Abstract
Kalantzis and Cope set for themselves an ambitious and (in part) commendable task in “Education is the New Philosophy:” to re-think the disciplinary underpinnings of education, and to elevate it from an applied sub-discipline to an undertaking on par with “big science .” This chapter explains why a re-thinking of education and its disciplinary positioning is valuable, but it also takes issue with the unqualified reach of Kalantzis and Cope’s argument. To aver that education is an originary science and science for all sciences, is to take the current move to the “sciences” in educational discourse (learning sciences, brain sciences, et cetera) to a level not known in the Western tradition since the optimism of the enlightenment of the eighteenth century. My response concludes by making the case that education is less of a “positive,” unifying metadisciplinary enterprise than it is an engagement with negativity, in its dialectical sense – with that which is not, not yet and not known.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Husserl understood this “science of the lifeworld ” as rather different than a natural science (namely, as a neo-platonic realm of experiential essences) hence his response of a transcendental phenomenology to the crisis of European (or Western) sciences.
References
Arendt H (1977) [1958] The crisis in education. In: Between past and future: eight exercises in political thought (trans: Lindley D). Penguin, New York, pp 173–196
Biesta G (2009) Disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity in the academic study of education: comparing traditions of educational theorising. A paper presented at the annual conference of the British Educational Research Association, Manchester. Retrieved from: http://www.ioe.stir.ac.uk/documents/DisciplinarityandInterdisciplinarityintheAcademicStudyofEducation_ComparingTraditionsofEduca.pdf
Hoskin KW (1993) Education and the genesis of disciplinarity: the unexpected reversal. In: Messer-Davidow E, Shumway DR, Sylvan DJ (eds) Knowledges: historical and critical studies in disciplinarity. UP of Virginia, Charlottesville, pp 271–305
Husserl E (1970) The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Northwestern University Press, Evanston
Nohl H (1928/1987) Die pädagogische Bewegung in Deutschland und ihre Theorie. Klosterman, Frankfurt
Sawyer RK (ed) (2006) The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Friesen, N. (2014). Education, Science and the Lifeworld: A Response to “Education Is the New Philosophy”. In: Reid, A., Hart, E., Peters, M. (eds) A Companion to Research in Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6808-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6809-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)