Skip to main content

The Social Psychology of Immigration and Inequality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Immigration and inequality are inextricably intertwined. Inequality is an important determinant of immigration, and immigration in turn generates powerful inequalities. The study of immigration and inequality is not usually considered “social psychological.” Yet social psychology provides general conceptual tools which can illuminate not only the inner workings of immigration and inequality but also their deep connections and affinities with phenomena and processes in farflung domains. Accordingly, this chapter explores the social psychology of immigration and inequality. We adopt the strategy of starting both from basic theory and from inductive exploration of immigration and inequality. As will be seen, the two approaches touch, suggesting that someday, with the growth of knowledge, they will converge. Basic theory yields a wealth of testable predictions for the relations between natives and immigrants and between different types of immigrants, including predictions for emigration, social distance, discrimination, segregation, profiling, and assimilation. Inductive exploration yields a wealth of testable propositions, including propositions about types of migrants, the effects of U.S. immigration law on sibship inequality, and the black immigrants and native U.S. citizens who may help eradicate racial and color inequality. Both approaches increase knowledge, not least by pointing to theoretical and empirical lacunae as well as data deficiencies. Each approach nurtures and spurs the other—basic theory by challenging empiricalists to test the theoretical predictions, inductive exploration by challenging theorists to incorporate new terms (such as rights) and to derive new predictions.

Everything that rises must converge. Teilhard de Chardin, 1950

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The gold standard is the Newtonian hypothetico-deductive theory, whose assumptions are “genuine guesses about the structure of the world” (Popper 1963, p. 245), whose predictions display the “marvellous deductive unfolding” of the theory (Popper 1963, p. 221), and whose fruitfulness is evident in the “derivations far afield from its original domain,” which “permit an increasingly broad and diversified basis for testing the theory” (Danto 1967, pp. 299–300)—exactly in the spirit of Merton’s words above.

  2. 2.

    What we are here calling two approaches are sometimes regarded as sequential stages in the development of a scientific discipline—in the classic formulation by Koopmans (1947), the “Kepler stage” of discovering “empirical regularities” and the “Newton stage” of discovering “fundamental laws.” Knowledge gained with the guiding hand of theory is more robust and reliable than knowledge obtained from “measurement without theory” (Koopmans 1947) or “inference without theory” (Wolpin 2013).

  3. 3.

    The Gini and the two Theil measures are among the set of classical measures of overall inequality. Others include the Atkinson measures and Pearson’s coefficient of variation. For brief introduction to these measures and their formulas, see Jasso and Kotz (2008, pp. 37–41).

  4. 4.

    The term “comparison” is used to denote outcomes generated by comparing an actual amount of X to a just or expected amount of X (the X* version). The outcome depends on both X and X*. This comparison operation is sometimes confused with the operation of locating self or other within a hierarchy, which may require noticing other people’s amounts of X to discern the focal individual’s relative rank. But this latter operation yields only one variable—the relative rank—and this one variable generates the sociobehavioral outcome. The key to avoiding confusion is to ask how many independent variables are in the function generating the outcome. As noted, justice and the other comparison processes are generated by two variables, X and X*, but status and power are generated by only a single variable, X.

  5. 5.

    The expressiveness part of the signature constant θ plays an important part in empirical work but can be safely ignored in much theoretical work. The framing part of the signature constant is always important, but can safely be set as positive, given that results for bads are readily established from results on goods. Accordingly, in the rest of this chapter, the signature constant is fixed at + 1.

  6. 6.

    “The terms “Personal Identity,” “Subgroup Identity,” and “Group Identity” provide a convenient shorthand for “individual’s PSO score,” “subgroup average PSO score,” and “group average PSO score” (Jasso 2008). Because there are many social science terms that include “identity” in them, this chapter follows the convention of capitalizing the three terms used here, to indicate the special meaning attached to them.

  7. 7.

    Mathematically, this is an application of the classic Newtonian idea that mass accumulates at a point.

  8. 8.

    Note that when the subgroup PSO inequality (Section on “Inequality in the Elements of Basic Theory”) is represented by the absolute difference between the average PSO in the two subgroups, it equals the social distance.

  9. 9.

    Formulas and graphs for these distributions are provided in Jasso and Kotz (2008, pp. 36–37). For further properties, see Johnson et al. (1994, 1995) and Kleiber and Kotz (2003).

  10. 10.

    Jasso and Kotz (2008) establish that as personal X inequality increases, subgroup X inequality increases. The social distance results summarized here further establish that as personal X inequality increases, subgroup PSO inequality also increases, but only if people care about material goods and the dominant PSO is justice or power. For example, if X is wealth and the PSO is self-esteem, as personal wealth inequality increases, so do both subgroup wealth inequality and subgroup self-esteem inequality. However, if status is the PSO, as personal wealth inequality increases, so does subgroup wealth inequality but not subgroup status inequality.

  11. 11.

    As further analyses accumulate, exact numerical predictions will become available for justice and power societies. Jasso (2008, pp. 427–430) provides an initial glimpse, suggesting that a justice-materialistic society in which the valued good is Pareto-distributed will resemble a status society, that a justice-nonmaterialistic society and a justice-materialistic society in which the valued good is power-function-distributed will be identical and the mirror image of a status society, and that a justice-materialistic society in which the valued good is lognormally-distributed will have equal numbers of Selfistas and Subgroupistas. These symmetries and asymmetries are rooted in fundamental features of the probability distributions of the valued goods.

  12. 12.

    The reverse is also increasingly the case. It could be said that it is impossible to study social stratification without studying migration (Jasso 2011).

  13. 13.

    This is a major data deficiency which immigration researchers are striving to address. The New Immigrant Survey provides the requisite information for selected annual cohorts of new legal permanent residents (including their entire visa history, which may include spells with temporary visas or in an unauthorized status). But there is currently no similarly detailed information for a representative sample of the population of resident foreign-born. For further information on the New Immigrant Survey and to download public-use data and associated documentation, please see http://nis.princeton.edu.

  14. 14.

    The numerical discrepancy across the estimates developed by the Census Bureau and the Office of Immigration Statistics—a feature of estimates for all years for which the underlying data are available (viz., 2007–2011)—merits further analysis, but such analysis lies outside the scope of the present chapter. One may speculate whether one or more of the Census figures is an underestimate and whether one or more of the DHS figures is an overestimate. Note that it is not unusual for estimates to differ across estimating agency; for example, estimates of the world’s total population prepared by the Census Bureau differ from estimates prepared by the United Nations (Roberts 2011).

  15. 15.

    See Desravines (2013) for a personal account of some of these processes.

  16. 16.

    The United States has a historic commitment of over half a century to eradicate discrimination on racial grounds. It is over 50 years since President John F. Kennedy issued the groundbreaking Executive Order 10925 prohibiting discrimination on the basis of “race, creed, color, or national origin” (6 March 1961) and soon thereafter signed the Equal Pay Act (10 June 1963), extending to gender the protection against discrimination. The new spirit quickly reached the field of immigration, and Congress passed Public Law 87–301 (enacted 26 September 1961), which eliminated the requirement that visa applicants provide their race.

  17. 17.

    The New Immigrant Survey measured respondent skin color using a scale designed by Douglas S. Massey and Jennifer A. Martin, based on an idea originally developed by Massey et al. (2003). The scale is an 11-point scale, ranging from zero to 10, with zero representing albinism (the total absence of color) and 10 representing the darkest possible skin. The ten shades of skin color corresponding to the points 1–10 on the NIS Skin Color Scale are depicted in a chart, with each point represented by a hand, of identical form, but differing in color. The NIS Skin Color Scale is for use by interviewers, who “memorize” the scale, so that respondents never see the chart. [A copy of the Scale appears in the appendix.]

References

  • Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. ([384–322 BC] 1952). The works of Aristotle. 2 volumes (trans: W. D. Ross). Chicago: Britannica Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16(4), 461–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, F. D., & Stevens, G. (2003). America’s newcomers and the dynamics of diversity. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1974). Presidential address: Parameters of social structure. American Sociological Review, 39(5), 615–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. C. (1967). Philosophy of science, problems of. In P. Edwards (Ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 6, pp. 296–300). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desravines, J. S. (19 January 2013). Giving children a chance. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1978). The celebration of heroes: Prestige as a control system. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoefer, M., Rytina, N., & Baker, B. C. (2012). Estimates of the unauthorized immigrant population residing in the United States: January 2011. DHS-OIS Population Estimates. Includes unauthorized applying for LPR who have been granted work authorization. Also reports estimate of legal temporary residents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms (Revised edition). New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, N. (2004). The evolution of human skin and skin color. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 585–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, N., & Chaplin, G. (2000). The evolution of human skin coloration. Journal of Human Evolution, 39(1), 57–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1978). On the justice of earnings: A new specification of the justice evaluation function. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1398–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1990). Methods for the theoretical and empirical analysis of comparison processes. Sociological Methodology, 20, 369–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (2003). Migration, human development, and the lifecourse. In J. T. Mortimer & M. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the lifecourse (pp. 331–364). New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (2008). A new unified theory of sociobehavioral forces. European Sociological Review, 24(4), 411–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (2011). Migration and stratification. Social Science Research, 40(5), 1292–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G., & Kotz, S. (2008). Two types of inequality: Inequality between persons and inequality between subgroups. Sociological Methods and Research, 37(1), 31–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1990).The new chosen people: Immigrants in the United States (a volume in “The Population of the United States in the 1980s: A Census Monograph Series). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2006). Characteristics of immigrants to the United States: 1820–2003. In R. Ueda (Ed.), A companion to American immigration (pp. 328–358, a volume in the series, Blackwell Companions to American History). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G., Massey, D. S., Rosenzweig, M. R., & Smith, J. P. (2000). The new immigrant survey pilot (NIS-P): Overview and new findings about U.S. legal immigrants at admission. Demography, 37(1), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1994). Continuous univariate distributions (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous univariate distributions (Vol. 2, 2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, C., & Kotz, S. (2003). Statistical size distributions in economics and actuarial sciences. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C. (1947). Measurement without theory. Review of Economics and Statistics, 29(3), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., Charles, C. Z., Lundy, G., & Fischer, M. J. (2003). The source of the river: The social origins of freshmen at America’s selective colleges and universities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957). Continuities in the theory of reference groups and social structure. In R. K. Merton. Social theory and social structure (2nd ed., revised and enlarged, pp. 281–386). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1978). Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 86(5), 749–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2006). Immigrant America: A portrait (3rd ed. Revised, expanded, and updated). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayo, L., & Becker, G. S. (2007). Evolutionary efficiency and happiness. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), 302–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, M. (4 December 2012). For young Latino readers, an image is missing. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. (31 October 2011). U.N. says 7 billion now share the world. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rytina, N. (2012). Estimates of the legal permanent resident population in 2011. DHS-OIS Population Estimates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, A. B. (1979). A model and a metric for the analysis of the intragenerational status attainment process. American Journal of Sociology, 85(2), 361–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, F. F. (1952).The relative rate of communication between members of small groups. American Sociological Review, 17(4), 482–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, F. F., & Mishler, E. G. (1952). The distribution of participation in small groups: An exponential approximation. American Sociological Review, 17(5), 598–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4) 284–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2001). Sociological theory today. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 1–17). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). The New American FactFinder, Table S0501, Selected Characteristics of the Native and Foreign-Born Populations, 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). The New American FactFinder, Table S0501, Selected Characteristics of the Native and Foreign-Born Populations, 2011 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics. (2002–2011). Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of State. (2012). Annual report of immigrant visa applicants in the family-sponsored and employment-based preferences registered at the National Visa Center as of November 1, 2012. Posted online.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of State. Various issues. Visa Bulletin. Issued monthly Posted online.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. (2012). Statistical yearbook of the immigration and naturalization service. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy. (1981). U.S. immigration and the national interest: Staff report of the select commission on immigration and refugee policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés, G. (2003). Expanding definitions of giftedness: Young interpreters of immigrant background. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berghe, P. L., & Frost, P. (1986). Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: A case of gene-culture coevolution? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 9(1), 87–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D., & Berger, J. (1985). Do sociological theories grow? American Journal of Sociology, 90(4), 697–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M., Jr. (2006). Status research since 2000. Paper presented at the annual group processes conference, Montreal, Canada, August 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpin, K. I. (2013). The limits of inference without theory. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillermina Jasso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix. Scale of Skin Color Darkness

Appendix. Scale of Skin Color Darkness

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Sciences + Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jasso, G. (2014). The Social Psychology of Immigration and Inequality. In: McLeod, J., Lawler, E., Schwalbe, M. (eds) Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9002-4_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics