Skip to main content

Synthetic Biology, Biotechnology Patents and the Protection of Human Health. A Consideration of the Principals at Stake

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Synbio and Human Health

Abstract

Synthetic biology offers our society huge possibilities in the large-scale prevention and cure of numerous medical conditions and physical deficits. However, it also involves serious legal and philosophical dilemmas. This paper tries to offer a critical vision of the legal framework related to this issue, paying special attention to the principles at stake. On one hand, it points out the legal necessity to separate the legitimate protection of the invention from the arbitrary monopolization of the discovery. On the other hand, it highlights that a general reorganization of the regulation of patents might be needed, so as to avoid some of the dysfunctions that this regime provokes in terms of justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • AA.VV (2006) Il gene invadente, Milano: Baldini-Castoldi-Dalai

    Google Scholar 

  • AA.VV (2011) Romeo Casabona CM (ed) Los nuevos horizontes de la investigacion genetica, Comares, Bilbao-Granada

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker D, Church G, Collins J, Endy D, Jacobson J, Keasling J, Modrich P, Smolke C, Weiss R (2006) Engineering life: building a fab for biology. Sci Am 294(6):44–51, PMID 16711359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer A, Martin P (2008) Synthetic biology: social and ethical challenges. http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/web/FILES/Reviews/0806_synthetic_biology.pdf

  • Bifulco R, D’aloia A (2008) Un diritto per il futuro. Teorie e modelli della responsabilità intergenerazionale. Jovene, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  • Bifulco R, Celotto A, Cartabia M (2001) L’Europa dei diritti, II Mulino, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Bologna G (1996) I contenuti della sostenibilità, Ed. Ambiente, n. 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschiero N (ed) (2006) Bioetica e biotecnologie nel diritto internazionale e comunitario: questioni generali e tutela della proprietà intellettuale. Giappichelli, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg JA (2006) Mining the common heritage of our DNA: lessons learned from Grotius and Pardo. 5 Duke Low & Technology Review 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert J (2008) The commodification of emergence: systems biology, synthetic biology and intellectual property. BioSocieties 3:383, London School of Economics and Political Science

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campiglio C (1999) I brevetti tecnologici nel diritto comunitario, in Dir Comm Int 849

    Google Scholar 

  • Casaburi C (2005) Le biotecnologie fra diritto comunitario, Corte di Giustizia e inadempimento italiano. Foro Interno IV:408

    Google Scholar 

  • Casonato C, Piciocchi C, Veronesi P (eds) (2011) I dati genetici nel biodiritto. Cedam, Padova

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassier M, Gaudillère JP (2004) Le génome: bien privé ou bien commun? Biofutur 10:204

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli Sforza L, Menozzi P, Piazza A (1994) The history and geography of human genes. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciciriello MC (1996) Dal principio del patrimonio comune al concetto di sviluppo sostenibile, in Dir Giur Agr Amb n. 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Danchin A (2008) Synthetic biology: discovering new worlds and new words. EMBO Rep. doi:10.1038/embor.2008.159

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies K (2001) Il codice della vita. Genoma: la storia e il futuro di una grande scoperta. Mondadori, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • De Miguel Beriain I (2010) Biología sintética y propiedad intelectual, una relación complicada, Perspectivas en Derecho y Genoma Humano. n.16, 2, Bilbao

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducor PG (1998) Patenting the recombinant products of biotechnology. Kluwer Law International, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen M, Schuster P (1978) The hypercycle. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Elowitz MB, Leibler S (2000) A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403(6767):335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falcone A (2005) La tutela del patrimonio genetico umano nel processo di individuazione e codificazione ‘costituzionale’ dei diritti fondamentali dell’Unione Europea. In: Scudiero M (ed) Il Trattato costituzionale nel processo di integrazione europea. Jovene, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  • Francioni F (ed) (2001) Human rights & international trade. Hart, Oxfrod

    Google Scholar 

  • Gestri M (2006) La gestione delle risorse naturali d’interesse generale per la comunità internazionale. Giappichelli, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghidini G, Hassan S (1990) Biotecnologie, novità vegetali e brevetti. Giuffrè, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandoni G (2001) La nuova direttiva sugli organismi geneticamente modificati, Riv Dir Agr 427

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (2002) Il futuro della natura umana. I rischi di una genetica liberale. Einaudi, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller MA, Eiserman RS (1998) Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280(5364):698. doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel J, Maurer SM (2007) The economics of synthetic biology. Mol Syst Biol 3:117

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel J, Reitzig M (2008) Patent sharks. Harvard Business Review, 129

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas H (1987) Creazione dell’uomo, il Mulino (XXXVI), Bologna, 615

    Google Scholar 

  • Juengst ET (1998) Should we treat the human germ-line as a global human resource? In: Agius E, Busuttil S (eds) Germ-line intervention and our responsibilities to future generations. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 85–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaznessis YN (2007) Models for synthetic biology. BMC Syst Biol. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-1-47

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Rai A (2007) Synthetic biology: the intellectual property puzzle. Tex Law Rev 85:1745

    Google Scholar 

  • Leduc S (1912) La Biologie Synthétique. A. Poinat Editeur, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R (1993) Biologia come ideologia. La dottrina del DNA. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucarelli A (2013) La democrazia dei beni comuni. Laterza, Bari

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín Urganda A (2003) La protección juridica de las innovaciones biotecnológicas. Comares, Bilbao

    Google Scholar 

  • Menesini V (1996) Le invenzioni biotecnologiche fra scoperte scientifiche, applicazioni industriali, preoccupazioni bioetiche. Riv Dir Int I:399

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller AR, Davis MH (2000) Intellectual property: patents, trademarks, and copyright in a nutshell. West Group, St.Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan RS, Waxman MMJ (1970) Synthetic biology patent applications expected to present new challenges. Life Sci Law Ind Rep 2(12):473

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod J (1970) Il caso e la necessità. Mondadori, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Moufang R (1989) Patentability of genetic inventions in animals. IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law 20(6):823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy SD (2001) Biotechnology and international law. Harvard Int Law J 41:47

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavoni R (2004) Biodiversità e biotecnologieneldirittointernazionale e comunitario. Giuffrè, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Bustamante G (1998) Patentes de invención Biotecnológicas: un análisis jurídico-económico, Revista de derecho y Genoma Humano, 8/1998, 159

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai AK, Boyle J (2007) Synthetic biology: caught between property rights, the public domain, and the commons. PLoS Biol 5:58

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin J (1998) Il secolo biotech. Il commercio genetico e l’inizio di una nuova era. Baldini & Castoldi, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter WE (1919) The unity of the organism. Richard G. Badger, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodotà S (2011) Il corpo giuridificato. In: Rodotà S, Zatti P (eds) Trattato di Biodiritto, vol I. Giuffrè, Milano, AA VV

    Google Scholar 

  • Romeo Casabona CM (2002) Los genes y sus leyes. El derecho ante el genoma umano. Comares, Bilbao

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickberger Monroe W (1992) Trattato di genetica. Piccin, Padova

    Google Scholar 

  • Szostak JW, Bartel DP, Luisi PL (2001) Synthesizing life. Nature 409:387–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Overwalle G (2002) Study on the patenting of inventions related to human stem cell research, Luxembourg Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanghì C (1998) Pour la protection des génération futures, Boutros Ghali Amicorum Discipulorumque Liber, II, 1459. Bruylant, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Falcone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Falcone, A. (2014). Synthetic Biology, Biotechnology Patents and the Protection of Human Health. A Consideration of the Principals at Stake. In: de Miguel Beriain, I., Romeo Casabona, C. (eds) Synbio and Human Health. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9196-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics