Abstract
For nearly two decades, universities throughout the world and specifically in the West have increasingly committed themselves to incorporating ethics education in their curricula for various reasons. Recent fraudulent financial scandals (e.g., Enron, WorldCom, Adelphia, Tyco) have led to public questioning whether accountants and auditors have forgotten their professional responsibilities. Many researchers also attributed these ethics scandals to the lack of moral development of managers and the amoral, “profits first theoretical underpinnings of business education”. The result was proposals by bodies such as the Education Committee of the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy to increase the credit hour requirements in business ethics education, supporting the importance of ethics training for the current students who will become the new professionals, and the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, the primary accrediting body of collegiate schools of business, to include ethics instruction in accredited business programs. Managing scientific misconduct is another impetus in the scientific community to provide ethics education to scientific researchers and practitioners. Scientific misconduct ranges from fabrication of data and harming research participants to inappropriate assignment of authorship and withholding details of methodology or results in publications. The growing public concerns with the accelerating development of science and technology, revealed by the public debates of the ethical dimensions of such products, is a third reason that prompted schools to provide students with the right tools to discuss such ethical issues that arise in their academic disciplines. Teaching ethics also matters because there is consensus among specialists on development issues that ethic education is the most important factor in global development and is the major indicator of progression and regression in today’s world. Development is now measured by the extent to which the ethics of human powers understand and use constituents of the technological and scientific revolution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdolmohammadi, M., and M. Reeves. 2000. Effects of education and intervention on business students’ ethical cognition: A cross sectional and longitudinal study. Teaching Business Ethics 4:269–284.
Al-Amrousy, G. 2010. I’tedaa Altabib Ala Alnafs fi thel elmakased alshar’eya walakhlaqeyat altebbeya (The Physician Attack on the Soul in Light of the Religious Objectives and Medical Ethics). Alexandria: Dar Elfekr Algame’e.
Al-Qurradaghi, A., and A. Al-Mohammady. 2005. Fiqh AlQadaya Al-Tebbeya Al-Moaasera (Jurisprudence of Contemporary Medical Issues). Beirut: Dar Al-Bashaer Al-Islamia.
Antes, A., S. Murphy, E. Waples, M. Mumford, R. Brown, S. Connelly, and L. Devenport. 2009. A meta-nalysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior 19 (5): 379–402.
Assudani, R., R. Chinta, C. Manolis, and D. Burns. 2011. The effect of pedagogy on students’ perceptions of the importance of ethics and social responsibility in business firms. Ethics & Behavior 21 (2): 103–117.
Beauchamp, T., and J. Childress. 1994. Principles of Bbiomedical Eethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, T. 2009. Learning from ethicists: How moral philosophy is taught at leading english-speaking institutions. Teaching Ethics 10 (1) :11–42.
Day, L. 2006. Ethics in media communications. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
Felton, E., and R. Sims. 2005. Teaching business ethics: Targeted outputs. Journal of Business Ethics 60:377–391
Gautschi, F. H., and T. Jones. 1998. Enhancing the Ability of business students to recognise ethical issues: An empirical assessment of the effectiveness of a course in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 17:205–216.
Gross, M. 1999. Ethics education and physician morality. Social Science & Medicine 49:329–342.
Ho, Y., and C. Lin. 2006. Can business ethics be taught? The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning 33–38. http://hraljournal.com/Page/5%20Yi-Hui%20Ho.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2012.
ISESCO. nd. Basic document for the establishment of the Islamic body on ethics of science and technology. http://www.isesco.org.ma/english/ibest/IBEST.pdf. Accessed Feb 2011.
Jones, C. 2009. Moral relativism, cultural awareness and cooperative learning in teaching professional ethics. Teaching Ethics 10 (1): 43–50.
Kuhse, H., and P. Singer. 2001. Bioethics: An aanthology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Loeb, S. E. 1988. Teaching students accounting ethics: Some crucial issues. Issues in Accounting Education 3:316–329.
Lopez, Y., R. Rechner, and J. Olson-Buchanan. 2005. Shaping ethical perceptions: An empirical assessment of the influence of business education, culture, and demographic factors. Journal of Business Ethics 60:341–358.
Mumford, M., S. Connelly, R. Brown, S. Murphy, J. Hill, A. Antes, E. Waples, and L. Devenport. 2008. A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics & Behavior 18 (4): 315–339.
Paul, R., and L. Elder. 2006. Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Columbus: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Shawver, T. 2006. An exploratory study assessing the effectiveness of a professional responsibility course. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education 3:49–66.
Ten Have, H. 2005. A helping and caring profession: Medicine as a normative practice. In Clinical bioethics. A search for the foundations ed. C.,Viafora, 75–97. Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Darwish, B. (2015). How Effective Can Ethics Education Be?. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Bioethics Education in a Global Perspective. Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9232-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9232-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9231-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9232-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)