Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolutionary Theory in Secondary Schools: Some Teaching Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences

  • 3252 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter brings out the curriculum changes in the teaching of Evolutionary Biology over 100 years in French High School. First and foremost, we examine what scientific knowledge is required and then, we wonder whether current curriculum will properly answer the questions raised by students. The first part focuses on an overall of the content to be taught and epistemological anchorages points of the curricula from 1950 to today. The second part highlights the main students’ conceptions about the history of life on Earth and points out the lacks of the curriculum to meet students’ questions about the relevance of the Theory of Evolution. The last part is a discussion on new prospects of Evolutionary Biology teaching, which is not only limited to the transmission of scientific knowledge but should also help students to change their misconceptions and to develop their own critical thinking with regard to creationist or intelligent design arguments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Acronym introduced by A. Giordan (1976) O: observation, P: problem, H: hypothesis, E: experiment, R: result, I: interpretation, C: conclusion.

  2. 2.

    National Research Council (1996), National Academy of Sciences (1998, 2008).

References

  • Aroua, S., Coquidé, M., & Abbes, S. (2002). L’évolution biologique: Conceptions et rapport au savoir d’élèves tunisiens. In Actes des XXIVes J.I.E.S (pp. 265–268), Chamonix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudouin, C., & Brosseau, O. (2008). Les créationnismes. Une menace pour la société française? Paris: Syllepse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, C. (1865). Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expérimentale. Paris: Baillière.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagher, Z., & Boujaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, C. (1993). L’évolution: du mot aux concepts. thèse de doctorat, université Paris 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, C. (1996). Evolution: Unitary sujet-matter in biology teaching. In The new learning models (109–118), Z’Edtions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, C. (2000a, octobre). Classification et évolution. APBG, no. 3, pp. 525–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, C. (2000b). Les causes de l’évolution. In Les formes de causalités dans les sciences de la vie et de la terre (Documents et travaux de recherche en éducation, no. 41, pp. 81–101). Paris: INRP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, C. (2006). Créationnisme et finalisme évolutionniste. Argos, CRDP Créteil, no. 39, février, pp. 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, C. (2009a). La métaphore de la parenté est-elle un obstacle à l’idée d’évolution? In M. Coquidé & S. Tirard (dir.), l’évolution du vivant, un enseignement à risque? Paris: Vuibert-Adapt (sous presse).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, C. (2009b). L’enseignement de l’évolution: entre description et explication. In M. Coquidé & S. Tirard (dir.), l’évolution du vivant, un enseignement à risque? Paris: Vuibert-Adapt (sous presse).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayon, J. (1993). La biologie entre loi et histoire. Philosophie, no. 38, juin, éd. de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordan, A. (1976). Rien ne sert de courir, il faut partir à point. PhD dissertation, Paris V et Paris VII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gohau, G. (1987). Difficultés d’une pédagogie de la découverte dans l’enseignement des sciences. Aster, no. 5, pp. 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1989). Wonderful life. The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. New York: W.W Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J. A., & Brem, S. K. (2004). Teaching evolutionary biology: Pressures, stress, and coping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 791–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulin, N. (2002). Sciences naturelles et formation de l’esprit. Autour de la réforme de l’enseignement de 1902. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, P. (2001). “L’influence du positivisme dans la réforme de l’enseignement scientifique secondaire de 1902”, Cahiers d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences, no. 49, “études sur l’histoire de l’enseignement des sciences physiques et naturelles” (textes réunis par N. Hulin), pp. 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, R. (2009). Darwin’s ways of working-the opportunity for education. Journal of Biological Education, 43(3), 101–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mc Bride, P. D., Guiman, L., & Wright, S. (2009). Current debates on the origin of species. Journal of Biological Education, 43(3), 104–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz, F., Quessada, M. P., & Clément, P. (2007). “Des analyses statistiques multivariées pour traiter les données issues de questionnaires: Conceptions d’enseignants et futurs enseignants de douze pays sur l’évolution”, Journées de l’Association pour la recherche en didactique des sciences et des techniques (ARDIST).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (1998, 2008). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osif, B. A. (1997). Evolution and religious beliefs: A survey of Pennsylvania high school teachers. American Biology Teacher, 59, 552–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhard, G. (1979). Le processus de dogmatisation. In Actes des 1res Journées de Chamonix sur l’éducation scientifique, Université Paris 7, pp. 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutmedge, M. L., & Mitchell, M. A. (2002). High school biology teachers’ knowledge structure, acceptance, and teaching of evolution. American Biology Teacher, 64, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M., & Ngxola, N. (2009). Identifying teachers’ concerns about teaching evolution. Journal of Biological Education, 43(3), 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolberg, T. (2007). The relio-scientific frameworks of pre-service Primary Teachers: An analysis of their influence on their of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 909–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, C. S., & Scharmann, L. C. (2001). High school students’ perceptions of evolutionary theory. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(2).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. STEF ENS Cachan/Institut français d’éducation (IFE) ENS Lyon, Lyon, France

    Corinne Fortin

Authors
  1. Corinne Fortin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinne Fortin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, INRA, UMR 1313, Jouy-en-Josas, France

    Thomas Heams

  2. Institut d’Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques, CNRS/Université Paris I Sorbonne/ENS, Paris, France

    Philippe Huneman

  3. Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), Paris, France

    Guillaume Lecointre

  4. Éditions Matériologiques, Paris, France

    Marc Silberstein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fortin, C. (2015). Evolutionary Theory in Secondary Schools: Some Teaching Issues. In: Heams, T., Huneman, P., Lecointre, G., Silberstein, M. (eds) Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9014-7_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation