Abstract
The ancient Greek and Roman philosophers developed the ingredients of most of the conceptions about the soul which have later become influential in the history of philosophy. Plato’s contributions to psychology include highly influential arguments for dualism, whereas Aristotle emphasises the functionalist idea of the soul as the form of a living body. However, both philosophers are far from unambiguous in their theories of the soul, and their importance is by no means reducible to these basic ideas.
Among the Hellenistic philosophers, there existed a remarkable consensus about some features in the nature of the soul, even though their other philosophical views were quite divergent. The Epicureans, the Stoics, and many Hellenistic physicians endorsed dualist theories of the soul in the sense that the soul and the body are distinct from each other as substances. Despite this distinction, many Hellenistic philosophers also held that the souls are material or corporeal. They share the belief that something can be said to exist only if it is spatially extended, three-dimensional, and capable of acting or being acted upon. Therefore, the idea of a purely immaterial soul is rejected. Souls have matter which is, however, different from the matter of inanimate, or ‘non-souled’, bodies.
The later part of the ancient philosophical tradition saw a renewed interest in Plato and Aristotle. The first major commentator of Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias (third century), developed the Aristotelian position in great detail. The most important development was the interpretation he gave to De anima III.5, and the introduction of the so-called agent intellect. An influential discussion of this doctrine is in a small treatise on the intellect which was translated into Latin and known in the Arabic philosophical tradition. The Platonic doctrines became more and more influential towards the end of the ancient tradition. Plotinus (204/5–270) and the Neo-Platonists foremost incorporated the view which Plato explicated in the Phaedo. Plotinus in turn had a significant influence on the first major Christian philosopher, Augustine (354–430). In De trinitate, Augustine develops arguments for the incorporeality of the soul, which in turn had an enormous influence on philosophy of mind in a Platonic tradition throughout the Middle Ages and into early modern times.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annas, J. (1992a). Hellenistic philosophy of mind. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bostock, D. (1986). Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lagerlund, H. (2008). The unity of the soul and contrary appetites in medieval philosophy, in Lennon & Stainton (Eds.), 75–91.
Lorenz, H. (2008). Plato on the soul, in Fine (Ed.), 35–55.
Matthews, G. B. (2003). Augustine on the mind’s search for itself. Faith and Philosophy, 20, 415–429.
Robinson, T. M. (2000). The defining features of the mind-body dualism in the writings of Plato, in Wright & Potter (Eds.), 35–56.
Sharples, R. W. (2008). Alexander Aphrodisiensis De anima libri mantissa. A new edition of the Greek text with introduction and commentary. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Shields, C. (2011). Aristotle’s psychology. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophyhttp://plato.stanford.edu
Sorabji, R. (2005). The philosophy of the commentators. Volume 1: Psychology (with ethics and religion). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Tieleman, T. L. (1996). Galen and Chrysippus on the soul: Argument and refutation in the De placitis books II and III (Philosophia Antiqua 58). Leiden: Brill.
von Staden, H. (2000). Hellenistic theories of body and soul, in Wright & Potter (Eds.), 79–116.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lagerlund, H., Sihvola, J. (2014). Ancient Theories. In: Knuuttila, S., Sihvola, J. (eds) Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6967-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6967-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6966-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6967-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)