Skip to main content

An Overview of Bladder Augmentation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neurourology
  • 1237 Accesses

Abstract

Bladder augmentation or augmentation cystoplasty (AC) is generally acceptable therapy for a small-volume, high-pressure bladder. The purpose of AC is to increase bladder storage capacity, decrease bladder pressure, improve bladder compliance (BC), protect UUT function, provide continence, resist infection, and offer a convenient method of voluntary and complete bladder emptying. The technique has been in existence for >100 years, and has recently been performed laparoscopically or robotically. Currently, the AC techniques available in clinical practice include intestinal cystoplasty (ileum), colocystoplasty (sigmoid), gastrocystoplasty (stomach), ureterocystoplasty, autoaugmentation (vesicomyotomy), seromuscular augmentation, and tissue engineering cystoplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tizzoni G, Foggi A. Die weiderherstellung der harnblase. Zentralbl Chir. 1888;15:921–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. von Mikulicz J. Zur Operation der angeborenen Blasenspalte. Centralbl Chir. 1899;26:641–3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Couvelaire R. La petite vessie des tuberculeux génito-urinaires: essai de classification, places et variantes des cysto-intestinoplasties. J Urol Medicale Chir. 1950;56:381–434.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Charghi A, Charbonneau J, Gauthier GE. Colocystoplasty for bladder enlargement and bladder substitution: a study of late results in 31 cases. J Urol. 1967;97:849–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bisgard JD. Substitution of the urinary bladder with a segment of sigmoid: an experimental study. Ann Surg. 1943;117:106–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinaiko E. Artificial bladder from segment of stomach and study of effect of urine on gastric secretion. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1956;102:433–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodwin WE, Winter CC, Barker WF. Cup-patch technique of ileocystoplasty for bladder enlargement or partial substitution. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1959;108:240–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bellinger MF. Ureterocystoplasty: a unique method for vesid augmentation in children. J Urol. 1993;149:811–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Couvelaire R. Agrandir la vessie. In: Chirurgie de la Vesie. Paris: Masson; 1955. p. 200–21.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shoemaker WC. Reversed seromuscular grafts in urinary tract reconstruction. J Urol. 1955;74:453–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav A, Hoenig DM, Figenshau R, Clayman RV. Bladder wall substitution with synthetic and non-intestinal organic materials. J Urol. 1998;159:628–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lapides J, Diokno AC, Gould FR, Lowe BS. Further observations on self-catheterization. J Urol. 1976;116:169–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bohne JW, Osborn RW, Hettle PJ. Regeneration of the urinary bladder in the dog following total cysteetomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1955;100:259–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Atala A, Bauer SB, Soker S, Yoo JJ, Retik AB. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet. 2006;367:1241–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Biers SM, Venn SN, Greenwell TJ. The past, present and future of augmentation cystoplasty. BJU Int. 2012;109:1280–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scales CD, Wiener JS. Evaluating outcomes of enterocystoplasty in patients with spina bifida: a review of the literature. J Urol. 2008;180:2323–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liao L, Zhang F, Chen G. Midterm outcomes of protection for upper urinary tract function by augmentation enterocystoplasty in patients with neurogenic bladder. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014;46:2117–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang F, Liao L. Sigmoidocolocystoplasty with ureteral reimplantation for treatment of neurogenic bladder. Urology. 2012;80:440–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liao LM, Zhang F, Chen G. New grading system for upper urinary tract dilation using magnetic resonance urography in patients with neurogenic bladder. BMC Urol. 2014;14:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liao LM. A new comprehensive classification system for both lower and upper urinary tract dysfunctionin patients with neurogenic bladder. Urol Int. 2015;94:244–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elliott SP, Meng MV, Anwar HP, Stoller ML. Complete laparoscopic ileal cystoplasty. Urology. 2002;59:939–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reyblat P, Ginsberg DA. Augmentation cystoplasty: what are the indications? Curr Urol Rep. 2008;9:452–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nadeau G, Herschorn S. Augmentation cystoplasty. BJU Int. 2001;88:511–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hendren WH, Hendren RB. Bladder augmentation: experience with 129 children and young adults. J Urol. 1990;144:445–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Filmer RB, Spencer JR. Malignancies in bladder augmentations and intestinal conduits. J Urol. 1990;143:671–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Duel BP, Gonzalez R, Barthold JS. Alternative techniques for augmentation cystoplasty. J Urol. 1998;159:998–1005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sajadi KP, Goldman HB. Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion for neurogenic LUTS: current indications. Curr Urol Rep. 2012;13:389–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Whitmore WF, Gittes RF. Reconstruction of the urinary tract by cecal and ileocecal cystoplasty: review of a 15-year experience. J Urol. 1983;129:494–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fromm D. Ileal resection, or disease, and the blind loop syndrome: current concepts of pathophysiology. Surgery. 1973;73:639–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nguyen DH, Bain MA, Salmonson KL, Ganesan GS, Burns MW, Mitchell ME. The syndrome of dysuria and hematuria in pediatric urinary reconstruction with stomach. J Urol. 1993;150:707–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Churchill BM, Aliabadi H, Landau EH, McLorie GA, Steckler RE, McKenna PH, et al. Ureteral bladder augmentation. J Urol. 1993;150:716–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoo JJ, Olson J, Atala A, Kim B. Regenerative medicine strategies for treating neurogenic bladder. Int Neurourol J. 2011;15:109–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang F, Liao L. Tissue engineered cystoplasty augmentation for treatment of neurogenic bladder using small intestinal submucosa: an exploratory study. J Urol. 2014;192:544–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Limin Liao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liao, L. (2019). An Overview of Bladder Augmentation. In: Liao, L., Madersbacher, H. (eds) Neurourology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7509-0_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7509-0_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7507-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7509-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics