Skip to main content

An Integration Framework for Clinical Decision Support Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ubiquitous Computing Application and Wireless Sensor

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 331))

Abstract

Clinical Decision Support (CDS) applications have been widely recognized for improving health care quality and medical knowledge translation. However, its adoption and utilization in a real clinical environment is still subject to many factors, an important one of which is the lack of mechanism to easily integrate these applications to clinical workflow. This paper designs and develops an extensible CDS application integration and management system framework. This framework achieves interoperability between Clinical Information System (CIS) and CDS applications at two levels under predefined integration protocols; and through a mechanism of registration, management and delivery, various CDS applications can be delivered to targeted scenarios and executed in a context-aware way. This framework was validated in real clinical environment, and proved to be effective in both integration and interoperability. Meanwhile, targeted CDS application delivery further facilitates CDS in clinical promotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF (2005) Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 330:765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sittig DF, Wright A, Osheroff JA, Middleton B, Teich JM, Ash JS, Campbell E, Bates DW (2008) Grand challenges in clinical decision support. J Biomed Inform 41:387–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu S, Chaudhry B, Wang J, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, Shekelle PG (2006) Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 144:742–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Osheroff JA, Teich JM, Middleton B, Steen EB, Wright A, Detmer DE (2007) A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu J, Wyatt JC, Altman DG (2006) Decision tools in health care: focus on the problem, not the solution. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 6:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawamoto K, Lobach DF (2007) Proposal for fulfilling strategic objectives of the US roadmap for national action on decision support through a service-oriented architecture leveraging HL7 services. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright A, Sittig DF (2008) SANDS: a service-oriented architecture for clinical decision support in a national health information network. J Biomed Inform 41:962–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolfinger R, Dhungana D, Prähofer H, Mössenböck H (2006) A component plug-in architecture for the. NET platform, in modular programming languages. Springer, Berlin, pp 287–305

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fransen J, Creemers M, Van Riel P (2004) Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: agreement of the disease activity score (DAS28) with the ARA preliminary remission criteria. Rheumatology 43:1252–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawamoto K, Del Fiol G, Strasberg HR, Hulse N, Curtis C, Cimino JJ, Rocha BH, Maviglia S, Fry E, Scherpbier HJ (2010) Multi-national, multi-institutional analysis of clinical decision support data needs to inform development of the HL7 virtual medical record standard. In: AMIA annual symposium proceedings, vol 2010. American Medical Informatics Association, p 377

    Google Scholar 

  11. Del Fiol G, Huser V, Strasberg HR, Maviglia SM, Curtis C, Cimino JJ (2012) Implementations of the HL7 context-aware knowledge retrieval (“infobutton”) standard: challenges, strengths, limitations, and uptake. J Biomed Inform 45:726–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou L, Hongsermeier T, Boxwala A, Lewis J, Kawamoto K, Maviglia S, Gentile D, Teich JM, Rocha R, Bell D (2013) Structured representation for core elements of common clinical decision support interventions to facilitate knowledge sharing. In: MEDINFO 2013: proceedings of the 14th world congress on medical and health informatics, vol 192. IOS Press, p 195

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the National High-tech R&D Program (2012AA02A601) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (30900329).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao-min Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zheng, X., Zhang, Ys., Huang, Zz., Jia, Z., Duan, Hl., Li, Hm. (2015). An Integration Framework for Clinical Decision Support Applications. In: Park, J., Pan, Y., Chao, HC., Yi, G. (eds) Ubiquitous Computing Application and Wireless Sensor. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 331. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9618-7_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9618-7_55

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9617-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9618-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics