Skip to main content

MacIntyre’s Critique of Management

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Virtue Ethics in Business and Management
  • 94 Accesses

Abstract

What MacIntyre says of management has always been highly critical. This account of his critique focusses on After Virtue. It first discusses the book’s subversion of managerial claims to expertise by attacking their justification in claims of social scientific certainty, before moving on to his critique of managers’ characteristic manipulation of their subordinates. Such manipulation, he argued, demonstrates that the emotive usage of moral terms has become detached from their meaning within a once coherent scheme of teleological ethics. The reformation of such a scheme must resist the modern fragmentation of morality and compartmentalization of life, and such resistance must begin from ordinary moral agents’ resistance to their disempowerment and demoralization through their systemic subordination to institutionalized management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Fink H, MacIntyre A (1997) introduction. In: Løgstrup KE (ed) The ethical demand (trans: Jensen T et al). University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight K (2007) Aristotelian philosophy: ethics and politics from Aristotle to Macintyre. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (1973) Ideology, social science, and revolution. Comp Polit 5(3):321–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (1988) Whose justice? Which rationality? University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (1991) How to seem virtuous without actually being so. Centre for the Study of Cultural Values, Lancaster

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (1998) The theses on Feuerbach: a road not taken. In: Knight K (ed) The MacIntyre Reader. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (1999) Dependent rational animals: why human beings need the virtues. Open Court, Peru

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (2007) After virtue: a study in moral theory, 3rd edn. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (2011) Where we were, where we are, where we need to be. In: Blackledge P, Knight K (eds) Virtue and politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s revolutionary Aristotelianism. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (2013) Relies. Rev Int Philos 67(2):201–220

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (2015) The irrelevance of ethics. In: Bielskis A, Knight K (eds) Virtue and economy: essays on morality and markets. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1976) Theses on Feuerbach (trans: Lough W). In: Cohen J, Marx K, Engels F et al (ed) Collected works, vol 5. Progress Publishers, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelvin Knight .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Knight, K. (2015). MacIntyre’s Critique of Management. In: Sison, A. (eds) Handbook of Virtue Ethics in Business and Management. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6729-4_3-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6729-4_3-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6729-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics