Abstract
In this chapter we reflect upon the questions that have been answered and, as importantly, raised in the course of the DelFly project. We identify some of the core problems remaining in the field and discuss the ongoing and planned future work on the road to an ever smaller and more autonomous DelFlys.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
For a few occasions in which we have live imagery of this situation, please look at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Mxq-nr9xyY (at 2:10 in the video), or, even clearer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOec0p8pNpA (starting from 1:28 in the video).
References
S.F. Armanini, C.C. de Visser, G.C.H.E. de Croon (2015) Black-box lti modelling of flapping-wing micro aerial vehicle dynamics, in AIAA conference 2015
A. Briod, A. Klaptocz, J.-C. Zufferey, D. Floreano, The airburr: a flying robot that can exploit collisions, in 2012 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering (CME) (2012), pp. 569–574, IEEE
A. Briod, K. Przemyslaw, J.-C. Zufferey, D. Floreano, A collision-resilient flying robot. J. Field Robot. 31(4), 496–509 (2014)
P.-J. Bristeau, F. Callou, D. Vissiere, N. Petit et al., The navigation and control technology inside the ar. drone micro uav, in 18th IFAC World Congress, vol. 18, pp. 1477–1484 (2011)
J.V. Caetano, C.C. de Visser, G.C.H.E. de Croon, B. Remes, C. de Wagter, J. Verboom, M. Mulder, Linear aerodynamic model identification of a flapping wing mav based on flight test data. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 5(4), 273–286 (2013)
J.V. Caetano, M. Percin, C.C. de Visser, B. van Oudheusden, G.C.H.E. de Croon, C. de Wagter, B. Remes, M. Mulder, Tethered vs. free flight force determination of the delfly ii flapping wing micro air vehicle, in 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) (2014), pp. 942–948, IEEE
J.V. Caetano, M. Percin, B.W. van Oudheusden, B. Remes, C. de Wagter, G.C.H.E. de Croon, C.C. de Visser (2013) Unsteady forces acting on a flapping wing micro air vehicle: free-flight versus wind tunnel experimental methods (Submitted)
G.C.H.E. de Croon, K.M.E. de Clerq, R. Ruijsink, B. Remes, C. de Wagter, Design, aerodynamics, and vision-based control of the delfly. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 1(2), 71–97 (2009)
G.C.H.E. de Croon, M.A. Groen, C. de Wagter, B.D.W. Remes, R. Ruijsink, B.W. van Oudheusden, Design, aerodynamics, and autonomy of the delfly. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 7(2), 025003 (2012)
J.W. Kruyt, E.M. QuicazĂ¡n-Rubio, G.J.F. van Heijst, D.L. Altshuler, D. Lentink, Hummingbird wing efficacy depends on aspect ratio and compares with helicopter rotors. J. R. Soc. Interface 11(99), 20140585 (2014)
F. Scarano, Tomographic PIV: principles and practice. Measur. Sci. Tech. 24(1), 012001 (2013)
K.Y.W. Scheper, S. Tijmons, C.C. de Visser, G.C.H.E. de Croon, Behaviour trees for evolutionary robotics. Artif. Life 22(1), (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Bussiness Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Croon, G.C.H.E., Perçin, M., Remes , B.D.W., Ruijsink, R., De Wagter, C. (2016). Conclusions and Future Research. In: The DelFly. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9208-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9208-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9207-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9208-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)