Skip to main content

The Singapore Mathematics Curriculum Development—A Mixed Model Approach

  • Chapter
Mathematics Curriculum in School Education

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

Singapore has a history of having a national mathematics curriculum, which is produced and disseminated by the Ministry of Education, exemplifying a deductive approach towards mathematical curriculum development (Olivia, Developing the curriculum, 2009). This Chapter presents, through three case studies of school-based curriculum innovations, how the development of mathematics curriculum in Singapore has evolved from a deductive to containing elements of both the deductive and inductive approaches—a mixed model approach. Through the eyes of the three case-studies, advantages to such a mixed model approach towards mathematics curriculum development will be presented. Key contributing factors for the success of such a mixed model approach will be elicited through an analysis of these case studies as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Cohen (1988, pp. 284–288), SMD=0.10 is a small effect size, SMD=0.25 is a medium effect size, and SMD=0.40 or larger is a large effect size.

References

  • Charles, R., Lester, F., & O’Daffer, P. (1987). How to evaluate progress in problem solving. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collars, C., Koay, P. L., Lee, N. H., & Tan, C. S. (2007). Shaping maths teacher’s resource CD-ROM 3. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engaging multiple intelligences in the math classroom (2011, November/December). SingTeach. Retrieved from http://www.nie.edu.sg/research-nie/research-publications/singteach?url=http://singteach.nie.edu.sg/.

  • Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: the theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S. E., Lee, N. H., & Yeo, J. S. D. (2012). A metacognitive approach in kick-starting the understanding and planning phases of mathematical problem solving. In ICME-12, the 12th international congress on mathematical education—pre-proceedings, TSG22-3. Seoul: ICME-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, B. (1995). An investigation of children’s knowledge and strategies in mathematical problem solving. Unpublished master’s thesis, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. H. (2008a). Nation building initiative: impact on Singapore mathematics curriculum. In M. Niss (Ed.), 10th international congress on mathematical education proceedings (CD). Copenhagen: Roskilde University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. H. (2008b). Enhancing mathematical learning and achievement of secondary one normal (academic) students using metacognitive strategies. Unpublished PhD thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. H. (2010). The role and nature of curriculum frameworks in mathematics curriculum development initiatives. In Y. Shimizu, Y. Sekiguchi, & K. Hino (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th East Asian regional conference on mathematics education (EARCOME5): in search of excellence in mathematics education (pp. 607–614). Tokyo: Japan Society of Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. H., & Abdul Rasip, A. (2010, August). Sustainability of school-based curriculum initiatives—lessons drawn from igniting passion in mathematics through multiple intelligences. Poster session presented at the 5th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. H., & Ferrucci, B. (2012). Enhancing learning of fraction through the use of virtual manipulatives. The Electronic Journal of Mathematics & Technology, 6(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. H., Abdul Rasip, R., Othman, S., & Sam, H. (2008, November). School-based curriculum initiative—the case of igniting passion in mathematics through multiple intelligences. Paper presented at APERA Conference 2008—Educational Research for Innovation & Quality in Education: Policy & Pedagogical Engagements Across Contexts, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunenburg, F. C. (2011a). Curriculum development: deductive model. Schooling, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunenburg, F. C. (2011b). Curriculum development: inductive model. Schooling, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunenburg, F. C. (2011c). Key components of a curriculum plan: objectives, content, and learning experiences. Schooling, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mindellhall, P., Swan, P., Northcote, P., & Marshall, L. (2008). Virtual manipulatives on the interactive whiteboard: a preliminary investigation. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 13(1), 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2006). Mathematics syllabus—primary, 2007. Singapore: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2008, January 8). More support for school’s “teach less, learn more” initiatives [Press Releases]. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/2008/01/more-support-for-schools-teach.php.

  • Ministry of Education (2012a). O-level mathematics teaching and learning syllabus. Singapore: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2012b). Primary mathematics teaching and learning syllabus. Singapore: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. F. (2009). The Singapore primary mathematics curriculum. In P. Y. Lee & N. H. Lee (Eds.), Teaching primary school mathematics—a resource book (2nd ed., pp. 15–34). Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivia, P. F. (2009). Developing the curriculum (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: theory and practice. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J., Lim, C. A. C., & Tan, K. C. (2011). Impact of use of manipulative materials in the concrete-pictorial-abstract approach on pupils’ engagement and conceptual understanding. Poster presented at 4th Redefining Pedagogy International Conference 2011, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Straits Times (1999). Preparing people for challenges—addenda to the president’s address. Singapore: Singapore Press Holdings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. Y. (2004, July). Using muti-modal think-board to teach mathematics. Paper presented for TSG14: Innovative Approaches to the Teaching of Mathematics at ICME-10, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ngan Hoe Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, N.H. (2014). The Singapore Mathematics Curriculum Development—A Mixed Model Approach. In: Li, Y., Lappan, G. (eds) Mathematics Curriculum in School Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics