Skip to main content

The Metaphorical Links Between Ecology, Ethics, and Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Linking Ecology and Ethics for a Changing World

Part of the book series: Ecology and Ethics ((ECET,volume 1))

Abstract

It is now widely understood that metaphors are not simply rhetorical embellishment in science, but serve a critical epistemic role for the creation and exploration of theories. Three prevalent ecological metaphors—competition, invasion, and resilience—serve as examples and touchstones of the role of metaphors in ecology, and how their origin and operation as “feedback metaphors” interweaves ecology with its social context. In each case, the social origin of these metaphors implies that they are value-laden at the level of interpretation (i.e., due to their resonance with everyday language) and/or at the level of worldview (i.e., due to the way they highlight some aspects of a comparison while hiding others). Thus, metaphoric choices in ecology should be subject to ethical scrutiny. In effect, this necessitates paying attention to the “evolutionary ecology” of metaphors in ecology itself—that is, attention to factors such as their context, diversity, history, and scale. These normative elements in metaphors bear directly on perennial discussions about objectivity and advocacy in ecology, and how ecologists should use metaphors in science while being cognizant of and sensitive to their social context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Epistemic means “of or pertaining to knowledge.” In this sentence, notice several instrumental metaphors (“instrument” and “function”) for metaphors.

  2. 2.

    Note that this choice of a metaphor is steeped in a cybernetic view of the world (see Larson 2011a).

References

  • Balmford A, Bond W (2005) Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being. Ecol Lett 8:1218–1234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bono JJ (1990) Science, discourse, and literature: the role/rule of metaphor in science. In: Peterfreund S (ed) Literature and science: theory and practice. Northeastern University Press, Boston, pp 59–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher DH (1986) The idea of mutualism, past and future. In: Boucher DH (ed) The biology of mutualism: ecology and beyond. Croom Helm, London, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw GA, Bekoff M (2001) Ecology and social responsibility: the re-embodiment of science. Trends Ecol Evol 16:460–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown TL (2003) Making truth: metaphor in science. University of Illinois Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddington K (2001) The ‘balance of nature’ metaphor and equilibrium in population ecology. Biol Philos 16:463–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Thompson K, Grime JP (2001) Charles S. Elton and the dissociation of invasion ecology from the rest of ecology. Divers Distrib 7:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Stern PC (1998) Science, values, and biodiversity. BioScience 48:441–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas HE (2009) Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott KC (2009) The ethical significance of language in the environmental sciences: case studies from pollution research. Ethics Place Environ 12:157–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming PA (ed) (2006) Can nature (legitimately) be our guide? In: Lodge DM, Hamlin C (eds) Religion and the new ecology: environmental responsibility in a world in flux. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp 199–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote L, Krogman N, Spence J (2009) Should academics advocate on environmental issues? Soc Nat Resour 22:579–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway DJ (1989) Primate visions: gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology, and other essays. Garland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbers JM (2007) Watch your language! Racially loaded metaphors in scientific research. BioScience 57:104–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T (2000) The perception of the environment: essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA (1989) Competition. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keller EF (1988) Demarcating public from private values in evolutionary discourse. J Hist Biol 21:195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller EF (1992) Competition: current usages. In: Keller EF, Lloyd EA (eds) Keywords in evolutionary biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 68–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller EF (1995) Refiguring life: metaphors of twentieth century biology. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid H, Dupré J, Wylie A (eds) (2007) Value-free science? Ideals and illusions. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P (2001) Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson BMH (2005) The war of the roses: demilitarizing invasion biology. Front Ecol Environ 3:495–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson BMH (2008) Entangled biological, cultural and linguistic origins of the war on invasive species. In: Frank R, Dirven R, Ziemke T, Bernárdez E (eds) Body, language and mind, vol 2, Sociocultural situatedness. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 169–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson BMH (2009) Should scientists advocate? The case of promotional metaphors in environmental science. In: Nerlich B, Elliot R, Larson BMH (eds) Communicating biological sciences: ethical and metaphorical dimensions. Ashgate, Burlington, pp 169–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson B (2011a) Metaphors for environmental sustainability: redefining our relationship with nature. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson BMH (2011b) Embodied realism and invasive species. In: de Laplante K, Peacock K (eds) Philosophy of ecology and conservation biology. Elsevier, London, pp 133–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM, Hamlin C (eds) (2006) Religion and the new ecology: environmental responsibility in a world in flux. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM, Williams S, MacIsaac HJ et al (2006) Biological invasions: recommendations for US policy and management. Ecol Appl 16:2035–2054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1998) Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 279:491–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maasen S, Mendelsohn E, Weingart P (eds) (1995) Biology as society, society as biology: metaphors. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh R (1992) Competition: historical perspectives. In: Keller EF, Lloyd EA (eds) Keywords in evolutionary biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MP, Vucetich JA (2009) On advocacy by environmental scientists: what, whether, why, and how. Conserv Biol 23:1090–1101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (1998) Improving ecological communication: the role of ecologists in environmental policy formation. Ecol Appl 8:350–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortony A (ed) (1993) Metaphor and thought, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Chornesky EA et al (2005) Ecological science and sustainability for the 21st century. Front Ecol Environ 3:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper S (1942) World hypotheses. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA Jr (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam H (2002) The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DP, Hull RB (2003) Public ecology: an environmental science and policy for global society. Environ Sci Policy 6:399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Policy 7:385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepan NL (1986) Race and gender: the role of analogy in science. Isis 77:261–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P (1998) Natural selection: a heavy hand in biological and social thought. Sci Cult 7:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber JR, Word CS (2001) The communication process as evaluative context: what do nonscientists hear when scientists speak? BioScience 51:487–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M (1997) What does ‘ecology’ mean? Trends Ecol Environ 12:166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS, Deitrich E, Clark AB (2003) On the inappropriate use of the naturalistic fallacy in evolutionary psychology. Biol Philos 18:669–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worster D (1985) Nature’s economy: a history of ecological ideas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Worster D (1990) The ecology of order and chaos. Environ Hist Rev 14:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinken J, Hellsten I, Nerlich B (eds) (2008) Discourse metaphors. In: Frank R, Dirven R, Ziemke T, Bernárdez E (eds) Body, language and mind, vol 2, Sociocultural situatedness. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 363–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuk M (1993) Feminism and the study of animal behavior. BioScience 43:774–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendon M. H. Larson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Larson, B.M.H. (2013). The Metaphorical Links Between Ecology, Ethics, and Society. In: Rozzi, R., Pickett, S., Palmer, C., Armesto, J., Callicott, J. (eds) Linking Ecology and Ethics for a Changing World. Ecology and Ethics, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7470-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics