Skip to main content

Art and Sustainability

  • Chapter
Sustainability Science

Abstract

Over the past four decades, approaches to persistent and complex sustainability challenges have relied on solutions developed through scientific problem analysis and subsequent decision-making. Recently, this assumption has been exposed to various criticisms pointing out flaws and a lack of success. Art occupies a different intellectual, creative, and social space that can allow for surprising and promising perspectives and outcomes, offering innovative approaches to address sustainability problems. Since the 1990s, there has been a surge in interest among artists, curators, and theorists in collaborative art practice. Engaging directly with specific audiences and with pressing issues, the artists produce works that range in their intent from encouraging reflection, conversation, and learning to developing concrete solutions. This chapter focuses on the confluence of our heightened sustainability challenges with an increasing willingness among artists to address them and socially engaged practice as a particularly conducive art form. We focus on visual art and artists, although the most successful projects span disciplines and engage constituencies to challenge existing assumptions and propose new models.

The role of artworks is no longer to form imaginary and utopian realities, but to actually be ways of living and models of action within the existing real, whatever the scale chosen by the artist.

(Bourriaud, Relational Aesthetics, 2002, p. 13)

Artists cannot change the world…alone. But when they make a concerted effort, they collaborate with life itself, working with and between other disciplines and audiences, and given the chance to be seriously considered outside the rather narrow world of art, they can offer visual jolts and subtle nudges to conventional knowledge.

(Lippard, Weather Report, 2007, p. 6)

A more functional relationship between art and the everyday is urgently needed, through which artists can act as interlocutors…intervening in the debate itself and mediating new forms of acting and living.

(Teddy Cruz in Thompson, Living as Form, 2012, p. 58)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Danish word “kilen” means “wedge” in English.

  2. 2.

    The sources highlighted with an asterisk (*) are recommended as further readings.

References and Additional Readings

The sources highlighted with an asterisk (*) are recommended as further readings.

  • Andrews M (ed) (2006) Land, art: a cultural ecology handbook, 1st edn. RSA/Arts Council, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Benessia A, Funtowicz S, Bradshaw G, Ferri F, Medina CP, Raez-Luna EF (2012) Hybridizing sustainability: towards a new praxis for the present human predicament. Sustain Sci 7(1):75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop C (2006) The social turn – collaboration and its discontents. Artforum 2006:178–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop C (2012) Artificial hells. Verso, London/Brooklyn, 390 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud N (2002) Relational aesthetics. Les Presses Du Reel, France

    Google Scholar 

  • *Demos TJ (2009) The politics of sustainability: art and ecology. In: Manacorda F, Yedgar A (eds) Radical nature: art and architecture for a changing planet 1969–2009. Koenig Books/Barbican Art Gallery, London, pp 17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Demos TJ (ed) (2013) Contemporary art and the politics of ecology. Third Text 27(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelpearl T (2001) Dialogues in public art. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelpearl T (2013) What we made: conversations on art and social cooperation. Duke University Press, Durham/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieling R, Atkins R, Groys B, Manovich L (2009) The art of participation: 1950 to now. San Francisco Museum of Modern Art/Thames & Hudson, San Francisco/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannachi G (2012) Representing, performing and mitigating climate change in contemporary art practice. Leonardo 45(2):125–131. MIT Press

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Helguera P (2011) Education for socially engaged art: a materials and techniques handbook. Jorge Pinto Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S (2011) Social works: performing art, supporting publics. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan S, Kirchberg V (2008) Sustainability: a new frontier for the arts and cultures. VAS, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastner J (ed) (2010) Land and environmental art. Phaidon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester G (2008) Conversation pieces: community and communication in modern art. The University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester G (2011) The one and the many: contemporary collaborative art in a global context. Duke University Press, Durham/London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon M (2004) One place after another. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy S (ed)(1995) Mapping the terrain: new genre public art. Bay Press, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • *Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas C (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science – practice, principles and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(Suppl 1):25–43

    Google Scholar 

  • *Lineberry HS (ed) (2010) Defining sustainability. ASU Art Museum, Tempe

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippard LR (2007) Weather report: art and climate change. Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art with EcoArts, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz D, Clapp R, Crumbley C, Kriebel D, Tickner J (2012) The sustainability solutions agenda. New Solut 22(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Smith S (2005) Beyond green: toward a sustainable art. Smart Museum of Art, the University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • *Thompson N (2012) Living as form: socially engaged art from 1991–2011. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • *Wiek A, Ness B, Brand FS, Schweizer-Ries P, Farioli F (2012) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7(Suppl 1):5–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Sealy Lineberry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lineberry, H.S., Wiek, A. (2016). Art and Sustainability. In: Heinrichs, H., Martens, P., Michelsen, G., Wiek, A. (eds) Sustainability Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7242-6_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics