Skip to main content

Can the Grouping of Children in Classrooms Affect Their Learning; An Introduction to Social Pedagogy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Effective Group Work in Primary School Classrooms

Abstract

The aim of Chap. 1 is to introduce the concept ‘social pedagogy of learning’ and describe how it was developed over a number of years by Blatchford and Kutnick. Social pedagogy of learning recognizes that most acts of learning take place in a social context (between the learner and others), and learning that takes place in school-based classrooms presents a number of unusual circumstances which impinge upon the effectiveness of that learning. To understand why and how classrooms may affect learning, the chapter reviews a range of historical and theoretical circumstances; noting that classrooms are a relatively recent concept in the history of learning and that the process of learning is inherently ‘social’ (that is, it involves the learners interacting with others). Through the use of ‘classroom mapping’ we show the complex social and learning characteristics of classrooms that underlie our view of social pedagogy. Mapping shows that children undertake a range of learning tasks and interact with their teacher in a variety of ways—but mapping also notes that children spend most of their time with peers and in some form of classroom group. Interacting in close proximity with others has featured in a number of developmental psychological theories of learning as well as sociological and social psychological theories, and we note that children’s cognitive development will be affected by the particular children and groups within which they interact. We argue that current explanations of socio-cognitive, co-operative and collaborative learning may not provide fully adequate models for learning in authentic classrooms. Here, and in Chap. 2, we identify that learning may be promoted or hindered within the social context of classrooms. Further, previous studies have tended to neglect the quality of relationships that children develop with their peers as fundamental to the enhancement of classroom learning. To more fully expand our concept of social pedagogy, this initial chapter considers relationships, types of groups, learning tasks and teachers all contribute to a social pedagogy of (classroom) learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It can also be argued from a sociological perspective that these early 20th century classrooms were organized for the social reproduction of the dominant economic system as argued by Bowles and Gintes (1976) and others as seen in the social class composition of the school and the community where the school is placed.

References

  • Ainsworth, M., Bell, S. & Stayton, D. (1974). Infant-mother attachment and social development: ‘socialisation’ as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. In M. Richards (Ed.), Integration of a child into a social world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison Welsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C., Chang, J., Waggoner, M., & Yi, H. (1997). On the logical integrity of children’s arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 15(2), 135–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M., & Trevitt, J. (1991). Attachment behaviour and the school child. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N., Desforges, C., Cockburn, A., & Wilkinson, B. (1984). The quality of pupil learning experiences. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatchford, P. (1979). The development of social interaction between infants. PhD thesis, University of Surrey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatchford. P., & Baines, E. (2010). Peer relations in school. In K. Littleton, C. Wood & K. Staarman (Eds.) Elsevier handbook of educational psychology: New perspectives on learning and teaching. Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (2000). Exploring situated insights into research and learning. Journal for Research into Mathematics Education, 31(1), 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, S., Barnett, B., & Filby, N. (1985). Grouping and instructional organization. In P. Peterson, L. Wilkinson & M. Hallinan (Eds.), The social context of instruction. Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1983). Children’s talk: Learning to use language. New York: WW Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F., & Hartup,W. W. (1996). The company they keep: friendship in childhood and adolescence. New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark-Stewart, A., & Dunn, J. (2006). Families count: effects on child and adolescent development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., & Lotan, R. (1995). Producing equal status interaction in the heteregeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C. (1998). Children as computer users: The case of collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 30(3–4), 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. (1977). The social world of the child. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2007). Democracy and education. Fairfield: The Echo Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reisman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, D., Mugny, G., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1975). Social interaction and the development of cognitive operations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(3), 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreeben, R. (1984). First-grade reading groups: Their formation and change. In P. Peterson, L. Wilkinson & M. Hallinan (Eds.), The social context of instruction. Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1993). Young children’s close relationships: Beyond attachment. Newbury: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (2004). Children’s friendships: The beginning of intimacy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (1994). The curricular applications of classroom groups. In P. Kutnick & C. Rogers (Eds.), Groups in schools. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., Phillips, C., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students’ helping behaviour during peer mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 223–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M. J., Hargreaves, L., Comber, C., Wall, D., & Pell, A. (1999). Inside the primary classroom: 20 years on. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford-Smith, M., & Brownell, C. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 235–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R., & Kahn, A. (2009). Promoting reasoned argumentation, problem-solving and learning during small-group work. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005). Dialogue: a theoretical framework for distance education instructional systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (2007). Children’s cognitive development and learning. Research report 2/1a the primary review. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, G. (2006). Urban education: confronting the contradictions: The London case. London Review of Education, 4(2), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadow. (1926). Education of the adolescent. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadow. (1931). Report of the consultative committee on the primary school. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadow. (1933). Report of the consultative committee on infant and nursery schools. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. (1994). The social relational approach. In P. Kutnick & C. Rogers (Eds.), Groups in schools. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialisation theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, N., & Chantry, K. (2002). Reorganising primary classroom learning. Buckingham: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C. (2010). Peer groups and children’s development: Psychological and educational perspectives. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C., & Mercer, N. (2007). Children’s social development, peer interaction and classroom learning. Research report 2/1b the primary review. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C., & Tolmie, A. (2003). Group work in primary school science: Discussion, consensus and guidance from experts. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C. (1983). Patterns of friendship. Child Development, 54, 1041–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1957). Principles of psychology. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. (2003a). Joining together: Group theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2003b). Student motivation in co-operative groups: Social interdependence theory. In R. Gillies & A. Ashman (Eds.), Co-operative learning: Social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups. London: Routledge/Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessen, W. (1991). The American child and other cultural inventions. In M. Woodhead, P. Light & R. Carr (Eds.), Growing up in a changing society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P. (1988). Relationships in the primary school classroom. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P. (1994). Use and effectiveness of groups in schools. In P. Kutnick & C. Rogers (Eds.), Groups in schools. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., & Brees, P. (1982). The development of cooperation: Explorations in cognitive and moral competence and social authority. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 361–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., & Manson, I. (1998). Social life in the classroom: Towards a relational concept of social skills for use in the classroom. In A. Campbell & S. Muncer (Eds.), The social child. Hove: The Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., & Thomas, M. (1990). Dyadic pairings for the enhancement of cognitive development in the school curriculum; some preliminary results on science tasks. British Educational Research Journal, 16, 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., & Kington, A. (2005). Children’s friendships and learning in school; cognitive enhancement through social interaction? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., Blatchford, P., & Baines, E. (2002). Pupil groupings in primary school classrooms: Sites for learning and social pedagogy? British Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., Blatchford, P., & Baines, E. (2005). Grouping of pupils in secondary school classrooms: Possible links between pedagogy and learning. Social Psychology of Education, 8(4), 349–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W. (2005). Children’s peer relations and social competence: A century of progress. New Haven: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, P., & Littleton, K. (1994). Cognitive approaches to groupwork. In P. Kutnick & C. Rogers (Eds.), Groups in schools. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Chiu, M., & Law, N. W. Y. (2011). Effects of collaborative argumentation processes on justifications: A statistical analysis of online discussion. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 946–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. R., Meill, D., & Mitchell, L. (2002). An investigation of children’s musical collaborations: The effect of friendship and age. Psychology of Music, 30, 148–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathes, P. G., & Babyak, A. E. (2001). The effects of assisted literacy strategies for first-graders with and without additional mini-skill lessons. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16(1), 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meill, D., & MacDonald, R. (2000). Children’s creative collaborations: The importance of friendship when working together on a music composition. Social Development, 9(3), 348–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and development in children’s thinking—A socio-cultural approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1978). Notes towards a theory of complex learning. In A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pelligrino, S. D. Fokkema & R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and education. Norwell: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panitz, T. (1997). Collaborative and cooperative learning: Comparing the two concepts helps to understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. Cooperative Learning and College Teaching, 8(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, J., & Jones, J. (1976). Handbook of structured experience for human relations. La Jolla, Calif: University Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1928). Language and thought of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral development of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (2007). The republic (3rd Ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowden Report. (1967). Children and their primary school. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, A. (1985). The social world of the primary school. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, A., & Filer, A. (1995). The social world of children’s learning. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L.-J., Clark, A.-M., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J. (2007). Emile. Fairfield: The Echo Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3, social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R. J., Chen, X., Buskirk, A., & Wojslawowicz, J. (2005). Peer relationships in childhood. In M. Bornstein & M. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental science: An advanced textbook (5th ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International journal of educational research, 13(1), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman, R. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1988). About behaviorism. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and research. Handbook of Psychology, 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychology. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, J., Stoate, P., & Feest, G. (1992). Using group work in the primary classroom. Crediton. Exeter: Southgate Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1999). The elements of psychology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandell, D. L., & Mueller, E. (1980). Peer play and friendship during the first two years. In H. Foot, T. Chapman, & J. Smith (Eds.), Friendship and childhood relations. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M., & Farivar, S. (1994). Promoting helping behaviour in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 369–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping behaviour in peer directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M., & Palscinar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model and cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9, 493–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G., & Claxton, G. (2002). Learning for life in the 21st century. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1998). How children think and learn: The social contexts of cognitive development (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17(2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J. (1978). Dialectic theory and Piaget on social knowledge. Human Development, 21(4), 234–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J. (1980). Parents and peers in social development. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, R., & Hartup, W. W. (1997). Friends as coworkers: Research review and classroom implications. Elementary School Journal, 98, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Kutnick .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kutnick, P., Blatchford, P. (2014). Can the Grouping of Children in Classrooms Affect Their Learning; An Introduction to Social Pedagogy. In: Effective Group Work in Primary School Classrooms. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6991-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics