Skip to main content

Multi-Flow Traffic Investigation of AODV Considering Routing Control Packets

  • Conference paper
Information Technology Convergence

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 253))

  • 1097 Accesses

Abstract

Recently, wireless communication systems are oriented to mobile communications, because of the increasing number of smart phones and tablets in today’s market. The interest on Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) is also increasing due to their potential use in several fields such as collaborative computing and multimedia communications. Thus, there is an increasing need to minimize the overhead introduced by routing protocols in the network. In this paper, we analyze the performance of a MANET by simulations, investigating the effects of RREQ, RREP and RERR, considering Random Waypoint Mobility (RWM) model. We consider the case when source and destination nodes are static. We evaluate the performance by measuring the throughput and AODV control packets, for single-flow and multiple-flow communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. De Marco G, Ikeda M, Yang T, Barolli L (2007) Experimental performance evaluation of pro-active adhoc routing protocol in outdoor and indoor scenarios. In: Proceedings of AINA-2007, pp 7–14, May 2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barolli L, Ikeda M, De Marco G, Durresi A, Xhafa F (2009) Performance analysis of OLSR and BATMAN protocols considering link quality parameter. In: Proceedings of AINA-2009, pp 307–314, May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ikeda M, Barolli L, Hiyama M, Yang T, De Marco G, Durresi A (2009) Performance evaluation of a MANET testbed for different topologies. In: Proceedings of NBiS-2009, Indianapolis, pp 327–334, Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kulla E, Ikeda M, Barolli L, Miho R (2010) Impact of source and destination movement on MANET performance considering BATMAN and AODV protocols. In: Proceedings of BWCCA-2010), pp 94–101

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kulla E, Ikeda M, Barolli L, Younas M, Uchida K, Takizawa M (2012) Simulation performance of a MANET using static source and destination considering AODV routing protocol. In: Proceedings of NBiS-2012, pp 141–147

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kulla E, Hiyama M, Ikeda M, Barolli L, Uchida K, Takizawa M (2012) Setting up static components for investigating MANET performance: a simulation case. In: Proceedings of BWCCA-2012), pp 53–59, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  7. Perkins C, Belding-Royer E, Das S (2003) Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing, RFC3561. Nokia Research Center, University of California, University of Cincinnati. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt. Accessed May 2012

  8. Nordström E (2002) APE—a large scale ad-hoc network testbed for reproducible performance tests, Master’s thesis, Uppsala University

    Google Scholar 

  9. Owada Y, Takahashi Y, Suda T, Terui H, Taki F, Yagi T, Mase K (2005) A large scale wireless mobile adhoc network testbed. In: Proceedings of IEEE vehicular technology conference, pp 324–328, Sept 2005

    Google Scholar 

  10. Draves R, Padhye J, Zill B (2004) Comparison of routing metrics for static multi-hop wireless networks. In: Proceedings of SIGCOMM-2004, pp 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bicket J, Aguayo D, Biswas S, Morris R (2005) Architecture and evaluation of an unplanned 802.11b mesh network. In: Proceedings of MOBICOM-2005, pp 31–42

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maltz DA, Broch J, Johnson DB (2001) Lessons from a full-scale multihop wireless ad-hoc network testbed. J Pers Commun 8(1):8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson DB, Maltz DA, Broch J (2001) DSR: the dynamic source routing protocol for multi-hop wireless ad-hoc networks. J Ad-Hoc Netw 5:139–172

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gray RS, Kotz D, Newport C, Dubrovsky N, Fiske A, Liu J, Masone C, McGrath S, Yuan Y (2004) Outdoor experimental comparison of four ad-hoc routing algorithms. In: Proceedings of MSWiM-2004, pp 220–229

    Google Scholar 

  15. Borgia E, Conti M, Gregori E (2005) IEEE 802.11b ad-hoc networks: performance measurements. J Cluster Comput 8(2–3):135–145

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clausen T, Hansen G, Christensen L, Behrmann G (2001) The optimized link state routing protocol, evaluation through experiments and simulation. In: Proceedings of IEEE symposium on wireless personal mobile communications. http://hipercom.inria.fr/olsr/wpmc01.ps, Sept 2001

  17. Johnson D, Hancke G (2009) Comparison of two routing metrics in OLSR on a grid based mesh network. J Ad-Hoc Netw 7(2):374–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanashi AM, Siddique A, Awan I, Woodward M (2007) Performance evaluation of dynamic probablilistic flooding under different mobility models in MANETs. In: Proceedings of ICPADS-2007, Vol 2, pp 1–6, Dec 2007

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hanashi AM, Awan I, Woodward M (2009) Performance evaluation with different mobility models for dynamic probabilistic flooding in MANETs. J Mobile Inf Sys 5(1):65–80

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cavilla AL, Baron G, Hart TE, Litty L, de Lara E (2004) Simplified simulation models for indoor MANET evaluation are not robust. Proceedings of annual IEEE communications society SECON-2004 conference, pp 610–620, Oct 2004

    Google Scholar 

  21. Munjal A,Camp T, Navidi WC (2010) Constructing rigorous MANET simulation scenarios with realistic mobility. Proceedings of European wireless (EW-2010) conference, pp 817–824, Apr 2010

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shannon RE (1998) Introduction to the art and science of simulation. In: Proceedings of WSC-98

    Google Scholar 

  23. NETSIM—the cisco network simulator & router simulator. http://www.boson.com/netsimcisco-network-simulator. Accessed Mar 2012

  24. OPNET—optimized network engineering tools. http://www.opnet.com/. Accessed Mar 2012

  25. NS2—network simulator version 2. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/. Accessed Mar 2012

  26. NS3—network simulator version 3. http://www.nsnam.org/, Accessed Mar 2012

  27. Broch J, Maltz DA, Johnson DB, Hu Y-C, Jetcheva J (1998) A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In: Proceedings of the fourth annual ACM/IEEE Mobicom-98, ACM, Oct 1998

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). The authors would like to thank JSPS or the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elis Kulla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kulla, E., Hiyama, M., Ikeda, M., Barolli, L., Xhafa, F., Takizawa, M. (2013). Multi-Flow Traffic Investigation of AODV Considering Routing Control Packets. In: Park, J.J., Barolli, L., Xhafa, F., Jeong, H.Y. (eds) Information Technology Convergence. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 253. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6996-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6996-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6995-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6996-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics