Markov decision processes in natural resources management: ­Observability and uncertainty. Ecological Modelling, 220, 830–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K. (2011a). Adaptive resource management and the value of information. Ecological Modelling, 222, 3429–3436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K. (2011b). Resolving structural uncertainty in natural resources management using POMDP approaches. Ecological Modelling, 222, 1092–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K., Nichols, J. D., & Conroy, M. J. (2002). Analysis and management of animal populations. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byron K. Williams .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, B., Johnson, F. (2015). Optimization and Resilience in Natural Resources Management. In: Allen, C., Garmestani, A. (eds) Adaptive Management of Social-Ecological Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9682-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics