Skip to main content

The Subjectivity of Systems Objects as a Scientific Object

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolution-adjusted Tumor Pathophysiology:
  • 491 Accesses

Abstract

The subjectivity of systems participators emerges as ubiquitously occurring attainment of biological systems and facilitates multifaceted rationalizations for constituting the characteristic normativity of biological systems. The ‘living world’ of biological systems creates the background for establishing subjectivity of socialized—that means reciprocally communicating—systems participators and allows the redirection of systems normativity by combined modularized approaches: (1) Biomodulatory interventions exemplarily show that the available background knowledge of biological systems participators and practices of the related communication-derived rules of the systems ‘living world’ may now be conveyed for scientific proof, namely to the accustomed object side of natural sciences. (2) Evolution-adjusted pathophysiology may now practically use the architecture of the ‘living world’. (3) Evolution-adjusted pathophysiology has access to the ‘living world’ of biological systems by providing the knowledge for evolving and redirecting the normativity of these systems. (4) Because of the assumed evolutionarily linked subjectivity of systems objects on the background of the systems ‘living world’ and the modular knowledge of systems participators, evolution fuses a dichotomy by simultaneously emerging in a directed and an undirected manner. In response, the modular knowledge of systems participators may be redeemed endogenously by ‘natural’ tumor evolution and ‘artificially’ (synthetic biology, gene transfection, etc.) by therapeutic approaches, i.e. combined modularized (top-down) or single track (bottom-up) interventions. The alternative to the introduction of a ‘living world’ of biological systems would be the assumption of some deeply grounded biological perspectives: Then, biological systems would disintegrate into the particularism of suggested relevant cuttings of the ‘living world’ in the sense of neopragmatism. Darwinian ‘selection’ as a possible principle to explain evolution history would be one of these perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Reichle A, Hildebrandt GC (2009) Principles of modular tumor therapy. Cancer Microenviron 2(Suppl 1):227–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reichle A, Hildebrandt GC (2008) Systems biology: a therapeutic target for tumor therapy. Cancer Microenviron 1:159–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin C, Yang L, Tanasa B et al (2009) Nuclear receptor-induced chromosomal proximity and DNA breaks underlie specific translocations in cancer. Cell 139:1069–1083

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Raaijmakers MH, Mukherjee S, Guo S et al (2010) Bone progenitor dysfunction induces myelodysplasia and secondary leukaemia. Nature 464:852–857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reichle A, Hildebrandt GC (2010) The comparative uncovering of tumor systems biology by modularly targeting tumor-associated inflammation. FROM MOLECULAR TO MODULAR TUMOR THERAPY. The Tumor Microenviron 3(4):287–303. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9531-2

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reichle A, Hildebrandt GC (2010) Uncovering tumor systems biology by Biomodulatory therapy strategies. FROM MOLECULAR TO MODULAR TUMOR THERAPY. The Tumor Microenviron 3(4):287–303. doi:10. 1007/978-90-481-9531-2_13

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reichle A, Hildebrandt GC (2010) Searching for the ‘Metabolism’ of evolution. FROM MOLECULAR TO MODULAR TUMOR THERAPY. The Tumor Microenviron 3(4):305–309. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9531-2_14

    Google Scholar 

  8. Favaloro B, Allocati N, Graziano V, Di Ilio C, De Laurenzi V (2012) Role of apoptosis in disease. Aging 4(5):330–349

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gurdon JB, Melton DA (2008) Nuclear reprogramming in cells. Science 322(5909):1811–1815 Review

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Okita K, Yamanaka S (2011) Induced pluripotent stem cells: opportunities and challenges. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366(1575):2198–2207 Review

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pitteri SJ, Kelly-Spratt KS, Gurley KE et al (2011) Tumor microenvironment-derived proteins dominate the plasma proteome response during breast cancer induction and progression. Cancer Res 71:5090–5100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haudek-Prinz VJ, Klepeisz P, Slany A, Griss J, Meshcheryakova A, Paulitschke V, Mitulovic G, Stöckl J, Gerner C (2012) Proteome signatures of inflammatory activated primary human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Proteomics 76:150–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Paulitschke V, Gruber S, Hofstätter E, Haudek-Prinz V, Klepeisz P, Schicher N, Jonak C, Petzelbauer P, Pehamberger H, Gerner C, Kunstfeld R (2012) Proteome analysis identified the PPARγ ligand 15d-PGJ2 as a novel drug inhibiting melanoma progression and interfering with tumor-stroma interaction. PLoS One 7(9):e46103. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046103

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kiessling F, Lederle W (2010) Early detection of systems response: Molecular and functional imaging of angiogenesis. In: Reichle A, editor. FROM MOLECULAR TO MODULAR TUMOR THERAPY: The Tumor Microenviron 3(6):385–403. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9531-2_20

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reichle A, Hildebrandt GC (2010) To be an object in a biological system: the necessity of a formal-pragmatic communication theory. FROM MOLECULAR TO MODULAR TUMOR THERAPY. The Tumor Microenviron 3(9):537–544. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9531-2_26

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas F, Fisher D, Fort P et al (2013) Applying ecological and evolutionary theory to cancer: a long and winding road. Evol Appl 6(1):1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ewald PW, Swain Ewald HA (2013) Toward a general evolutionary theory of oncogenesis. Evol Appl 6(1):70–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Reichle A, Hildebrandt GC (2010) Searching for the ‘Metabolism’ of evolution. FROM MOLECULAR TO MODULAR TUMOR THERAPY. The Tumor Microenviron 3(4):305–309. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9531-2_14

    Google Scholar 

  19. Darwin C (2009) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London 1859

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albrecht Reichle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reichle, A. (2013). The Subjectivity of Systems Objects as a Scientific Object. In: Reichle, A. (eds) Evolution-adjusted Tumor Pathophysiology:. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6866-6_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics