Skip to main content

Using Life Cycle Analysis to Analyse the Environmental Performances of Organic and Non-organic Apple Orchards

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organic Farming, Prototype for Sustainable Agricultures

Abstract

Although the conventional farming system (CV) for apple production remains the common practice worldwide, the organic farming system (OF) is becoming increasingly important. Few global assessments of the environmental impacts of organic orchard systems are currently available. In this work, we analyse the weak and strong points of the environmental performance of the growing phase of two organic and one conventional apple orchard, using a pluri-annual dataset from experimental orchard systems located in the Middle Rhone valley in France, with life cycle analysis (LCA). LCA, also referred to as cradle-to-grave analysis, allows a quantitative and global evaluation of an orchard’s environmental performance. The analysis was performed using the SALCA (Swiss Agricultural Life Cycle Assessment) method (SALCA-Crop V3.1, adapted for pome fruit) and included relevant impact categories based on characterisation models derived mainly from the EDIP97 and CML01 methods, as well as those developed by Agroscope (ART).

Seven impact categories that included ecotoxicity and human toxicity, as well as energy consumption and other environmental impact categories, were calculated and are discussed here. The OF systems appeared to have less of an impact than the conventional system, considering the surface-based functional unit (ha/year). However, the basic substitution of conventional with organic inputs or mechanised activities was not sufficient to radically improve the overall environmental performance of the orchard systems. These results need several years of full production to be validated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.eu-footprint.org/ (10.02.2010)

  2. 2.

    e.g. input productions and machinery use

  3. 3.

    compounds applied in the three management systems of apple orchards causing either aquatic or terrestrial ecotoxicity

References

  • Anton A, Castells F, Montero JI, Huijbregts M (2004) Comparison of toxicological impacts of integrated and chemical pest management in Mediterranean greenhouses. Chemosphere 54:1225–1235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bockstaller C, Guichard L, Keichinger O, Girardin P, Galan MB, Gaillard G (2009) Comparison of methods to assess the sustainability of agricultural systems. A review. Agro Sustain Develop 29:223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell SJ, Clift R (1997) Impact assessment for LCAs Life Cycle Assessments involving agricultural production. International J Life Cycle Assess 2:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard G, Nemecek T (2009) Swiss Agricultural Life Cycle Assessment (SALCA): an integrated environmental assessment concept for agriculture. Proceedings of the Conference on integrated assessment of agriculture and sustainable development: Setting the Agenda for Science and Policy (AgSAP 2009), Hotel Zuiderduin, Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands, 10–12 March 2009, pp. 134–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn H, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ, Lindeijer E, Roorda AAH, Weidema BP (2001) Life cycle assessment—an operational guide to the ISO standards. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment (VROM) and Centre of Environmental Science (CML), Den Haag and Leiden, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutsche V, Rossberg D (1997) SYNOPS 1.1: a model to assess and to compare the environmental risk potential of active ingredients in plant protection products. Agr Ecosyst Environ 64:181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutsche V, Strassemeyer J (2007) SYNOPS—a model to assess the environmental risk potential of pesticides. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes 59:197–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas G, Wetterich F, Kopke U (2001) Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agr Ecosyst Environ 83:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild M, Wenzel H (1998) Environmental assessment of products: scientific background. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi K, Nakagawa A, Itsubo N, Inaba A (2006) Expanded damage function of stratospheric ozone depletion to cover major endpoints regarding life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:150–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hischier R, Weidema B, Althaus HJ, Bauer C, Doka G, Dones R, Frischknecht R, Hellweg S, Humbert S, Jungbluth N, Köllner T, Loerinick Y, Margni M, Nemecek T (2009) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods In: Inventories S.C.f.L.C. (ed), Ecoinvent report, Dübendorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliet O, Muller-Wenk R, Bare J, Brent A, Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Itsubo N, Pena C, Pennington D, Potting J, Rebitzer G, Stewart M, de Haes HU, Weidema B (2004) The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:394–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kägi T, Bockstaller C, Gaillard G, Hayer F, Mamy L, Strassemer J (2008a) Multicriteria comparison of RA and LCA toxicity methods with focus on pesticide application strategies. 6th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector, Zurich, p. 414

    Google Scholar 

  • Kägi T, Casado D, Delval P, Gaillard G, Otto S, Strassemeyer J (2008b) Life cycle assessment of integrated and organic apple production systems in Europe. In: Network E (ed), Endure network meeting

    Google Scholar 

  • Milà i Canals L, Burnip GM, Cowell SJ (2006) Evaluation of the environmental impacts of apple production using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): case study in New Zealand. Agr Ecosyst Environ 114:226–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouron P, Scholz RW, Nemecek T, Weber O (2006) Life cycle management on Swiss fruit farms: relating environmental and income indicators for apple-growing. Ecol Eco 58:561–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Erzinger S (2005) Modelling representative life cycle inventories for Swiss arable crops. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:68–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, von Richthofen JS, Dubois G, Casta P, Charles R., Pahl H (2008) Environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes into European crop rotations. Euro J Agro 28:380–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Dubois D, Huguenin-Elie O, Gaillard G (2011) Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: I. Integrated and organic farming. Agr Syst 104:217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R, Hunkeler D, Norris G, Rydberg T, Schmidt WP, Suh S, Weidema BP, Pennington DW (2004) Life cycle assessment Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 30:701–720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reganold JP, Glover JD, Andrews PK, Hinman HR (2001) Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature 410:926–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rickerl D, Francis C (2004) Multidimentional thinking: a prerequisite to agroecology. In: Al-Amoodi L, Barbarick KA, Roberts CA, Dick WA (eds), Agroecosystems analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsi, USA, pp. 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauphanor B, Dirwimmer C, Boutin S, Chaussabel A-L, Dupont N, Fauriel J, Gallia V, Lambert N, Navarro E, Parisi L, Plenet D, Ricaud V, Sagnes J-L, Sauvaitre D, Simon S, Speich P, Zavagli, F (2009) ECOPHYTO R & D vers des systèmes de culture économes en produits phytosanitaires. INRA, p. 68

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon S, Brun L, Guinaudeau, J., Sauphanor B (2011) Pesticide use in current and innovativbe apple orchard systems. Agro Sustain Develop 31:541–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xavier JHV, Caldeira-Pires A (2004) Potencial use of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology for characterization of agriculture environmental impacts. CC & T, Cadernos de Ciencia & Tecnologia 21, 311–341

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aude Alaphilippe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: List of Pesticides and CML Toxicity Coefficient Used for Calculation

Appendix 1: List of Pesticides and CML Toxicity Coefficient Used for Calculation

Reference: SYNOPS database, see description in material and methods.

Active ingredient

Pesticide class

CML aquatic tox

CML terrestrial tox

CML human tox

Acetamiprid

Cyclic N-compounds

4.17E − 03

9.79E − 04

1.53E + 00

Acetic acid

Pesticide unspecified

9.61E − 01

8.17E − 02

7.04E + 00

Aminotriazole

Cyclic N-compounds

1.32E + 00

4.82E − 02

9.27E + 01

Ammonium thiocyanate

Pesticide unspecified

7.90E + 01

5.18E + 01

7.04E + 00

Azinphos-methyl

Organophosphorus-compounds

3.07E + 01

2.04E + 01

2.08E + 01

Beta-cyfluthrin

Pyretroid-compounds

8.88E + 00

1.35E + 01

1.35E + 01

Bupirimate

Cyclic N-compounds

2.27E + 00

2.32E − 01

1.26E + 01

Bacillus thurengensis

Pesticide unspecified

0.00E + 00

0.00E + 00

0.00E + 00

Calcium chloride

Pesticide unspecified

9.61E − 01

8.17E − 02

7.04E + 00

Captan

Phtalamide-compounds

2.83E − 03

1.44E − 02

1.72E − 01

Carbaryl

[Thio]Carbamate-compounds

1.63E − 01

6.87E − 02

5.15E + 01

Chlorpyrifos-methyl

Organophosphorus-compounds

6.17E + 01

2.64E + 01

5.02E − 01

Copper

Pesticide unspecified

5.55E + 01

1.48E + 00

9.61E + 00

Difenoconazole

Cyclic N-compounds

6.36E + 01

2.90E + 00

5.59E + 01

Dithianon

Nitrile-compounds

4.24E − 03

7.42E − 03

3.00E − 02

Diquat

Bipyridylium-compounds

4.57E + 02

5.06E + 02

2.06E + 03

Dodine

Pesticide unspecified

9,61E − 01

8,17E − 02

5,04E − 04

E, e−8, 10-dodecadiene−1-ol

Pesticide unspecified

0,00E + 00

0,00E + 00

0,00E + 00

Ethephon

Organophosphorus-compounds

1,17E − 02

5,86E − 03

9,35E − 02

Flonicamid

Cyclic N-compounds

1,07E − 01

6,57E − 03

8,08E + 00

Fluazifop-P-butyl

Diphenylether-compounds

7,64E − 03

5,49E − 03

8,10E + 00

Fludioxonil

Nitrile-compounds

4.02E − 02

1.17E − 02

3.73E − 02

Glufosinate-ammonium

Pesticide unspecified

1.55E − 03

2.46E − 04

1.26E + 00

Glyphosate

Organophosphorus-compounds

7.75E − 05

9.91E − 06

8.90E − 03

Granulosevirus

Pesticide unspecified

0.00E + 00

0.00E + 00

0.00E + 00

Isoxaben

Acetamide-anillide-compounds

1.48E + 00

8.70E − 02

1.24E + 01

Kresoxim-methyl

Pesticide unspecified

1.76E + 01

9.20E − 01

2.62E − 01

Mancozeb

Dithiocarbamate-compounds

6.38E − 04

9.30E − 04

1.08E − 02

Oryzalin

Dinitroaniline-compounds

1.45E − 1

2.69E − 02

1.09E + 1

Oxydemeton-methyl

Organophosphorus-compounds

2.42E + 01

2.40E + 00

1.29E + 03

Paraffin (C18–C30)

Pesticide unspecified

4.02E − 4

5.2143E−05

0.00E + 00

Paraffin (C11–C25)

Pesticide unspecified

2.33E − 3

6.33E−3

0.00E + 00

Pyridaben

Pesticide unspecified

8.96E + 1

1.71E + 2

1.05E + 2

Phosmet

Organophosphorus-compounds

2.34E − 02

6.45E − 02

8.91E − 02

Pyrimethanil

Acetamide-anillide-compounds

1.03E + 02

4.03E + 00

8.46E + 00

Rotenone

Pesticide unspecified

4.50E − 02

3.69E − 02

7.04E + 00

Spinosad

Pesticide unspecified

3.65E − 01

3.58E − 02

2.20E − 01

Sulfur

Pesticide unspecified

1.04E − 1

2.32E − 2

0.00E + 00

Thiacloprid

Nitrile-compounds

4.64E − 03

1.00E − 03

1.37E + 00

Thiophanate-methyl

[Thio]Carbamate-compounds

2.63E − 01

2.44E − 02

2.15E + 00

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alaphilippe, A., Simon, S., Hayer, F. (2014). Using Life Cycle Analysis to Analyse the Environmental Performances of Organic and Non-organic Apple Orchards. In: Bellon, S., Penvern, S. (eds) Organic Farming, Prototype for Sustainable Agricultures. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7927-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics