Skip to main content

Mental Capacity of Adult Patients in Health Care

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine
  • 592 Accesses

Abstract

Mental capacity is a fundamental determinant of an individual’s ability to make autonomous decisions. Respect for autonomy is a legal and ethical requirement in health-care provision, which necessitates that a person’s autonomous wishes be respected and informed consent validly obtained before therapeutic intervention is carried out. In Britain and many other Western jurisdictions, mental capacity legislation has developed with the aim of providing a framework for the assessment of mental capacity in health care, in a decision-specific context. Where a patient is judged to lack mental capacity with regard to a decision, the duty to respect autonomy is superseded by the duty to act beneficently and/or prevent harm which might otherwise occur due to the patient’s lack of capacity. Mental capacity legislation typically provides procedural criteria for assessing task-specific competence in terms of comprehension, appraisal, and communication. Procedural criteria do not however specify a threshold for competency assessment, or provide guidance on evaluation of irrational belief systems. Procedural assessment of mental capacity may therefore provide only a partial indication of a person’s autonomy, and further evidence in terms of instrumental rationality may be necessary to evaluation of capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beauchamp TL (1986) Suicide. In: Regan T (ed) Matters of life and death, 2nd edn. Random House, New York, pp 77–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp T, Childress J (2009) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck AT, Clark DA (1997) An information processing model of anxiety: automatic and strategic processes. Behav Res Ther 35:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belhouse J, Holland A, Clare I et al (2003) Capacity-based mental health legislation and its impact on clinical practice: 2. treatment in hospital. J Ment Health Law 24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin M, Curtis J (1986) Ethics in nursing, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn S (2005) Oxford dictionary of philosophy, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Breden TM, Vollmann J (2004) The cognitive based approach of capacity assessment in psychiatry: a philosophical critique of the MacCAT-T. Health Care Anal 12(4):273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brudney D, Lantos J (2011) Agency and authenticity: which value grounds patient choice? Theor Med Bioeth 32(4):217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan A (2004) Mental capacity, legal competence and consent to treatment. J R Soc Med 97:415–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns R, Maddock C, Buchanan A, David A, Hayward P, Richardson G, Szmukler G, Hotopf M (2005) Prevalence and predictors of mental incapacity in psychiatric in-patients. Br J Psychiatry 187:379–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns R, Richardson G, Hotopf M (2010) Deprivation of liberty: mental capacity act safeguards versus the mental health act. Psychiatrist 34:246–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A, Fattah S, Clyde Z, Coffey I, Owens DG, Johnstone EC (1999) Correlates of insight and insight change in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 35:247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charland LC (2014) Decision-making capacity. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2014 edn. forthcoming. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/decision-capacity/. Accessed 20 Aug 2014

  • Cherry MJ (2010) Non-consensual treatment is (nearly always) morally impermissible. J Law Med Ethics 38(4):789–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick D (2005) Commentary: test of capacity has little practical benefit. Br Med J 331:1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cholbi M (2009) Tonkens on the irrationality of the suicidally mentally ill. J Appl Philos 26(1):102–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craige J (2013) Introduction: mental capacity and value neutrality. Int J Law Context 9(SI 01):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culver CM, Gert B (1982) Philosophy in medicine: conceptual and ethical issues in medicine and psychiatry. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson J (2008) Mental capacity and psychiatric admission. Br Med J 337:5–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2005) Mental capacity act. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2015) Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimond B (2008) Legal aspects of nursing, 5th edn. Pearson Education, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresser R (1996) Mentally disabled research subjects: the enduring policy issues. JAMA 276(1):67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin G (1988) The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards RB (1982) Mental health as rational autonomy. In: Edwards RB (ed) Psychiatry and ethics. Prometheus, New York, pp 68–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Etchells E, Darzins P, Silberfeld M, Singer PA, McKenny J, Naglie G, Katz M, Guyatt GH, Molloy DW, Strang D (1999) Assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment. J Gen Intern Med 14:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay B (1996) Contemporary philosophy of social science. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary J (2003) Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:398–1403

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham G (1998) Philosophy of mind: an introduction, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso T, Appelbaum PS (1995) The MacArthur Competence Treatment Study: III. Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatments. Law Hum Behav 19:149–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso T, Appelbaum PS, Hill-Fotouhi C (1997) The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatr Serv 48:1415–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttenplan S (1999) A companion to the philosophy of mind. Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt J (2010) Rational suicide: philosophical perspectives on schizophrenia. Med Health Care Philos 13:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt J, Edwards SD (2006) Moral perspectives on the prevention of suicide in mental health settings. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 13:665–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindmarch T, Hotopf M, Owen GS (2013) Depression and decision-making capacity for treatment or research: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics 14:54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotopf M (2005) The assessment of mental capacity. Clin Med 5(6):580–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob R, Gunn MJ, Holland A (eds) (2013) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett M, Bowers L, Simpson A (2008) Coerced medication in psychiatric inpatient care: literature review. J Adv Nurs 64:538–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen UJ, Mooney G (eds) (1990) Changing values in medical and healthcare decision-making. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Keinan G (1987) Decision making under stress: scanning of alternatives under controllable and uncontrollable threats. J Pers Soc Psychol 52:639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Chua S, McKenna P, David A (1997) Reasoning and delusions. Br J Psychiatry 170:398–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Appelbaum P, Swan J, Stroup S, McEvoy J, Goff D, Jeste D, Lanberti S, Leibovici A, Caine E (2007) Determining when impairment constitutes incapacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research. Br J Psychiatry 191:38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz AR, Dobson KS, Romney DM (2003) Insight in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Res 61(1):75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RM, Beauchamp T, Miller VA, Reynolds W, Ittenbach RF, Luce MF (2011) The concept of voluntary consent. Am J Bioeth 11:6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson T, Cutter W, Hotopf M (2008) Assessing mental capacity: the Mental Capacity Act. Br Med J 336:322–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt L (2007) Rationality and compulsion. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okai D, Owen G, McGuire H, Singh S, Churchill R, Hotopf M (2007) Mental capacity in psychiatric patients. Br J Psychiatry 191:291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen G, Cutting J, David A (2007) Are people with schizophrenia more logical than healthy volunteers? Br J Psychiatry 191:453–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen G, Richardson G, David A, Szmukler G, Hayward P, Hotopf M (2008) Mental capacity to make decisions on treatment in people admitted to psychiatric hospitals: cross sectional study. Br Med J 337:448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich K (2011) Rationality and the reflective mind. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Svavarsdottir S (2008) The virtue of practical rationality. Philos Phenomenol Res 77:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szmukler G, Appelbaum PS (2008) Treatment pressures, leverage, coercion, and compulsion in mental health care. J Ment Health 17:233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschanz JT, Corcoran CD, Schwartz S, Treiber K, Green RC, Norton MC, Lyketsos CG (2011) Progression of cognitive, functional and neuropsychiatric symptom domains in a population cohort with Alzheimer’s dementia the cache county dementia progression study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 19(6):532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varelius J (2003) Autonomy, subject-relativity, and subjective and objective theories of well-being in bioethics. Theor Med 24:363–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace RJ. Practical reason. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Summer 2014 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/practical-reason/. Accessed 2 Sept 2014

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeanette Hewitt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hewitt, J. (2015). Mental Capacity of Adult Patients in Health Care. In: Schramme, T., Edwards, S. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_28-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_28-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8706-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics