Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceptualization of Genetic Disease

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine

Abstract

The expression “genetic disease” suggests the idea that one or more genes cause a disease. Since the identification of the so-called disease-causing genes, many genetic variants associated with common diseases such as diabetes or cancer have been identified. But if the involvement of genetic factors in the development of a condition justifies labeling it “genetic,” the definition of genetic disease is likely to become trivial. Indeed, all human diseases would be genetic, since virtually every medical condition, disease susceptibility, or response to treatment is caused, regulated, or influenced by genes. Moreover, genes alone are not responsible for the development of diseases: their etiology is complex with many factors interacting with each other. So when is giving primary importance to genetic factors justified? The history of medicine may help us see which biological and technological advances have influenced conceptualization of genetic disease, while philosophical analyses of the causal selection problem may help us better understand how one might justify claims that genes are the main causes of certain diseases. The last part of the article examines interactionist attempts to deal with genetic factors involved in human diseases and particularly network medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Badano JL, Katsani N (2002) Human genetics and disease: beyond Mendel: an evolving view of human genetic disease transmission. Nat Rev Genet 3(10):779–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási AL (2007) Network medicine: from obesity to the “diseasome”. N Engl J Med 357:404–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási AL, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J (2011) Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet 12(1):56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates GP (2005) History of genetic disease: the molecular genetics of Huntington disease – a history. Nat Rev Genet 6(10):766–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ (eds) (2000) The concept of the gene in development and evolution. Historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun P, Rietman E, Vidal M (2008) Networking metabolites and diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(29):9849–9850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caspi A, McClay J, Moffitt TE et al (2002) Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 297:851–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Parmigiani G (2007) Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol 25(11):1329–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhu J, Lum PY et al (2008) Variations in DNA elucidate molecular networks that cause disease. Nature 452:429–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dausset J (1972) Correlation between histocompatibility antigens and susceptibility to illness. Prog Clin Immunol 1:183–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Dausset J (1996) Predictive medicine. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 65:29–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekeuwer C (2015) Defining genetic disease. In: Huneman P, Lambert G, Silberstein M (eds) Classification, disease and evidence. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 147–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipple KM, McCabe ERB (2000) Modifier genes convert “simple” Mendelian disorders to complex traits. Mol Genet Metab 71:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein CJ (2006) Medical genetics in the genomic medicine of the 21st century. Am J Hum Genet 79(3):434–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friebel TM, Domchek SM, Rebbeck TR (2014) Modifiers of cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 106(6):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galas DJ, Hood L (2009) Systems biology and emerging technologies will catalyze the transition from reactive medicine to predictive, personalized, preventive and participatory medicine. Interdiscip Biol Central 1(2):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gannett L (1999) What’s in a cause? The pragmatic dimensions of genetic explanations. Biol Philos 14:349–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford F (1990) Genetic traits. Biol Philos 5(3):327–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedgecoe AM (2002) Reinventing diabetes: classification, division and the geneticization of disease. New Genet Soc 21(1):7–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedgecoe AM (2003) Expansion and uncertainty: cystic fibrosis, classification and genetics. Sociol Health Illn 25(1):50–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesslow G (1984) What is a genetic disease? On the relative importance of causes. In: Nordenfelt L, Lindahl BIB (eds) Health, disease, and causal explanations in medicine. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 183–193

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hesslow G (1988) The problem of causal selection. In: Hilton DJ (ed) Contemporary science and natural explanation: commonsense conceptions of causality. Harvester Press, Brighton, pp 11–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoedemaekers R, Ten Have HAMJ (1998) Geneticization: the Cyprus paradigm. J Med Philos 23(3):274–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood L (2004) Systems biology and the New technologies enable predictive and preventative medicine. Science 306(5696):640–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood L, Flores M (2012) A personal view on systems medicine and the emergence of proactive P4 medicine: predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory. N Biotechnol 29(6):613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr A (2004) Giving up on geneticization: a comment on Hedgecoe’s “Expansion and uncertainty: cystic fibrosis, classification and genetics”. Sociol Health Illn 26(1):102–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr A (2005) Understanding genetic disease in a socio-historical context: a case study of cystic fibrosis. Sociol Health Illn 27(7):873–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P (2003) Battling the undead. How (and how not) to resist genetic determinism. In: Kitcher P (ed) In Mendel’s mirror. Philosophical reflections on biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp p283–p300

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (2000) The triple helix: gene, organism and environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman A (1991) Prenatal genetic testing and screening: constructing needs and reinforcing inequalities. Am J Law Med 17:11–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Loscalzo J, Kohane I, Barabási AL (2007) Human disease classification in the postgenomic era: a complex system approach to human pathobiology. Mol Syst Biol 3(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnus D (2004) The concept of genetic disease. In: Caplan AL, McCartney JJ, Sisti DA (eds) Health, disease, and illness: concepts in medicine. Georgetown University Press, Washington, pp 233–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ et al (2009) Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461(7265):747–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra S (2013) Human gene therapy: a brief overview of the genetic revolution. JAPI 61:127–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin D, Lindee MS (1995) The DNA mystique: the gene as a cultural icon. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Norell S (1984) Models of causation in epidemiology. In: Nordenfelt L, Lindahl BIB (eds) Health, disease, and causal explanations in medicine. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama S (1985) The ontogeny of information: developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich DE, Lander ES (2001) On the allelic spectrum of human disease. Trends Genet 17(9):502–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GD (2007) Towards an adequate account of genetic disease. In: Kincaid H, McKitrick J (eds) Establishing medical reality – essays in the metaphysics and epistemology of biomedical science. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 83–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tabery J (2007) Biometric and developmental gene–environment interactions: looking back, moving forward ». Dev Psychopathol 19(4):961–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabery J (2009) From a genetic predisposition to an interactive predisposition: rethinking the ethical implications of screening for gene-environment interactions. J Med Philos 34(1):27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Welcome Trust Case Control Consortium (2007) Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447:661–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visscher PM, Brown MA, McCarthy MI et al (2012) Five years of GWAS discovery. Am J Hum Genet 90(1):7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Menche J, Barabási AL et al (2014) Human symptoms–disease network. Nat Commun 5:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Online Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jean Moulin University Lyon III, Lyon, France

    Catherine Dekeuwer

Authors
  1. Catherine Dekeuwer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Dekeuwer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

    Thomas Schramme

  2. Philosophy, History and Law, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom

    Steven Edwards

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Dekeuwer, C. (2017). Conceptualization of Genetic Disease. In: Schramme, T., Edwards, S. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8688-1_81

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation