Skip to main content

The Intrinsic Value of Musical Experience. A Rethinking: Why and How?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy of Music Education Challenged: Heideggerian Inspirations

Part of the book series: Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education ((LAAE,volume 15))

  • 1384 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I will discuss the following questions: What characterizes a thinking about music which will make talking about ‘the value of music in itself’ possible and meaningful today? And why is it important to relate to this kind of idea in music education as well as in modern society in general?

Central to my investigations is Martin Heidegger’s thinking in The Origin of the Work of Art concerning the differences between things, utility articles and artworks, and Hannah Arendt’s discussions in The Human Condition concerning our modern oblivion of the differences between the three kinds of human activities; labor, work and action. I will even relate to Max Weber’s discussion of the character of modern Western rationality and how it has been developed, as well as the Aristotelian concepts poiesis and praxis, and the Kantian concepts pragmatic and practical actions.

I argue that music as a product and object in the outer world cannot be said to have a value in itself. Music as an object is a means to musical experience. Musical experience however is not a product, it is action; a human activity which has a value in itself. This value is linked to thinking and reflection, actions which are related to the Aristotelian concept of happiness in the long run (eudaimonia). I think that this line of thinking of musical experience as action is a possibility for a philosophy of music education to transcend instrumentalism and technical rationality. It’s a possibility for those who no longer want to accept the worshiping of instrumental reason and technical rationality as the one and only possible form of rationality, and the denial of human freedom which goes together with it. This type of thinking contributes to a fundamental critique of what seems to be a sort of ‘totalitarian’ economical and commercial ideology in today’s educational and cultural politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Philip V. Bohlman’s discussion on ontologies of music. What kind of ‘thing’ or ‘not-thing’ is music (Bohlman 1998)?

  2. 2.

    See for example Thomas A. Regelski (1998) and Wayne D. Bowman (2005) for discussions on music education and the Aristotelian concept of praxis.

  3. 3.

    This may sound quite close to Christopher Small’s concept “musicking” (Small 1998) and even to David Elliott’ concept “musicing” (Elliott 1995). And maybe to a certain extent it is. I will however not discuss these concepts in relation to Arendt’s concept of action in this chapter.

  4. 4.

    See for example Peter Kivy (2002, Chap. 11) for a discussion on music as “works”.

References

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (2003). Thinking and moral considerations. A lecture. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Responsibility and judgment (pp. 159–189). New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1999). Den nikomakiske etikk [Nicomachean ethics]. Bokklubbens Kulturbibliotek. Oslo: Bokklubben Dagens Bøker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlman, P. V. (1998). Ontologies of music. In N. Cook & M. Erverist (Eds.), Rethinking music (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, W. D. (2005). The limits and grounds of music praxialism. In D. Elliott (Ed.), Praxial music education: Reflections and dialogues (pp. 52–78). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. (1987). The Romantic ethic and the spirit of modern consumerism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, N. (1998). Music. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H., & Kelly, S. D. (2011). All things shining. Reading the Western classics to find meaning in a secular age. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (2009). Reason, faith and revolution. Reflections on the God debate. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. (1995). Music matters. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosse, J. (2011). Essay. Oslo: Samlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1981). The order of the discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text. A post-structuralist reader. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1954). Vorträge und Aufsätze. Stuttgart: Verlag Günther Neske.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Die Technik und die Kehre. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2002a). The origin of the Work of Art. In Off the beaten track (pp. 1–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2002b). Nietzsches Word “God is Dead”. In Off the beaten track (pp. 157–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, P. (2011). The next Christendom: The coming of global Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1999). Grundlæggelse af moralens metafysikk [Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten; und Kritik der praktischen Vernuft, 1838]. Copenhagen: FilosofiBiblioteket–Reitzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivy, P. (2002). Introduction to a philosophy of music. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, L. (2002). Musical meaning. Toward a critical history. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maritain, J. (1961). Kunstnerens ansvar [The responsibility of the artist]. Oslo: Cappelens upopulære skrifter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Øverenget, E. (2003). Hannah Arendt. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Øverenget, E. (2012). Homo Faber. Om mål og mening [Homo Faber. On purpose and meaning]. In Ø. Varkøy (Ed.), Om nytte og unytte [On usefulness and uselessness] (pp. 29–40). Oslo: Abstrakt Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pio, F. (2012). Introduktion af Heidegger til de pædagogiske fag [Introdcuction of Heidegger to pedagogics]. In F. Nielsen (Ed.), Musikpædagogiske Studier, [Music educational studies] bd. 4. Forskningsenhed Musikpædagogik. DPU, AU 2012. Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pio, F., & Varkøy, Ø. (2012). A reflection on musical experience as existential experience: An ontological turn. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 20(2) (Fall 2012), 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regelski, T. A. (1998). The Aristotelian bases of praxis for music and music education as praxis. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 6(1) (Spring 1998), 22–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2004). The McDonaldization of society. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2010). Enchanting a disenchanted world. Continuity and change in the cathedrals of consumption. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Røyseng, S. (2012). Den gode kunsten [The good art]. In Ø. Varkøy (Ed.), Om nytte og unytte [On usefulness and uselessness] (pp. 59–78). Oslo: Abstrakt Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røyseng, S., & Varkøy, Ø. (2014). What is music good for? A dialogue on technical and ritual rationality. ACT. Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education, 13(1), 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, C. (1998). Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening. Hanover: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varkøy, Ø. (2001). Musikk for alt (og alle) [Music for everything (and everybody)]. Dr. dissertation Oslo: University of Oslo, Department of Musicology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varkøy, Ø. (2002). Music – ‘useful tool’ or ‘useless happiness’? Ideas about music in Norwegian general education. In I. M. Hanken et al. (Eds.), Research in and for higher music education. Festschrift for Harald Jørgensen (pp. 121–134). Oslo: Norges musikkhøgskole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varkøy, Ø. (2003). Musikk – strategi og lykke [Music – strategy and happiness]. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varkøy, Ø. (2006). Philosophies of humankind. In M. Laitinen et al. (Eds.), Finnish Journal of Music Education, nr. 1 – 2006, pp. 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varkøy, Ø. (2007). Instrumentalism in the field of music education. Are we all humanists? Philosophy of Music Education Review, 15(1) (Spring 2007), 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varkøy, Ø. (2012). “…nytt liv av daude gror”. Om å puste nytt liv i døde talemåter [To breathe new life into dead sayings]. In Ø. Varkøy (Ed.), Om nytte og unytte [On usefulness and uselessness] (pp. 41–58). Oslo: Abstrakt Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varkøy, Ø. (2013). Technical rationality, techne and music education. In E. Georgii-Hemming, P. Burnard, & S.-E. Holgersen (Eds.), Professional knowledge in music teacher education (pp. 39–50). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2011). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizek, S. (2008). The absolute fragile. Or why the Christian legacy is worth fighting for? London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizek, S. (2011). Living in the end times. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Øivind Varkøy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Varkøy, Ø. (2015). The Intrinsic Value of Musical Experience. A Rethinking: Why and How?. In: Pio, F., Varkøy, Ø. (eds) Philosophy of Music Education Challenged: Heideggerian Inspirations. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9319-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics