Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind ((SHPM,volume 12))

Abstract

Early medieval Latin discussions of perception were largely influenced by Avicenna’s Liber de anima. His description of the five external senses combined Aristotelian and Galenic medical ideas. Some medical views were also known through the Pantegni of ‘Alī ibn al-‘Abbās al-Mağūsī and the works of Costa ben Luca, Nemesius of Emesa and John Damascene. While Avicenna’s approach also included the Neoplatonic conception of the soul as the active perceiver which uses corporeal instruments, this was not a central theme in his De anima and was rather known through Augustine’s works. Aristotle’s theory became dominant when his De anima was included in the university curriculum in the middle of the thirteenth century. Following Averroes, Latin Aristotle commentators were particularly interested in the nature of the medium change and the reception of the sensory species of the object without matter.

Aristotelian perceptual realism involved the teleological idea that the passive sensory powers and their extra-mental objects constituted a relational whole in which the objective perceptibility of things was actualized when the sensory qualities activated the corresponding sensory powers. This model was somewhat qualified though not refuted by the early fourteenth-century interest in the subjective reception of sensory content and the tendency to combine Aristotle’s view of passive perception with various active elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartholomaeus Arnoldi of Usingen. (1499). Parvulus philosophiae naturalis. Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trutfetter, Jodocus. (1514). Summa in totam physicen. Erfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewan, L. (1980). St. Albert, the sensibles, and spiritual being. In J. A. Weisheipl (Ed.), Albertus Magnus and the sciences. Commemorative essays 1980 (pp. 291–320). Toronto: Pontificial Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grellard, C. (2005). Croire et savoir. Les principes de la connaissance selon Nicolas d’Autrécourt. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grellard, C. (2009). Nicolaus Autrecourt’s atomist physics. In C. Grellard & A. Robert (Eds.), Atomism in late medieval philosophy and theology (Medieval and early modern science 9, pp. 107–126). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, D. N. (2000). Avicenna’s De anima in the latin west. The formation of a peripatetic philosophy of the soul 1160–1300. London/Turin: The Warburg Institute/Aragno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivry, A. L. (2008a). The ontological entailments of Averroes’ understanding of perception, in Knuuttila & Kärkkäinen (Eds.), 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaukua, J., & Kukkonen, T. (2007). Sense-perception and self-awareness: Before and after Avicenna, in Heinämaa, Lähteenmäki, & Remes (Eds.), 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, S. (2008). Aristotle’s theory of perception and medieval Aristotelianism, in Knuuttila & Kärkkäinen (Eds.), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, D. C. (1996). Roger Bacon and the origins of perspectiva in the middle ages. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R. (1997). Theories of cognition in the later middle ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattin, A. (1988). Pour l’histoire du sens agent: la controverse entre Barthélemy de Bruges et Jean de Jandun, ses antécédents et son évolution: étude et textes inédits. Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perler, D. (2002). Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, F. (1952). see Avicenna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J. F. (2012). Robert Kilwardby on the human soul: Plurality of forms and censorship in the thirteenth century (Investigating medieval philosophy 3). Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siraisi, N. G. (1987). Avicenna in Renaissance Italy. The Canon and medical teaching in Italian universities after 1500. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steneck, N. H. (1980). Albert on the psychology of sense perception. In J. A. Weisheipl (Ed.), Albertus Magnus and the sciences. Commemorative essays 1980 (pp. 263–290). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachau, K. H. (1988). Vision and certitude in the age of Ockham. Optics, epistemology and the foundations of semantics 1250–1345. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellkamp, J. A. (1999). Sinne, Gegenstände und Sensibilia: zur Wahrnehmungslehre des Thomas von Aquin (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 66). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yrjönsuuri, M. (2008a). Perceiving one’s own body, in Knuuttila & Kärkkäinen (Eds.), 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simo Knuuttila .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knuuttila, S., Kärkkäinen, P. (2014). Medieval Theories. In: Knuuttila, S., Sihvola, J. (eds) Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6967-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics