Abstract
In the field of Fundamental Rights a process of convergence is going on in Europe. There are three protection levels which are autonomous but functionally interconnected: the national constitutions, the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) and, for the member states of the European Union, the EU Fundamental Rights Charter. A total convergence comes into effect when the EU Charter applies in the member states, alternatively to the national Constitution. The impact of the ECHR on the signatory states’ orders leads to a relative convergence by conceptual transfer. In Germany, the national fundamental rights have to be interpreted in the light of the ECHR independently from its internal rank equivalent to ordinary federal law. In UK the Human Rights Act has established a mechanism which effects the adaptation of legislation to the jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Human Rights Court. In France, Article 55 of the Constitution gives the ECHR primacy over internal legislation. The accession of the EU to the ECHR is not yet been realized but the influences of the Strasbourg jurisprudence are significant. The EU Charter has to be interpreted, in important parts, in the light of the ECHR. It seems justified to state that fundamental rights in Europe undergo a significant convergence process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See the allegedly opposite positions of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) particularly in the case Åkerberg Fransson (2013, para. 19–31) on the one hand and the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) in the case Antiterrordatei (FCC 2013, para. 88) on the other hand. See Burgorgue-Larsen 2013.
- 2.
See the text of the European Union Act 2008: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/7/contents.
- 3.
See the text of the European Union Act 2011: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/12/contents.
- 4.
Bibliography
Arnold, Rainer. 2009. The concept of European constitutional law. In The emergence of European constitutional law, XVIIth congress of the international association of comparative law, Utrecht 2006, National reports, ed. Arnold Rainer, 15–23. Sakkoulas: Athens. Bruylant: Brussels.
Arnold, Rainer. 2015. Substanzielle und funktionelle Effizienz des Grundrechtsschutzes im europäischen Konstitutionalismus. In Von der Kultur der Verfassung, Festschrift für Friedhelm Hufen zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Christian Bickenbach, Max-Emanuel Geis, and Markus Winkler, 3–10. München: C.H. Beck.
Arnold, Rainer. 2010. Le juge constitutionnel et la proportionnalité, Annuaire internationale de justice constitutionnelle, Institut Louis Favoreu, vol. XXV. 2009, 115–122. Paris: Economica, Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille.
Arnold, Rainer. 2014a. La Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenne comme gardienne de l’identité constitutionnelle des États membres. In Longcours, Mélanges en l’honneur de Pierre Bon, 49–56. Paris: Dalloz.
Arnold, Rainer. 2014b. L’État de droit comme fondement du constitutionnalisme européen. Revue Française de Droit Constitutionnel. Numéro spécial, 25 ans de droit constitutionnel, no 100: 769–776.
Arnold, Rainer, J. I. Martínez Estay, and F. Zuniga Urbina. 2012. El principio de proporcionalidad en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional. Estudios Constitucionales, Santiago de Chile, 10: 65–116.
Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence. 2013. Chronique de jurisprudence européenne comparée (2013). Revue du Droit Public et de la science politique en France et à l’étranger. L.G.D.J. Paris. No. 4–2014.1077–1113, 1078 et sequ.
Grabenwarter, Christoph, and Katharina Pabel. 2013. Commentary Art. 6 TEU. In The Treaty on European Union (TEU). A commentary, ed. Hermann-Josef Blanke and Stelio Mangiameli. Berlin: Springer. Para 86–93.
Hufen, Friedhelm. 2011. Staatsrecht II Grundrechte, 3rd ed, 124–125. München: C.H.Beck.
Silkenat, James R., James E. Hickey Jr., and Peter D. Barenboim (eds.). 2014. The legal doctrines of the rule of law and the legal state (Rechtsstaat). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.
Decisions
CJEU. 2011. Case C-411/10, N.S. (C-411/10) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and M. E. and Others (C-493/10) v Refugee Applications Commissioner and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform. Judgment (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011. ECLI:EU:C:2011:865.
CJEU. 2013. Case C-617/10, Åklagaren v Åkerberg Fransson, Judgment (Grand Chamber) of February 26, 2013, ECLI:EU:C:2013:105.
ECJ. 1964. Case C-6/64, Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L. Judgment of Juli 15, 1964. Reports of Cases 1964 01141, ECLI:EU:C:1964:66.
ECJ. 2004. Case C-36/02, Omega Spielhallen- und Automatenaufstellungs-GmbH v Oberbürgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn, Judgment (First Chamber) of December 14, 2004, Reports of Cases 2004 I-09609, ECLI:EU:C:2004:614.
ECJ. 1970. Case-11/70, Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel, Judgment of Dezember 17, 1970, Reports of Cases 1970 01125, ECLI:EU:C:1970:114.
ECtHR. 1995. Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), Judgment of 23 March 1995, Application no. 15318/89.
FCC. 1974. Decision of May 29, 1974, vol. 37, 271 et seq. – 2 BvL 52/71, Solange I.
FCC. 1983. Decision of December 15, 1983, vol. 65, 1 et seq. – 1 BvR 209/83, Volkszählung.
FCC. 1986. Order of October 22, 1986, vol. 73, 339 et seq. – 2 BvR 197/83, Solange II.
FCC. 1987. Decision of April 10, 1987, 2 BvR 1236/86, NJW 1987, 3077, Melchers.
FCC. 2009. Order of June 30, 2009-2 BvE 2/08. ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2009:es20090630.2bve000208.
FCC. 2010. Order of July 06, 2010, vol. 89, 155 et seq. – 2 BvR 2661/06, Mangold decision. ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rs20100706. http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/EN/2010/07/rs20100706_2bvr266106en.
FCC. 2013. Decision of April 24, 2013–1 BvR 1215/07, Antiterrordatei. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/rs20130424_1bvr121507.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arnold, R., Feldbaum, E. (2016). Aspects of Fundamental Rights Convergence in Europe with Some Comparative References to the Developments in Germany, United Kingdom and France. In: Arnold, R. (eds) The Convergence of the Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 52. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7465-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7465-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7463-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7465-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)