Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Examining Organizational Value Co-creation Behavior from the Perspective of Service Science

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Future Information Technology - II

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 329))

Abstract

S-D logic is a more robust framework for service science than the traditional goods-dominant (G-D) logic that emphasizes the importance of operant resources and value co-creation. This study examines the dynamic nature of organizational value co-creation behavior by DEMATEL-based ANP. Major research findings can be expected to provide helpful guidance for the effective promotion of organizational value co-creation behavior to leverage the operant resources to their maximum potentiality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bandura A (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 37(2):122–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bartol KM, Srivastava A (2002) Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward systems. J Leadersh Organ Stud 9(1):64–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bock GW, Kim YG (2002) Breaking the myths of rewards: an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Inf Res Manage J (IRMJ) 15(2):14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bock GW, Zmud RW, Kim YG, Lee JN (2005) Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Q 29(1):87–111

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bostrom RP, Heinen JS (1977) MIS problems and failures: a sociotechnical perspective part I: the cause. MIS Q 1(3):17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cabrera EF, Cabrera A (2005) Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. Int J Hum Res Manage 16(5):720–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen F-H et al (2011) A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. Int J Hospitality Manage 30(4):908–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Compeau D, Higgins CA, Huff S (1999) Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Q 23(2):145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davenport TH, Prusak L (2000) Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Denison DR (1996) What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Acad Manag Rev 21(3):619–654

    Google Scholar 

  13. Foss NJ, Pedersen T (2002) Transferring knowledge in MNCs: the role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. J Int Manag 8(1):49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jarvenpaa SL, Staples DS (2000) The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants. J Strateg Inf Syst 9(2):129–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaya N, Koc E, Topcu D (2010) An exploratory analysis of the influence of human resource management activities and organizational climate on job satisfaction in Turkish banks. Int J Hum Res Manage 21(11):2031–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Litwin GH, Stringer Jr RA (1968) Motivation and organizational climate. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lusch RF et al (2007) Competing through service: insights from service-dominant logic. J Retail 83(1):5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lusch RF et al (2008) Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: contributions from service-dominant logic. IBM Syst J 47(1):5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Northcutt N, McCoy D (2004) Interactive qualitative analysis: a systems method for qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  20. Organ DW (1988) Organizational citizenship behavior: the good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Company, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ormrod JE (2006) Essentials of educational psychology. Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schulte M, Ostroff C, Shmulyian S, Kinicki A (2009) Organizational climate configurations: relationships to collective attitudes, customer satisfaction, and financial performance. J Appl Psychol 94(3):618–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Strauss A, Corbin J (2007) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor WA, Wright GH (2004) Organizational readiness for successful knowledge sharing: challenges for public sector managers. Inf Res Manage J (IRMJ) 17(2):22–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Williams LJ, Anderson SE (1991) Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. J Manage 17(3):601–617

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wood R, Bandura A (1989) Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Acad Manag Rev 14(3):361–384

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123, University Road, Section 3, Douliou, 64002, Yunlin, Taiwan, ROC

    Huan-Ming Chuang & Chyuan-Yuh Lin

Authors
  1. Huan-Ming Chuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chyuan-Yuh Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chyuan-Yuh Lin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Seoul National University of Science and Technology (SeoulTech), Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

    James J. (Jong Hyuk) Park

  2. Department of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Yi Pan

  3. Digital Media Engineering, Anyang University, Anyang, Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

    Cheonshik Kim

  4. Information & Communication Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Yun Yang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chuang, HM., Lin, CY. (2015). Examining Organizational Value Co-creation Behavior from the Perspective of Service Science. In: Park, J., Pan, Y., Kim, C., Yang, Y. (eds) Future Information Technology - II. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 329. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9558-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9558-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9557-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9558-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation