Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developing Probabilistic Thinking: What About People’s Conceptions?

  • Chapter
Probabilistic Thinking

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

Since the important work on reasoning under uncertainty by Kahneman and Tversky in the 1970s, the description of how people think about probability by using intuitions, conceptions and misconceptions have been studied in psychology and mathematics education. Over the years, the body of the literature have identified and studied many of them. Some conceptions, such as representativeness and availability, are well known. But not all of the conceptions have been studied many times and the conceptions presented in the literature usually don’t relate them to each other. Therefore, it is now difficult to have a broader perspective on people conceptions of probability. In addition to that, some epistemological differences exist between the conceptions. Not all of them use the same kind of reasoning for addressing different aspects of probability. Thus, a broader perspective of people conceptions of probability involves not only knowing about conceptions and links them together; it also includes knowing about the mathematical aspect involved.

This chapter will define what a conception is and present a classification of some of them given in the literature, based on their epistemological differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For instance, see the work of Gilovich and Griffin (2002) and Kahneman (2011).

References

  • Amir, G. S., & Williams, J. S. (1999). Cultural influences on children’s probabilistic thinking. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(1), 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batanero, C., Green, D. R., & Serrano, L. R. (1998). Randomness, its meaning and educational implications. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 29(1), 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batanero, C., & Serrano, L. (1999). The meaning of randomness for secondary school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 558–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger, M. (2008). Du changement conceptuel à la complexification conceptuelle dans l’apprentissage des sciences. Montréal: Université de Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovcnik, M., & Peard, R. (1996). Probability. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematical education (Vol. 2, pp. 239–287). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briand, J. (2005). Une expérience statistique et une première approche des lois du hasard au lycée par une confrontation avec une machine simple. Recherches en Didactique des sMathématiques, 25(2), 247–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1998). Théories des situations didactiques. Grenoble: La pensée sauvage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (2005). Situations fondamentales et processus génétiques de la statistique. In A. Mercier & C. Margolinas (Eds.), Balises pour la Didactique des Mathématiques (pp. 165–194). Grenoble: La pensée sauvage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, D. (2006). Elementary pre-service teachers’ conceptions of variation in a probability context. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(1), 36–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caravita, S., & Halldén, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff, E. J. (2009). Sample space partitions: an investigative lens. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff, E. J., & Zazkis, R. (2011). From personal to conventional probabilities: from sample set to sample space. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 15–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2008). Primary school children’s and college students’ recency effects in a gaming situation. Paper presented at the international congress on mathematics education (ICME 11), Monterrey, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vecchi, G. (1992). Aider les élèves à apprendre. Paris: Hachette Éducation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Désautels, J., & Larochelle, M. (1990). A constructivist pedagogical strategy: the epistemological disturbance (experiment and preliminary results). In D. E. Herget (Ed.), More history and philosophy of science in science teaching (pp. 236–257). Tallahassee: Florida State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessart, D. J. (1995). Randomness: a connection to reality. In P. A. House & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Connecting mathematics across the curriculum. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1995 Yearbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dress, F. (2004). Probabilités et statistiques de A à Z. Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (2005). Combinatorics and the development of children’s combinatorial reasoning. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Mathematics education library. Exploring probability in school: challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 121–141). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. (1983). Revision of probabilities and the time axis. In D. Tall (Ed.), Proceedings of the third international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 64–66). Warwick: University of Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. (1975). The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E., Sainati Nello, M., & Sciolis Marino, M. (1991). Factors affecting probabilistics judgements in children and adolescents. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 523–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: implications for research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2005). A framework for teaching and assessing reasoning about variability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 92–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2006). Bounded and rational. In R. J. Stainton (Ed.), Contemporary debates in cognitive science (pp. 115–133). Oxford: Blackwall Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., & Griffin, D. (2002). Introduction—heuristics and biaises: then and now. In D. G. D. K. T. Gilovich (Ed.), Heuristics and biaises (p. 855). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordan, A. (1998). Apprendre! Paris: Belin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordan, A., & Pellaud, F. (2004). La place des conceptions dans la médiation de la chimie. L’actualité Chimique, 280–281, 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gras, R., & Totohasina, A. (1995). Conceptions d’élèves sur la notion de probabilité conditionnelle révélées par une méthode d’analyse des données: implication—similarité—corrélation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28, 337–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. (1983). From thumbtacks to inference. School Science and Mathematics, 83(7), 541–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. (1989). School’s pupil’s understanding of randomness. In R. Morris (Ed.), Studies mathematics education (Vol. 7, pp. 27–39). Paris: Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. (1990). A longitudinal study of pupil’s probability concepts. In D. Vere-Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of the third international conference on teaching statistics (Vol. 1). Dunedin: ISI Publications on Teaching Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. (1993). Ramdomness—a key concept. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 24(6), 897–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürbüz, R., & Birgin, O. (2011). The effects od computer-assisted teaching on remedying misconceptiosn: the case of the subject “probability”. Computers & Education, 58, 931–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haylock, D. (2001). Mathematics explained for primary teachers. London: Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C. A., & Mogill, T. A. (1997). A framework for assessing and nurturing young children’s thinking in probability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaheman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: a judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 439–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farra, Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissane, B., & Kemp, M. (2010). Teachning and learning probability in the age of technology. Paper presented at the 15th Asian technology conference on mathematics, Kuala Lumpyr, Malaysia, 17–21 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C. (1989). Informal conceptions of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 59–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C. (1991). Understanding student’s beliefs about probability. In E. V. Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 139–156). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C. (1995). Issues in assessing conceptual understanding in probability and statistics. Journal for Statistics Education, 3(1). http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v3n1/konold.html.

  • Konold, C., Pollatsek, A., Well, A., Lohmeier, J., & Lipson, A. (1993). Inconsistencies in students’ reasoning about probability. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(5), 392–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmak, S. D., & Gelman, R. (1986). Young children’s understanding of random phenomena. Child Development, 57, 559–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J., & Roth, J. (1975). Heads I win, tails it’s chance: the illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 951–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larochelle, M., & Désautels, J. (1992). Autour de l’idée de science: itinéraires cognitifs d’étudiants et d’étudiantes. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université Laval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecoutre, M.-P. (1992). Cognitive models and problems spaces in “purely random” situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 557–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecoutre, M.-P., & Durand, J.-L. (1988). Jugements probabilistes et modèles cognitifs: étude d’une situation aléatoire. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19, 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecoutre, M.-P., Durand, J.-L., & Cordier, J. (1990). A study of two biases in probabilistic judgements: representativeness and equiprobability. In J.-P. Caverni, J.-M. Fabre, & M. Gonzales (Eds.), Cognitive biases (pp. 563–575). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecoutre, M.-P., & Fischbein, E. (1998). Évolution avec l’âge de « misconceptions » dans les intuitions probabilistes en France et en Israël. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 18(3), 311–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Thompson, P. (2007). Teachers’ understanding of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2–3), 113–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maury, S. (1985). Influence de la question dans une épreuve relative à la notion d’indépendance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. S. (1990). Uncertainty. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants: new approaches to numeracy (pp. 95–137). Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munisamy, S., & Doraisamy, L. (1998). Levels of understanding of probability concept among secondary school pupils. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 29(1), 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1967). Biologie et connaissance. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1974). La prise de conscience. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1975). L’équilibration des structures cognitives. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1974). La genèse de l’idée de hasard chez l’enfant (deuxième édition). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt Nicolson, C. (2005). Is chance fair? One student’s thoughts on probability. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(2), 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouan, O. (1991). Hasard et probabilité: conceptions d’élèves de 16 à 18 ans (p. 40). Montréal: Université du Québec à Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saenz Castro, C. (1998). Teaching probability for conceptual change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San Martin, E. (2007). Piaget’s viewpoint o the teaching of probability: a breaking-off with the traditional notion of chance? Paper presented at the international conference on teaching statistics, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savard, A. (2008a). From “real life” to mathematics: a way for improving mathematical learning. Paper presented at the International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME 11), Monterrey, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savard, A. (2008b). Le développement d’une pensée critique envers les jeux de hasard et d’argent par l’enseignement des probabilités à l’école primaire: vers une prise de décision. Thèse inédite. Québec: Université Laval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savard, A. (2010). Simulating the risk without gambling: can student conceptions generate critical thinking about probability? Paper presented at the international conference on teaching statistic (ICOTS 8), Ljubljana, Slovenia, July 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savard, A. (2011). Teaching citizenship education through the mathematics course. In B. Sriraman & V. Freiman (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity for the 21st century: proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on mathematics and its connections to arts and sciences (MACAS) (pp. 127–137). Charlotte: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, R. W. (1991). Psychological research in probabilistic understanding. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encount probability in education (pp. 213–256). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: reflections and directions. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–495). New York: Macmillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbring, H. (1991). The concept of chance in everyday teaching: aspects of a social epistemology of mathematical knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 503–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohl, H. (2005). Probability in teacher education and development. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: challenges for teaching and learning (Vol. 40, pp. 345–366). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2000). Multiple frameworks? Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 22(4), 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, J. E., & Jones, G. A. (1997). A framework for assessing middle school students’ thinking in conditional probability and independence. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9, 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, M., Lajoie, C., & Savard, A. (2012). Un processus parsemé de choix déterminants: les dessous d’un cadre conceptuel au centre d’un projet de maîtrise portant sur des conceptions d’élèves autour du hasard et des probabilités. Paper presented at the Colloque sur la formation à la recherche en didactique des mathématiques, Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truran, K. (1995). Animism: a view of probability behaviour. Paper presented at the eighteeth annual conference of the mathematics education reserach group of Australasia, Darwin, NT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kaheman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of the small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kaheman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahey, P. (2000). Learning probability through the use of a collaborative, inquiry-based simulation environment. Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), 51–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., & Verschaffel, L. (2004). Extending the conceptual change approach to mathematics learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 445–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (2005). The probabilistic reasoning of middle school students. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 145–169). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., Collins, K. F., & Moritz, J. B. (1997). The development of chance measurement. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9, 60–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2004). Expectation versus variation: student’s decision making in a chance environment. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(3), 371–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2003). Fairness of dice: a longitudinal study of students’ beliefs and strategies for making judgements. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(4), 270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil-Barais, A., & Vergnaud, G. (1990). Students’ conceptions in physics and mathematics: biases and helps. In J.-M. F. M. G. J.-P. Caverni (Ed.), Cognitive biases (pp. 69–84). North-Holland: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T. (1994). Commentary: conceptual and conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata Cardona, L. (2008). How do teachers deal with the heuristic of representativeness? Paper presented at the international congress on mathematics education (ICME 11), Monterrey, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. McGill University, 3700, McTavish, Montreal, Québec, Canada, H3A 1Y2

    Annie Savard

Authors
  1. Annie Savard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annie Savard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Saskatchewan College of Education, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

    Egan J. Chernoff

  2. Dept of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Montana, Montana, Montana, USA

    Bharath Sriraman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Savard, A. (2014). Developing Probabilistic Thinking: What About People’s Conceptions?. In: Chernoff, E., Sriraman, B. (eds) Probabilistic Thinking. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation