Skip to main content

Contrast Analysis of Standardized Patients and Real Patients in Clinical Medical Teaching

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Frontier and Future Development of Information Technology in Medicine and Education

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 269))

  • 134 Accesses

Abstract

Objective To investigate the role and characteristics of Standardized Patients (SP) in clinical medical teaching. Methods The differences were analyzed between SP and real patients through the questionnaire survey. Results ① There were no significant differences on the teaching effect between these two methods (P > 0.05). ② The effect of SP is better than that of the real patients in compliance, cooperation (P < 0.05). ③ SP were not impacted by time and season. Conclusion SP have the same clinical teaching effect as real patients, while SP were better than real patients in compliance and cooperation, and SP were more suitable for clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rethans JJ, Grosfeld FJ, Aper L et al (2012) Six formats in simulated and standardized patients use, based on experiences of 13 undergraduate medical curricula in Belgium and the Netherlands. Med Teach 34(9):710–716

    Google Scholar 

  2. Petrusa ER (2004) Taking standardized patients based examinations to the next level. Teach Learn Med 16(1):98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mary W et al (writer), Wang Q (editor-translator) (2009) .A 10-year Review of literature on the use of standardized patients in teaching and learning. Fudan Educ Forum 7(6):92–94

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yuan Y, Chen X (2007) The peculiarity and countermeasure of medical students’ innovative diagnosis. Res Med Edu 6(7):629–630

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen ZX, Xiao J (2008) The importance of the clinic skill learning center in diagnostics teaching. Res Med Edu 7(2):155–174

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu XW, Duan XF, Xue WX, et al (2008) Practice and research of SP on cultivation of skills in Chinese medical science. J Yunnan Univ Tradit Chin Med 31(4):60–64

    Google Scholar 

  7. Swiggart WH, Ghulyan MV, Dewey CM (2012) Using standardized patients in continuing medical education courses on proper prescribing of controlled substances. Subst Abus 33(2):182–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhang Yali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yali, Z. et al. (2014). Contrast Analysis of Standardized Patients and Real Patients in Clinical Medical Teaching. In: Li, S., Jin, Q., Jiang, X., Park, J. (eds) Frontier and Future Development of Information Technology in Medicine and Education. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 269. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7618-0_171

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7618-0_171

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7617-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7618-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics