Skip to main content

Aspects of Fundamental Rights Convergence in Europe with Some Comparative References to the Developments in Germany, United Kingdom and France

  • Chapter
The Convergence of the Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe

Abstract

In the field of Fundamental Rights a process of convergence is going on in Europe. There are three protection levels which are autonomous but functionally interconnected: the national constitutions, the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) and, for the member states of the European Union, the EU Fundamental Rights Charter. A total convergence comes into effect when the EU Charter applies in the member states, alternatively to the national Constitution. The impact of the ECHR on the signatory states’ orders leads to a relative convergence by conceptual transfer. In Germany, the national fundamental rights have to be interpreted in the light of the ECHR independently from its internal rank equivalent to ordinary federal law. In UK the Human Rights Act has established a mechanism which effects the adaptation of legislation to the jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Human Rights Court. In France, Article 55 of the Constitution gives the ECHR primacy over internal legislation. The accession of the EU to the ECHR is not yet been realized but the influences of the Strasbourg jurisprudence are significant. The EU Charter has to be interpreted, in important parts, in the light of the ECHR. It seems justified to state that fundamental rights in Europe undergo a significant convergence process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the allegedly opposite positions of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) particularly in the case Åkerberg Fransson (2013, para. 19–31) on the one hand and the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) in the case Antiterrordatei (FCC 2013, para. 88) on the other hand. See Burgorgue-Larsen 2013.

  2. 2.

    See the text of the European Union Act 2008: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/7/contents.

  3. 3.

    See the text of the European Union Act 2011: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/12/contents.

  4. 4.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/eu-bill-to-include-parliamentary-sovereignty-clause.

Bibliography

  • Arnold, Rainer. 2009. The concept of European constitutional law. In The emergence of European constitutional law, XVIIth congress of the international association of comparative law, Utrecht 2006, National reports, ed. Arnold Rainer, 15–23. Sakkoulas: Athens. Bruylant: Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, Rainer. 2015. Substanzielle und funktionelle Effizienz des Grundrechtsschutzes im europäischen Konstitutionalismus. In Von der Kultur der Verfassung, Festschrift für Friedhelm Hufen zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Christian Bickenbach, Max-Emanuel Geis, and Markus Winkler, 3–10. München: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, Rainer. 2010. Le juge constitutionnel et la proportionnalité, Annuaire internationale de justice constitutionnelle, Institut Louis Favoreu, vol. XXV. 2009, 115–122. Paris: Economica, Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, Rainer. 2014a. La Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenne comme gardienne de l’identité constitutionnelle des États membres. In Longcours, Mélanges en l’honneur de Pierre Bon, 49–56. Paris: Dalloz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, Rainer. 2014b. L’État de droit comme fondement du constitutionnalisme européen. Revue Française de Droit Constitutionnel. Numéro spécial, 25 ans de droit constitutionnel, no 100: 769–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, Rainer, J. I. Martínez Estay, and F. Zuniga Urbina. 2012. El principio de proporcionalidad en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional. Estudios Constitucionales, Santiago de Chile, 10: 65–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence. 2013. Chronique de jurisprudence européenne comparée (2013). Revue du Droit Public et de la science politique en France et à l’étranger. L.G.D.J. Paris. No. 4–2014.1077–1113, 1078 et sequ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabenwarter, Christoph, and Katharina Pabel. 2013. Commentary Art. 6 TEU. In The Treaty on European Union (TEU). A commentary, ed. Hermann-Josef Blanke and Stelio Mangiameli. Berlin: Springer. Para 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufen, Friedhelm. 2011. Staatsrecht II Grundrechte, 3rd ed, 124–125. München: C.H.Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silkenat, James R., James E. Hickey Jr., and Peter D. Barenboim (eds.). 2014. The legal doctrines of the rule of law and the legal state (Rechtsstaat). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Decisions

  • CJEU. 2011. Case C-411/10, N.S. (C-411/10) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and M. E. and Others (C-493/10) v Refugee Applications Commissioner and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform. Judgment (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011. ECLI:EU:C:2011:865.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. 2013. Case C-617/10, Åklagaren v Åkerberg Fransson, Judgment (Grand Chamber) of February 26, 2013, ECLI:EU:C:2013:105.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECJ. 1964. Case C-6/64, Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L. Judgment of Juli 15, 1964. Reports of Cases 1964 01141, ECLI:EU:C:1964:66.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECJ. 2004. Case C-36/02, Omega Spielhallen- und Automatenaufstellungs-GmbH v Oberbürgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn, Judgment (First Chamber) of December 14, 2004, Reports of Cases 2004 I-09609, ECLI:EU:C:2004:614.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECJ. 1970. Case-11/70, Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel, Judgment of Dezember 17, 1970, Reports of Cases 1970 01125, ECLI:EU:C:1970:114.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECtHR. 1995. Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), Judgment of 23 March 1995, Application no. 15318/89.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCC. 1974. Decision of May 29, 1974, vol. 37, 271 et seq. – 2 BvL 52/71, Solange I.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCC. 1983. Decision of December 15, 1983, vol. 65, 1 et seq. – 1 BvR 209/83, Volkszählung.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCC. 1986. Order of October 22, 1986, vol. 73, 339 et seq. – 2 BvR 197/83, Solange II.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCC. 1987. Decision of April 10, 1987, 2 BvR 1236/86, NJW 1987, 3077, Melchers.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCC. 2009. Order of June 30, 2009-2 BvE 2/08. ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2009:es20090630.2bve000208.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCC. 2010. Order of July 06, 2010, vol. 89, 155 et seq. – 2 BvR 2661/06, Mangold decision. ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rs20100706. http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/EN/2010/07/rs20100706_2bvr266106en.

  • FCC. 2013. Decision of April 24, 2013–1 BvR 1215/07, Antiterrordatei. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/rs20130424_1bvr121507.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Arnold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arnold, R., Feldbaum, E. (2016). Aspects of Fundamental Rights Convergence in Europe with Some Comparative References to the Developments in Germany, United Kingdom and France. In: Arnold, R. (eds) The Convergence of the Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 52. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7465-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics