Skip to main content

Engineering as Performance: An “Experiential Gestalt” for Understanding Engineering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 15))

Abstract

There is a growing interest in exploring engineering practice, especially as it reveals that which might be considered essential or distinctive. However, such an exploration often constructs a dichotomous view that artificially separates science from non-science, the technical from the social; and thereby distorts what engineering actually is and what engineers really do. In this paper, I propose an alternative to that dichotomous view – engineering as performance. Like engineering practice, engineering as performance highlights the everyday activities of engineers, although the focus changes from what is essential or distinctive about those activities to the “performative accomplishment.” Consequently, the actual work of engineering and the real performances of engineers can now be viewed as a genuine ensemble that includes both science and non-science, the technical and the social.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bauman, R. (1977). Verbal art as performance. Rowley: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, R. (1986). Story, performance, event: Contextual studies in oral narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, R. (1992). Performance. In R. Bauman (Ed.), Folklore, cultural performances, and popular entertainments: A communications-centered handbook (pp. 41–49). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, C. (1999). Introduction: Changing regularities of genre. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990a). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990b). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In S.-E. Case (Ed.), Performing feminisms: Feminist critical theory and theatre (pp. 270–282). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. (1996). Performance: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., & Brodeur, D. (2007). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G. (1998). The machine in me: An anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G. (2005). Are engineers losing control of technology: From ‘problem solving’ to problem definition and solution’ in engineering education. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 83(A6), 583–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frehill, L. M., Carolyn Brandi, M., Amanda L., & Frampton, F. (2009). Women in engineering: A review of the 2009 literature. Society of Women in Engineering Magazine. http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/swe/summer10/#/50

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1975). Breakthrough into performance. In D. Ben-Amos & K. S. Goldstein (Eds.), Folklore: Performance and communication (pp. 11–74). The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (1998). Destination culture: Tourism, museums, and heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawley, A. L. (2009). Universalized narratives: Patterns in how faculty members define engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), The handbook of writing research (pp. 54–66). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechner, R. (1977). Essays on performance theory. New York: Drama Book Specialists.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schechner, R. (2002). Performance studies: An introduction. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S., Colby, A., Macatanggay, K., & Sullivan, W. (2006). What is engineering practice? International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 429–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2004). Communication patterns of engineers. Piscataway: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevelyan, J. (2007). Technical coordination in engineering practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevelyan, J. (2009). Steps toward a better model of engineering practice. Paper presented at the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Palm Cove, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1982). From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play. New York: Performing Arts Journal Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinck, D. (Ed.). (2003). Everyday engineering: An ethnography of design and innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsor, D. (1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rick Evans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans, R. (2013). Engineering as Performance: An “Experiential Gestalt” for Understanding Engineering. In: Michelfelder, D., McCarthy, N., Goldberg, D. (eds) Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics