Abstract
Our world is a world that exists in space, and a world without space is literally inconceivable. Given this basic truth, it is clear that living in the world requires spatial functioning of some kind. Being creative in this world, and designing new tools and new habitats, probably requires even higher levels of spatial functioning. And people vary in their levels of spatial ability. What do these facts mean for the field of design? There are certain obvious practical questions. For example, should design schools accept only applicants who test high in spatial ability, following the lead of dental schools, which assess spatial thought on the Dental Admissions Test or with practical exercises in assignments such as tooth modeling? Or should design schools strive to enhance the spatial ability of anyone with the desire to do creative design, following the lead of selection committees for surgical residencies, which do not assess spatial ability in any way? The latter course is arguably supported by evidence (to be discussed later) showing that spatial skill is malleable. As another example of a practical question for design, consider what designers should or could know about the potential users of a product. What kinds and levels of spatial abilities should they assume that users will have? How would they be able to predict when a new tool will be too hard to master for many users, or when a building design will result in an environment in which many people easily get lost?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balcomb F, Newcombe NS, Ferrara K (2009) Convergence and divergence in representational systems: place learning and language in toddlers. In Taatgen N et al (eds) Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp 596–601
Boyer TW, Levine SC (under review) Child proportional scaling: is 1/3 = 2/6 = 3/9 = 4/12?
Boyer T, Levine SC, Huttenlocher J (2008) Development of proportional reasoning: where young children go wrong. Dev Psychol 44:1478–1490
Carroll J (1993) Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factoranalytic studies. Cambridge University, New York
Chatterjee A (2008) The neural organization of spatial thought and language. Semin Speech Lang 29:226–238
Fisher K, Nash B, Hirsh-Pasek K, Newcombe N, Golinkoff R (2009) Breaking the mold: altering preschoolers’ concepts of geometric shapes. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Denver, Colorado (April, 2009)
Forbus K, Nielsen P, Faltings B (1991) Qualitative spatial reasoning: the clock project. Artif Intell 51(1–3):417–471
Freksa C, Barkowsky T, Klippel A (1999) Spatial symbol systems and spatial cognition: a computer science perspective on perception-based symbol processing. Behav Brain Sci 22:616–617
Frick A, Newcombe NS (in prep.) Development of spatial scaling abilities. Manuscript in preparation
Gentner D, Lovett A, Smith L (in preparation) Tests of children’s analogical ability
Harris J, Newcombe N (2010) Measuring spatial visualization through folding. Poster session presented at the inter-Science of Learning Center Student and Post-doc Conference, Boston
Heckman JJ (2006) Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science 312:1900–1902
Hegarty M, Waller DA (2005) Individual differences in spatial abilities. In: Shah P, Miyake A (eds) The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking. Cambridge University, New York, pp 121–169
Hegarty M, Crookes RD, Dara-Abrams D, Shipley TF (in press) Do all science disciplines rely on spatial abilities? Preliminary evidence from self-report questionnaires. To appear in Christian Freksa and Nora S. Newcombe (eds) Spatial Cognition V. Learning, Reasoning, and Talking 5 about Space, International Conference Spatial Cognition 2010, Portland, USA. Proceedings Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer
Hegarty M, Montello DR, Richardson AE, Ishikawa T, Lovelace K (2006) Spatial abilities at different scales: individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence 34:151–176
Holden M, Curby K, Newcombe NS, Shipley TF (in press) A category adjustment approach to memory for spatial location in natural scenes. J Exp Psychol: Learn, Mem Cogn
Huttenlocher J, Presson CC (1973) Mental rotation and the perspective problem. Cogn Psychol 4:277–299
Huttenlocher J, Hedges LV, Vevea JL (2000) Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? J Exp Psychol Gen 129:1–22
Ishikawa T, Montello DR (2006) Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cogn Psychol 52:93–129
Kali Y, Orion N (1996) Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. J Res Sci Teach 33:369–391
Kastens KA, Ishikawa T (2006) Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: a cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields. In: Manduca CA, Mogk DW (eds) Earth and mind: how geologists think and learn about the Earth. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 53–76
Kozhevnikov M, Hegarty M (2001) A dissociation between object-manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Mem Cogn 29:745–756
Kozhevnikov M, Hegarty M, Mayer RE (2002) Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: evidence for two types of visualizers. Cogn Instr 20:47–77
Kozhevnikov M, Kosslyn S, Shephard J (2005) Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style. Mem Cogn 33:710–726
Kozhevnikov M, Motes M, Rasch B, Blajenkova O (2006) Perspective-taking vs. mental rotation transformations and how they predict spatial navigation performance. Appl Cogn Psychol 20:397–417
Levine SC, Huttenlocher J, Taylor A, Langrock A (1999) Early sex differences in spatial skill. Dev Psychol 35:940–949
Levine SC, Vasilyeva M, Lourenco SF, Newcombe NS, Huttenlocher J (2005) Socio-economic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skills. Psychol Sci 16:841–845
Linn MC, Peterson AC (1985) Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 56:1479–1498
Loewenstein J, Gentner D (2001) Spatial mapping in preschoolers: close comparisons facilitate far mappings. J Cogn Dev 2:189–219
Lourenco SF, Levine SC (2009) Location representation following early unilateral brain injury: Evidence of distinct deficits and degrees of plasticity. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Denver, Colorado (April, 2009)
Palmer SE (1978) Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In: Rosch E, Lloyd BB (eds) Cognition and categorization. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 259–303
Ratliff KR, McGinnis CR, Levine SC (2010) The development and assessment of cross-sectioning ability in young children. Paper submitted to the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Portland, OR (August, 2010)
Schinazi VR, Epstein RA, Nardi D, Newcombe NS, Shipley TF (2009) The acquisition of spatial knowledge in an unfamiliar campus environment. Psychonomic Society. November 2009, Boston
Shipley T, Manduca C, Resnick I, Schilling C (2009) Expertise in spatial visualization: can geologists reverse time? Psychonomic Society, Boston
Uttal DH, Meadow N, Hand L, Lewis A, Warren C, Newcombe NS (under review) Spatial training: what works, for whom and for how long?
Wai J, Lubinski D, Benbow CP (2009) Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over fifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. J Educ Psychol 101:817–835
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Newcombe, N., Shipley, T. (2015). Thinking About Spatial Thinking: New Typology, New Assessments. In: Gero, J. (eds) Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9296-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9297-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)