Skip to main content

Monitoring and Analyzing Quality of Life – An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Handbook of Quality of Life

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life ((IHQL))

Abstract

The approach of monitoring and analyzing quality of life rests on concepts and methods which are a combination of thinking from the fields of social science, philosophy, psychology, politics, economics and social statistics. Quality of life and wellbeing are goals that have explicit emerged since the last century. The components of quality of life are mainly focused on positive wellbeing but also to negative wellbeing and to future expectations. Quality of life research is interested in evaluations of good and bad states of society, which easily leads to disputes about their value basis. The world is divided into objective and subjective reality; the subjective reality is the perception of ordinary people, whereas the objective reality refers to the definition of experts after having made carefully investigations of reality. There are many possible ways to monitor and analyze quality of life. The problem is that the methods influence the results. A main problem of quality of life can be seen in the relationship between diversity and inequality on the globe. This chapter gives an overview of the topic of quality of life as well of the structure and content of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The mixture of terms was introduced at the beginning of this research direction in the US. One of the first main studies spoke of “Quality of Life” (Campbell et al. 1976) and the other of “Wellbeing ” and “Life quality” (Andrews and Withey 1976); “Wellbeing” was used later by Campbell (1981).

  2. 2.

    Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100); came into force on 7 April 1948.

  3. 3.

    Jolly, Richard/Emmerij, Louis/Weiss, Thomas G./Hall, Jonathan: Human Development Reporting and the United Nations. See section of these authors in Chap. 7.

References and Selected Contributions

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, T., Hicks, L., & Wattenberg, J. (2001). The first measured century. Washington, DC: The AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2008). Well-being for all. Concepts and tools for social cohesion. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research Quality Life, 1(2), 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2009). The science of well-being (Social indicators research series). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup International Research Institute, Interview with Humanity. (1978). Human needs and satisfactions: A global survey. Basle/Bâle: Baloise Insurance Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup World Poll. (2010). www.gallup.com. Last accessed on 15 Dec 2011.

  • Glatzer, W. (Ed.). (2002). Rich and poor. Disparities, perceptions, concomitants. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatzer, W. (2011). Cross-national comparisons of quality of life in developed nations, including the impact of globalization. In K. Land, A. C. Michalos, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatzer, W., von Below, S., & Stoffregen, M. (2004). Challenges for quality of life in the contemporary world. Advances in quality of life studies, theory and research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C., Michalos, A. C., & Sirgy, M. J. (2012). Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, S. (Ed.). (1994). Convergence or divergence? Comparing recent social trends in industrial societies. Frankfurt am Main: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (Ed.). (2005). Citation classics from social indicators research (Social indicators research series). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. (2014). Encyclopedia of quality of life and wellbeing research. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, V., & Huschka, D. (2009). Quality of life and the millennium challenge (Social indicators research series). Dordrecht/London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, V., Huschka, D., & Michalos, A. C. (2008). Barometers of quality of life around the globe. How are we doing? (Social indicators research series, Vol. 33). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1972). Subjective elements of well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1920/2009). The economics of welfare. New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2009). Well-being in nations and well-being of nations. Social Indicators Research, 91(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (Dir.). World database of happiness. http://www1.eur.nl/fsw/happiness/. Accessed 25 Mar 2014.

  • Word Value Survey Wave 5. (2005–2008). Banco de Datos ASEP/JDS. http://www.jdsurvey.net. Accessed 24 Mar 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Glatzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glatzer, W. (2015). Monitoring and Analyzing Quality of Life – An Introduction. In: Glatzer, W., Camfield, L., Møller, V., Rojas, M. (eds) Global Handbook of Quality of Life. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9178-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics