Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind ((SHPM,volume 12))

  • 2505 Accesses

Abstract

The ancient Greek and Roman philosophers developed the ingredients of most of the conceptions about the soul which have later become influential in the history of philosophy. Plato’s contributions to psychology include highly influential arguments for dualism, whereas Aristotle emphasises the functionalist idea of the soul as the form of a living body. However, both philosophers are far from unambiguous in their theories of the soul, and their importance is by no means reducible to these basic ideas.

Among the Hellenistic philosophers, there existed a remarkable consensus about some features in the nature of the soul, even though their other philosophical views were quite divergent. The Epicureans, the Stoics, and many Hellenistic physicians endorsed dualist theories of the soul in the sense that the soul and the body are distinct from each other as substances. Despite this distinction, many Hellenistic philosophers also held that the souls are material or corporeal. They share the belief that something can be said to exist only if it is spatially extended, three-dimensional, and capable of acting or being acted upon. Therefore, the idea of a purely immaterial soul is rejected. Souls have matter which is, however, different from the matter of inanimate, or ‘non-souled’, bodies.

The later part of the ancient philosophical tradition saw a renewed interest in Plato and Aristotle. The first major commentator of Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias (third century), developed the Aristotelian position in great detail. The most important development was the interpretation he gave to De anima III.5, and the introduction of the so-called agent intellect. An influential discussion of this doctrine is in a small treatise on the intellect which was translated into Latin and known in the Arabic philosophical tradition. The Platonic doctrines became more and more influential towards the end of the ancient tradition. Plotinus (204/5–270) and the Neo-Platonists foremost incorporated the view which Plato explicated in the Phaedo. Plotinus in turn had a significant influence on the first major Christian philosopher, Augustine (354–430). In De trinitate, Augustine develops arguments for the incorporeality of the soul, which in turn had an enormous influence on philosophy of mind in a Platonic tradition throughout the Middle Ages and into early modern times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annas, J. (1992a). Hellenistic philosophy of mind. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostock, D. (1986). Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerlund, H. (2008). The unity of the soul and contrary appetites in medieval philosophy, in Lennon & Stainton (Eds.), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, H. (2008). Plato on the soul, in Fine (Ed.), 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. B. (2003). Augustine on the mind’s search for itself. Faith and Philosophy, 20, 415–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T. M. (2000). The defining features of the mind-body dualism in the writings of Plato, in Wright & Potter (Eds.), 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, R. W. (2008). Alexander Aphrodisiensis De anima libri mantissa. A new edition of the Greek text with introduction and commentary. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, C. (2011). Aristotle’s psychology. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophyhttp://plato.stanford.edu

  • Sorabji, R. (2005). The philosophy of the commentators. Volume 1: Psychology (with ethics and religion). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tieleman, T. L. (1996). Galen and Chrysippus on the soul: Argument and refutation in the De placitis books II and III (Philosophia Antiqua 58). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Staden, H. (2000). Hellenistic theories of body and soul, in Wright & Potter (Eds.), 79–116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik Lagerlund .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lagerlund, H., Sihvola, J. (2014). Ancient Theories. In: Knuuttila, S., Sihvola, J. (eds) Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6967-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics