Abstract
This chapter begins by revisiting Marx’s famous comment in Theses on Feuerbach that “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it” to view it in light of Heidegger’s comment in 1969 rebuting Marx’s claim. Heidegger argues that philosophy as interpretation is essential in any concept of social or political change. The chapter moves from the concept of praxis to the concept of practice and the turn to practice in recent theorizing. The notion of practice often figures as an unanalyzable ‘given’ in educational research. It is seen as the bedrock of educational activities that are widely regarded as self-evident. The presuppositions of the term are not analyzed or clarified and rarely is it acknowledged that ‘theories of practice’ not only shape what we accept as ‘true’ and ‘normal’ but also implicitly constitute a set of politico-ethical choices. The chapter makes explicit theories of practice and in particular the influence of Wittgenstein and Heidegger, before following Hubert Dreyfus in distinguishing five competing views of practices and the ethico-political commitments they embody: Stability (Wittgenstein, Bourdieu); Articulation (Hegel, Merleau-Ponty); Appropriative Gathering (Heidegger); Dissemination, Difference (Derrida); Problematization (Foucault). On this basis the chapter distinguishes distinct views of interpretation in educational research, and what it is for. The five views of practice provide a way of categorizing how those different kinds of interpretation enter at every stage of the educational research process.
it is men [sic] who change circumstances, and … the educator himself needs educating.
—Karl Marx
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQsQOqa0UVc Uploaded on Jan 26, 2007.
- 3.
Engels, Feuerbach: The Roots of Socialist Philosophy (Chas. H. Kerr & Co., Chicago, 1908) 96.
References
Argyris, C. (1999). On organizational learning. Malden: Blackwell Business.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning. Reading: Addison-Wesley (Orig. 1978).
Bloor, D. (2001). Wittgenstein and the priority of practice. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetiona, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 95–106). London: Routledge.
Dreyfus, H. (1993). Heidegger on the connection between nihilism, art, technology, and politics. In C. Guignon (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Heidegger (pp. 289–316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbons, M., et al. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.
Hall, H. (1993). Intentionality and world: Division I of Being and Time. In C. Guignon (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Heidegger (pp. 122–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marx, K. (1963). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Marx and Engels: Basic writings on politics and philosophy. London.
Rorty, R. (1993). Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and the reification of language. In C. Guignon (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Heidegger (pp. 337–357). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetiona, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London/New York: Routledge.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schön, D. A. (1995). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Arena (Orig. 1983, Basic Books).
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peters, M.A. (2015). “A Demand for Philosophy”: Interpretation, Educational Research, and Transformative Practice. In: Smeyers, P., Bridges, D., Burbules, N., Griffiths, M. (eds) International Handbook of Interpretation in Educational Research. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9282-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9282-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9281-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9282-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)