Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

End-of-Life Decisions in Neonatology from a Children’s Rights Perspective: Dutch Developments Examined

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Dilemmas for Critically Ill Babies

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 65))

Abstract

End-of-life decisions regarding severely suffering newborn infants remain one of the most difficult issues in health care. In the last two decades the Netherlands have witnessed several developments regarding this issue. New research results and policy developments on legal and medical aspects of neonatal end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands have vitalized the Dutch debate once more and provide good cause for further reflection on specific issues. This chapter offers a reflection on several issues in current neonatal end-of-life practice in the Netherlands and discusses how these issues relate to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Concluding observations of the Human Right Committee: Netherlands. Seventy-second session, 20/07/01, CCPR/CO/72/NET.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The studies of Van der Maas and Van der Wal revealed that physicians are still reluctant to report such cases to the judicial authorities. See van der Heide A, van der Maas PJ, van der Wal et al G. Medical end-of-life decisions made for neonates and infants in the Netherlands. Lancet 1997;350(9073):251–255; Vrakking AM, van der Heide A, Arts et al WF. Medical end-of-life decisions for children in the Netherlands. Archives Pediatrics Adolescent Med 2005;159(9):802–809. This conclusion was confirmed in van de Vathorst S c.s. Evaluatie Regeling deskundigen commissie late zwangerschapsafbreking in een categorie-2 geval en levensbeëindiging bij pasgeborenen. Den Haag: ZonMw, 2013, pp. 102–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Fourth Periodic Report of the Kingdom of the Netherlands concerning the Implementation of the International Convention on the Rights of the Child (October 2006–December 2012), 2013, Annex blg-266402 of a Letter on 28th November 2013 (kst-26150–134) to the Second Chamber of Dutch Parliament. On the draft of this Report, see Annex of Parliamentary Papers II 2011–2012, 26150, nr. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  4. An international legal perspective on the matter is presented in Dorscheidt JHHM. Legal aspects of end-of-life decisions in neonatology. In: Roy GB, editor. Legal and Forensic medicine. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013, pp. 1175–200.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Decree of 29 April 1994, Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 1994, 321.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aanwijzing vervolgingsbeslissing levensbeëindiging niet op verzoek en late zwangerschapsafbreking,(GovernmentGazette (Staatscourant) 6 Mar 2007, nr. 46, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A legally substantiated plea for such a committee can be found in Dorscheidt JHHM. Assessment procedures regarding end-of-life decisions in neonatology in the Netherlands. Med Law 2005;24:803–829.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Combined Annual Report of the Committee on late termination of pregnancy and ending of neonatal life 2009–2010, The Hague 2011, p. 6 and pp. 21–3. Up to this date (May 2015) no other cases were reported. See the Committee’s Combined Annual Report 2011–2012, The Hague, 2013, p. 6 as well as Parliamentary Papers II 2013–2014, 33750 XVI, nr. 110, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Protocol is discussed by Verhagen AAE, Lantos JD. The groningen protocol. In: Diekema DS, Mercurio MR, Adam MB, editors. Clinical ethics in pediatrics. a case-based textbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 131–6. A medical update is presented by Verhagen AAE. Neonatal Euthanasia: lessons from the groningen protocol. Seminars Fetal Neonat Med 2014;19:296–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dorscheidt JHHM. Levensbeëindiging bij gehandicapte pasgeborenen. Strijdig met het non-discriminatiebeginsel? The Hague: SduUitgeverij, 2006. See also Dorscheidt JHHM. End-of-life decisions in neonatology and the right to life of the disabled newborn child: impressions from the Netherlands. In: Clements L, Read J, editors. Disabled people and the right to life, the protection and violation of disabled people’s most basic human right. Oxford: Routledge, 2008, pp. 176–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Verhagen AAE, Dorscheidt JHHM, Engels B, Hubben JH, Sauer PJJ. End-of-life decisions in severely ill newborns in the Dutch NICU. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(10):895–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. In 3 of the 150 cases in group II, data regarding the death of the particular child could not be traced due to a lack of information on who was the physician in charge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Verhagen AAE, De Vos M, Dorscheidt JHHM, Engels B, Hubben JH, Sauer PJJ. Conflicts about end-of-life decisions in NICUs in the Netherlands. Pediatrics 2009;124:e-112–e-119.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parliamentary Papers II 2005–2006, 30300 XVI, nr. 90, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dutch Health Council. Overwegingen bij het beëindigen van het leven van pasgeborenen, Signalering ethiek en gezondheid 2007/1. The Hague, pp. 35–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Verhagen AAE, van der Hoeven MA, Goudoever JB, de Vries MC, Van Schouten-Van Meete-ren AY, Alberts MJ. Uitzichtloos en ondraaglijk lijden en actieve levensbeëindiging bij pasgeborenen. Dutch J Med. 2007;151(26):1474–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dorscheidt JHHM, for an in-depth discussion of this question. In: Clements L, Read J, editors., Open circuits pp. 182–186.

    Google Scholar 

  18. For a further reflection on this question as well as others in relation to the parental perspective, see Dorscheidt JHHM, Verhagen AAE, Sauer PJJ, Hubben JH. Parental involvement in end-of-life decisions in neonatology: legal considerations with regard to Dutch medical practice. Med Law Int 2011;11(1):1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Verhagen AAE, Dorscheidt JHHM, Engels B, Hubben JH, Sauer PJJ. Analgesics, sedatives and neuromuscular blockers as part of end-of-life decisions in Dutch NICUs. Arch Dis Childhood Fetal Neonat Ed. 2009;94(6):F434–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. According to the national multidisciplinary expert committee the use of muscle relaxants in the terminal phase equals active ending of life. For the purpose of pain relief other medication should be administered. See Combined Annual Report 2009–2010, Open Circuit, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dorscheidt JHHM, Verhagen AAE, Sauer PJJ, Hubben JH. Medication regimes in the context of end-of-life decisions in neonatology: legal considerations with regard to Dutch NICU-practice. Med Law 31.

    Google Scholar 

  22. van de Vathorst S c.s. Evaluatie Regeling deskundigencommissie late zwangerschapsafbreking in een categorie-2 geval en levensbeëindiging bij pasgeborenen, Den Haag: ZonMw, 2013, pp. 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Parliamentary Papers II 2013–2014, 33750 XVI, nr. 110, pp. 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Royal Dutch MedicalAssociationPosition Statement (KNMG-Standpunt): Medische beslissingen rond het levenseinde bij pasgeborenen met zeer ernstige afwijkingen, Utrecht, May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See http://medischcontact.artsennet.nl/Actueel/Nieuws/Nieuwsbericht/133294/Arts-mag-leven-pasgeborene-beeindigen.htm. Viewed—once again—in Dec 2014.

  26. See the experts committee’s letter to the Dutch Minister of Health Care, 16 Sept 2013. http://www.lzalp.nl/Images/Standpunt%20commissie%20LZALP%20inzake%20KNMG%20rapport%20pasgeborenen%202013_tcm14-37363.pdf.

  27. http://www.rug.nl/research/groningen-centre-for-law-and%20governance/organisatie/gckg/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Health Law, University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Oude Kijk in ‘t Jatstraat 26, Groningen, 9766PB, Netherlands

    Jozef Dorscheidt

Authors
  1. Jozef Dorscheidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jozef Dorscheidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of. Pediatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Eduard Verhagen

  2. Montreal, Québec, Canada

    Annie Janvier

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dorscheidt, J. (2016). End-of-Life Decisions in Neonatology from a Children’s Rights Perspective: Dutch Developments Examined. In: Verhagen, E., Janvier, A. (eds) Ethical Dilemmas for Critically Ill Babies. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7360-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation