Abstract
There is a growing interest in exploring engineering practice, especially as it reveals that which might be considered essential or distinctive. However, such an exploration often constructs a dichotomous view that artificially separates science from non-science, the technical from the social; and thereby distorts what engineering actually is and what engineers really do. In this paper, I propose an alternative to that dichotomous view – engineering as performance. Like engineering practice, engineering as performance highlights the everyday activities of engineers, although the focus changes from what is essential or distinctive about those activities to the “performative accomplishment.” Consequently, the actual work of engineering and the real performances of engineers can now be viewed as a genuine ensemble that includes both science and non-science, the technical and the social.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bauman, R. (1977). Verbal art as performance. Rowley: Newbury House.
Bauman, R. (1986). Story, performance, event: Contextual studies in oral narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bauman, R. (1992). Performance. In R. Bauman (Ed.), Folklore, cultural performances, and popular entertainments: A communications-centered handbook (pp. 41–49). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bazerman, C. (1999). Introduction: Changing regularities of genre. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(1), 1–2.
Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. New York: Continuum.
Bucciarelli, L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Butler, J. (1990a). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1990b). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In S.-E. Case (Ed.), Performing feminisms: Feminist critical theory and theatre (pp. 270–282). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Carlson, M. (1996). Performance: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., & Brodeur, D. (2007). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach. New York: Springer.
Downey, G. (1998). The machine in me: An anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York: Routledge.
Downey, G. (2005). Are engineers losing control of technology: From ‘problem solving’ to problem definition and solution’ in engineering education. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 83(A6), 583–595.
Frehill, L. M., Carolyn Brandi, M., Amanda L., & Frampton, F. (2009). Women in engineering: A review of the 2009 literature. Society of Women in Engineering Magazine. http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/swe/summer10/#/50
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Garden City: Doubleday.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hymes, D. (1975). Breakthrough into performance. In D. Ben-Amos & K. S. Goldstein (Eds.), Folklore: Performance and communication (pp. 11–74). The Hague: Mouton.
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (1998). Destination culture: Tourism, museums, and heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press.
National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
Pawley, A. L. (2009). Universalized narratives: Patterns in how faculty members define engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 309–319.
Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), The handbook of writing research (pp. 54–66). New York: The Guilford Press.
Schechner, R. (1977). Essays on performance theory. New York: Drama Book Specialists.
Schechner, R. (2002). Performance studies: An introduction. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Sheppard, S., Colby, A., Macatanggay, K., & Sullivan, W. (2006). What is engineering practice? International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 429–438.
Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (Wiley).
Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2004). Communication patterns of engineers. Piscataway: IEEE Press.
Trevelyan, J. (2007). Technical coordination in engineering practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 191–204.
Trevelyan, J. (2009). Steps toward a better model of engineering practice. Paper presented at the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Palm Cove, Australia.
Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. London: Cornell University Press.
Turner, V. (1982). From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play. New York: Performing Arts Journal Publication.
Vinck, D. (Ed.). (2003). Everyday engineering: An ethnography of design and innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Winsor, D. (1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Evans, R. (2013). Engineering as Performance: An “Experiential Gestalt” for Understanding Engineering. In: Michelfelder, D., McCarthy, N., Goldberg, D. (eds) Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7761-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7762-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)