Skip to main content

Pulling Learning Through: Building the Profession’s Skills in Making Use of Workplace Coaching Opportunities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Workplace Learning in Teacher Education

Abstract

This chapter explores what we know about professional learning and ways of supporting it. It uses coaching (a structured, sustained process for enabling the development of a specific aspect of a professional learner’s practice) as a case study of how this evidence is being played out on the ground in England during the second decade of the twenty-first century. It draws extensively on work carried out by the Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education (CUREE), first to support the development of the compulsory coaching element within the Government’s pilot of a Master’s in Teaching and Learning; second to support quality and depth in coaching; and third to evaluate the effectiveness of schools as professional learning environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Timperley’s definitions of professional development and learning discussed earlier in the chapter.

  2. 2.

    The Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), part of the Social Science Research Unit at the Institute of Education, University of London, is the centre for systematic review work in social science and public policy in the UK.

  3. 3.

    See http://www.tlrp.org/.

  4. 4.

    http://www.curee.co.uk/files/publication/1219313968/mentoring_and_coaching_national_framework.pdf.

References

  • Adey, P. (2002). The role of in-service professional development of science teachers in large-scale changes in teaching practice: A look at Britain and Indonesia. In P. Fraser-Abder (Ed.), Professional development of science teachers: Local insights with lessons for the global community (pp. 158–171). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., Cordingley, P., & Mitchell, H. (2006). The impact of networks on pupil, practitioners, organisations and the communities they serve. Cranfield: National College for School Leadership (NCSL). http://www.nationalcollege.org.uk/download?id=133214 & filename=nlc-impact-of-networks-on-pupils-practitioners-organisations-and-communities.pdf.

  • Bolam, R., & Weindling, D. (2006). Synthesis of research and evaluation projects concerned with capacity-building through teachers’ professional development. London: General Teaching Council for England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., Hawkey, K., Ingram, M., Atkinson, A., & Smith, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining professional learning communities. Research report 637. London: Department for Education & Skills (DfES) and University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann, M. (1984). The priority of knowledge and understanding in teaching. In L. Katz & J. Raths (Eds.), Advances in teacher education (Vol. 1, pp. 29–48). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burn, K., Hagger, H., & Mutton, T. (2008). Strengthening and sustaining learning in the second year of teaching. Paper presented at: The annual conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh: 3–6 September 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordingley, P. (2008). Sauce for the goose: Learning entitlements that work for teachers as well as their pupils. Coventry: Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence (CUREE). http://www.curee.co.uk/resources/publications/sauce-goose-leaflet-pdf-format. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.

  • Cordingley, P., & Buckler, N. (2012). Professional learning environments in primary and secondary contexts. Paper presented at BERA Annual Conference, University of Manchester, University of Manchester, 4–5 September, 2012. Session 3.29: 11.00–12.30 Wednesday 5 September 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Rundell, B., & Evans, D. (2003). The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Thomason, S., & Firth, A. (2005a). The impact of collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) on classroom teaching and learning. Review: How do collaborative and sustained CPD and sustained but not collaborative CPD affect teaching and learning? London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Evans, D., & Firth, A. (2005b). The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning. Review: What do teacher impact data tell us about collaborative CPD? London: EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Isham, C., Evans, D., & Firth, A. (2007). What do specialists do in CPD programmes for which there is evidence of positive outcomes for pupils and teachers? Technical report. In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordingley, P., Buckler, N., & Bell, M. (2011). Professional learning and the role of the coach in the new Masters in Teaching and Learning (MTL): Technical report. Coventry: Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education (CUREE). http://www.curee.co.uk/files/publication/[site-timestamp]/CUREE%20MTL%20technical%20report%20FINAL%20rev.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2012.

  • CUREE (Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education). (2005). Mentoring and coaching national framework. London: DFES. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110809101133/nsonline.org.uk/node/132345. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.

  • Day, C. (1993). The development of teachers’ thinking and practice: Does choice lead to empowerment? In J. Elliott (Ed.), Reconstructing teacher education: Teacher development. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., Stobart, G., Sammons, P., Alison Kington, A., Gu, K., Smees, R., & Tamjid Mujtaba, T. (2006). Variations in teachers’ work, lives and effectiveness. London: Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (Research Report 743).

    Google Scholar 

  • DfES. (2004). Primary national strategy: Intensifying support programme. London: Department for Education and Skills. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110809101133/wsassets.s3.amazonaws.com/ws/nso/pdf/1c002e8d1a6baa8ec33d7c55c945ad7b.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.

  • DfES. (2005). Mentoring and coaching CPD capacity building project (2004–2005): National framework for mentoring and coaching. Coventry: CUREE & Department for Education and Skills. http://www.curee.co.uk/files/publication/1219313968/mentoring_and_coaching_national_framework.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.

  • Donaldson, M., & Neufeld, B. (2006). Collaborative coaching and learning in literacy: Implementation at four Boston public schools. Cambridge: Education Matters, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Karhenek, G. (2004). Whatever it takes: How professional learning communities respond when kids don’t learn. Bloomington: National Education Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L., Watson, N., Levin, B., Leithwood, Fullan, M., Torrance, N., Jantzi, D., Mascall, D., & Volante, L. (2003). Final report of the external evaluation of England’s national literacy and numeracy strategies. Ontario: University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L., Katz, S., Elgie, S., Jaafar, S., & Foster, L. (2006). How networked learning communities work: Volume 1—The report. Toronto: Aporia Consulting Ltd. http://networkedlearning.ncsl.org.uk/collections/network-research-series/reports/how-networked-learning-communities-work.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.

  • Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2001). Teachers learning in the workplace. In A. Kesidou (Ed.), Continuing teacher education and school development (pp. 54–68). Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, A. (2006). Participative learning through the work-based route: From apprenticeship to part-time higher education. European Journal of Vocational Education, 37, 68–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • GTC. (2003). Commitment: The teachers’ professional learning framework. London: General Teaching Council for England (GTC).

    Google Scholar 

  • GTC. (2005). Learning together: leading professional development (TPLF04) London: General Teaching Council for England. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/8256/1/tplf_learntog_pltog0405.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.

  • GTC. (2006). Professional learning framework: Peer observation. London: General Teaching Council for England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagger, H., Burn, K., Mutton, T., & Brindley, S. (2008). Practice makes perfect? Learning to learn as a teacher. Oxford Review of Education, 34(2), 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, H., & Hodkinson, P. (2005). Improving schoolteachers’ workplace learning. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 109–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hord, S., & Sommers, W. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. California: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, M., Black, P., McCormick, R., Pedder, D., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Learning how to learn, in classrooms, schools and networks: Aims, design and analysis. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keay, J., & Lloyd, C. (2007). Professional learning communities. Paper presented at: AARE 2007 International Educational Research Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leat, D. (1993). A conceptual model of competence. Journal of In-Service Education, 19(2), 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leat, D., Lofthouse, R., Cummings, C., & Hall, E. (2008). Developing an analytical framework for coaching sessions for use by new teachers. Paper presented at: The British Education Research Association Conference, 3–6 September, 2008, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofthouse, R., & Wright, D. (2008). Enquiring into practice: a new method of lesson observation. Paper presented at: the British Education Research Association Conference, 3–6 September, 2008, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, P., Lamont, E., Harland, J., Mitchell, H., & Straw, S. (2009). Evaluation of the GTC’s Teacher Learning Academy (TLA): Impacts on teachers, pupils and schools. London: General Teaching Council for England.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Strategy. (2005). Coaching and assessment for learning. London: Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2006). The logical chain: CPD in effective schools. London: Office for Standards in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2010). Good professional development in schools. London: Office for Standards in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudduck, J., & McIntyre, D. (Eds). (2007). Improving learning through consulting pupils. Teaching and Learning Research Programme (TLRP) Consulting Pupils Project Team. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 130–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, P. J., & Castleberry, M. S. (2000). Educators as learners: Creating a professional learning community in your school. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. (1998). When is experiential learning not experiential learning. In G. Claxton (Ed.), Liberating the learner: Lessons for professional development in education (pp. 16–31). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (2004). Conceptualizing vocational knowledge: Some theoretical considerations. In H. Rainbird, Fuller, A., & Munro, A. (Eds.), Workplace learning in context. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. (1996). Designing educative practicum experiences. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick & M. L. Gomez (Eds.), Currents of reform in preservice teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippa Cordingley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cordingley, P., Buckler, N. (2014). Pulling Learning Through: Building the Profession’s Skills in Making Use of Workplace Coaching Opportunities. In: McNamara, O., Murray, J., Jones, M. (eds) Workplace Learning in Teacher Education. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7826-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics