Skip to main content

Impact of Scan Duration on PET/CT Maximum Standardized Uptake Value Measurement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Frontier and Future Development of Information Technology in Medicine and Education

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 269))

  • 127 Accesses

Abstract

Although readily available and convenient to use on PET/CT, SUV measurements are influenced by biologic and technologic factors like injected activity and scan duration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of varying scan duration on SUV using standard clinical activities of 18F-FDG. Patient PET/CT images were acquired in list-mode for 6 min in forty 18F-FDG oncology patients with known tumor. For each patient, data were sorted into 10 images of different durations (from 10 s to 6 min). SUVmax were measured for the lesions in the images. Tumor SUVmax were statistically analyzed taking the low-noise 6 min SUVmax as standard. For each of the nine scan duration from 10 s to 5 min, the normalized SUVmax were 1.080 ± 0.1611, 1.041 ± 0.1043, 1.005 ± 0.0732, 1.004 ± 0.0696, 1.005 ± 0.0456, 0.995 ± 0.0452, 0.996 ± 0.0299, 1.001 ± 0.0233, and 1.0002 ± 0.0144, respectively. One-sample t test revealed that the SUVmax biases for scan durations greater than 40 s were not statistically significant. It was concluded that scan duration as short as 40 s could be applied without compromising the quality of SUVmax measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Thie JA (2004) Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage. J Nucl Med 45(9):1431–1434

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams MC, Turkington TG, Wilson JM et al (2010) A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. Am J Roentgenol 195(2):310–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu Z, Wang W, Gualtieri EE, et al (2007) An LOR-based systematic and fully-3D PET image reconstruction using a blob-basis function. In: IEEE nuclear science symposium conference record, 2007 (NSS’07), vol 6. pp. 4415–4418)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borst GR, Belderbos JSA, Boellaard R et al (2005) Standardised FDG uptake: a prognostic factor for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 41:1533–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, et al (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 50(suppl):122S–150SS

    Google Scholar 

  6. Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I (2007) Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med 48(6):932–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ et al (2006) Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med 47(5):885–895

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barrington SF, Begent J, Lynch T et al (2008) Guidelines for the use of PET–CT in children. Nucl Med Commun 29(5):418–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boellaard R, O’Doherty M, Weber W et al (2010) FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(1):181–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tatsumi M, Clark P, Nakamoto Y et al (2003) Impact of body habitus on quantitative and qualitative image quality in wholebody FDG-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30(1):40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Halpern B, Dahlbom M, Quon A et al (2004) Impact of patient weight and emission scan duration on PET/CT image quality and lesion detectability. J Nucl Med 45(5):797–801

    Google Scholar 

  12. Watson C, Casey M, Bendriem B et al (2005) Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. J Nucl Med 46(11):1825–1834

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goethals I, D’Asseler Y, Dobbeleir A et al (2010) The effect of acquisition time on visual and semi-quantitative analysis of F-18 FDG-PET studies in patients with head and neck cancer. Nucl Med Commun 31(3):227–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lodge MA, Chaudhry MA, Wahl RL (2012) Noise considerations for PET quantification using maximum and peak standardized uptake value. J Nucl Med 53(7):1041–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brambilla M, Matheoud R, Secco C et al (2007) Impact of target-to-background ratio, target size, emission scan duration, and activity on physical figures of merit for a 3D LSO-based whole body PET/CT scanner. Med Phys 34(10):3854–3865

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luyi Zhou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fan, Q., Su, M., Zhou, L. (2014). Impact of Scan Duration on PET/CT Maximum Standardized Uptake Value Measurement. In: Li, S., Jin, Q., Jiang, X., Park, J. (eds) Frontier and Future Development of Information Technology in Medicine and Education. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 269. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7618-0_405

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7618-0_405

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7617-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7618-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics