Skip to main content

Current Darwinism in Social Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences

Abstract

Darwinian theories concerned with human behaviour come in many forms. They can describe both the biological evolution of human cognition and the evolution of cultural traits in human communities. We briefly review these two types of Darwinian theories, including socio-biology, evolutionary psychology, memetics and dual inheritance theory, and show how insights from both types can be combined in a single framework: cultural epidemiology. We argue, however, that this is profitable only if selectionists models of cultural evolution are replaced by an attractor model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Clavien’s chapter, Chap. 34, this volume.

  2. 2.

    For further discussion on adaptation, see Grandcolas’ chapter, Chap. 5, this volume. For a discussion of adaptationism within psychological theories, see Downes’ chapter, Chap. 31, this volume.

  3. 3.

    See Huneman’s chapter, Chap. 4, this volume, on that topic.

  4. 4.

    That is to say that behaviour has an impact on reproduction. The fact that some organisms manage a greater reproductive efficiency allows biological evolution to take place. What is eventually selected is the genetic basis that makes a difference at the behavioral level.

  5. 5.

    See Downes, Chap. 31, this volume.

  6. 6.

    See Christine Clavien’s chapter: Chap. 34, this volume.

  7. 7.

    For a more detailed analysis, see the chapters on evolutionary psychology in this volume.

  8. 8.

    For further details please refer to the chapters on selection and heritability in this volume.

  9. 9.

    This is the case in the standard models of population genetics used in dual inheritance theory. Subtler accounts of biological evolution are not relevant here because they have not been exploited by metaphorical Darwinisms.

References

  • Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunger, R. (2002). The electric meme: A new theory of how we think. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M., Sperber, D. (2002). Kinship and evolved psychological dispositions. Current Anthropology, 43(5), 723–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2000). Memes: Universal acid or a better mousetrap. In R. Aunger (Ed.), Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P. (2001). Et l’homme créa les dieux : comment expliquer la religion. Paris: R. Laffont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. (1974). The genetics of human populations. Scientific American, 231(3), 80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claidière, N., & Sperber, D. (2007). The role of attraction in cultural evolution. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 7(1), 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J. H., & Crook, S. (1988). Tibetan polyandry: Problems of adaptation and fitness. In Human reproductive behavior: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 97–114).

    Google Scholar 

  • Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 148–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of the species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: J. Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, J. W., Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D., & Crow, J. F. (1998). Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics, 148(4), 1667–1686.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, M. (1971). Self organisation of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften, 58, 465–523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2006). Roots of human sociality. New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2006). Sylvia’s recipe: The role of imitation and pedagogy in the transmission of cultural knowledge. In Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 229–255).

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, S. (2007). Conditions for evolution by natural selection. Journal of Philosophy, 104, 489–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2008). Five misunderstandings about cultural evolution. Human Nature, 19(2), 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (1994). Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. (1970). The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1984). Typological versus population thinking. In Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology (pp. 157–160).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Laland, K. N. (2004). Perspective: Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of the origin of species. Evolution, 58, 1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2000). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(7), 261–267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A. (1985). Inuit foraging groups: Some simple models incorporating conflicts of interest, relatedness, and central-place sharing. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6(1), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. (2002). Defense of massive modularity. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Dupoux, language, brain and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Hirschfeld, L. A. (2004). The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 40–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Heintz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heintz, C., Claidière, N. (2015). Current Darwinism in Social Science. In: Heams, T., Huneman, P., Lecointre, G., Silberstein, M. (eds) Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9014-7_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics