Skip to main content

Philosophical Issues in Ecology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Philosophy of Biology

Part of the book series: History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences ((HPTL,volume 1))

Abstract

Ecology endeavors to explain significant portions of the living world. The sophisticated experimental tests and mathematical theories developed to do so deserve much more attention from philosophers of science. This paper describes some of the main contours of the newly emerging field of philosophy of ecology: how an ecological perspective shaped Darwin’s theory, particularly the niche concept and the idea that there is a “balance of nature”; the character and metaphysical status of biological communities; whether there are laws of ecology; and the concept of ecological stability. As these topics illustrate, ecology concerns a diverse conceptual terrain and an interesting set of theoretical and methodological issues that provide rich grist for philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Kohn (2009) for further analysis of Darwin’s conceptualization of this metaphor.

  2. 2.

    Elton’s (1927) niche concept seems to also allow vacant niches, but with a very different sense. Vacant Eltonian niches would be unfilled nodes in the causal nexus of interactions between species.

  3. 3.

    See Eliot (2011a) for a historically engaging and conceptually rich account of this debate, one that locates the divergence more in methodological disagreements about how ecological research should be conducted than contrasting ontological commitments.

  4. 4.

    Marc Lange’s (2005) recent analysis of what biological laws could be seems vulnerable to Beatty’s first horn (see also Lange this volume).

  5. 5.

    Ginzburg and Colyvan (2004) note that the Kleiber allometry is the most empirically well supported, and that the generation time and Fenchel allometries are likely based on it.

  6. 6.

    In the following, ‘ecological stability’ designates stability of a biological community unless otherwise specified, though most of the discussion also applies to the stability of a biological population or an ecosystem.

  7. 7.

    To illustrate the partial dependence of M on R, notice that the species referred to in R must be part of the system description M.

  8. 8.

    As noted above, different quantitative measures of resistance, resilience, and tolerance may be incompatible. This does not establish, however, that the corresponding concepts are incompatible.

References

  • Abrams, P. 1983. The theory of limiting similarity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14: 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. 1990. The green machine: Ecology and the balance of nature. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J. 1995. The evolutionary contingency thesis. In Concepts, theories, and rationality in the biological sciences, ed. G. Wolters and J. Lennox, 49–81. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, P. 1976. Malthus, Darwin, and the concept of struggle. Journal of the History of Ideas 37: 631–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budiansky, S. 1995. Nature’s Keepers: The new science of nature management. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, Fredric E. 1916. Plant succession, an analysis of the development of vegetation. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institute.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colinvaux, P. 1979. Why big fierce animals are rare: An Ecologist’s perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. 1992. Niche: A bifurcation in the conceptual lineage of the term. In Key words in evolutionary biology, ed. E.F. Keller and E.S. Lloyd, 241–248. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, E., and E. McCoy. 1979. The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. American Naturalist 113: 791–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G. 2003. The science of the struggle for existence: On the foundations of ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J., and H. Allen. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of the species, 1st ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., and R. Shaw. 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292: 673–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis, D., and J. Waterhouse. 1987. Equilibrium and non-equilibrium concepts in ecological models. Ecological Monographs 57: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1964. Biology, molecular and organismic. American Zoologist 4: 443–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1973. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher 35: 125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J., C. Glymour, and S. Mitchell, (Eds). 2002. Ceteris paribus laws. Erkenntnis 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egerton, F.N. 1973. Changing concepts of the balance of nature. Quarterly Review of Biology 48: 322–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, C. 2011a. The legend of order and chaos: Communities and early community ecology. In Handbook of the philosophy of ecology, ed. K. de Laplante, B. Brown, and K. Peacocke, 49–108. Haarlem: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, C. 2011b. Competition theory and channeling explanation. Philosophy and Theory in Biology 3: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C. [1927] 2001. Animal ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereshefsky, M. 2001. The poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergazaki, M., and G. Ampatzidis. 2012. Students’ reasoning about the future of disturbed or protected ecosystems & the idea of the ‘balance of nature’. Research in Science Education 42: 511–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gause, G.F. 1934. The struggle for existence. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg, L.R., and M. Colyvan. 2004. Ecological orbits: How planets move and populations grow. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer, J. 1992. Niche: Historical perspectives. In Key words in evolutionary biology, ed. E.F. Keller and E.S. Lloyd, 231–240. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, J. 1917. The niche-relationships of the California Thrasher. Auk 34: 427–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E. 1866. General morphology of organisms. Berlin: Reimer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131: 1292–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbold, B., and P. Moyle. 1986. Introduced species and vacant niches. The American Naturalist 128: 751–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovardas, T., and K. Korfiatis. 2011. Towards a critical re-appraisal of ecology education: Scheduling an educational intervention to revisit the ‘balance of nature’ metaphor. Science & Education 20: 1039–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell, S. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G.E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22: 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G.E. 1961. The paradox of the plankton. American Naturalist 95: 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justus, J. 2008a. Complexity, diversity, stability. In A companion to the philosophy of biology, ed. S. Sarkar and A. Plutynski, 321–350. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justus, J. 2008b. Ecological and Lyapunov stability. Philosophy of Science 75: 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justus, J. 2011. A case study in concept determination: Ecological diversity. In Handbook of the philosophy of ecology, ed. K. de Laplante, B. Brown, and K. Peacock. New York: Elsevier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a physical world: An essay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsland, S. 1995. Modeling nature: Episodes in the history of population ecology, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, D. 2009. Darwin’s Keystone: The principle of divergence. In Cambridge companion to the “origin of species”, ed. M. Ruse and R. Richards, 87–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kot, M. 2001. Elements of mathematical ecology. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. 2001. Ecology. New York: Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, D. 1954. The natural regulation of animal numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, M. 2005. Ecological laws: What would they be and why would they matter? Oikos 110: 394–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J. 1984. Non-competitive populations, non-convergent communities, and vacant niches: The herbivores of bracken. In Ecological communities: Conceptual issues and the evidence, ed. D. Strong, D. Simberloff, L. Abele, and A. Thistle, 67–101. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibold, M.A. 1995. The niche concept revisited: Mechanistic models and community context. Ecology 76: 1371–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linquist, S. 2008. But is it progress? On the alleged advances of conservation biology over ecology. Biology and Philosophy 23: 529–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. 1958. Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology 39: 599–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R., and E.O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclaurin, J., and K. Sterelny. 2008. What is biodiversity? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. 1974. Stability and complexity in model ecosystems, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelson, G. 2003. Ecological kinds and ecological laws. Philosophy of Science 70: 1390–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millstein, R. forthcoming. Exploring the status of population genetics: The role of ecology. Biological theory: Integrating development, evolution and cognition. Special issue on The meaning of ‘theory’ in biology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odenbaugh, J. 2001. Ecological stability, model building, and environmental policy: A reply to some of the pessimism. Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 68: S493–S505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odenbaugh, J. 2007. Seeing the forest and the trees. Philosophy of Science 74: 628–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee, F., K. Laland, and M. Feldman. 2003. Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. 2000. Evolutionary ecology. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. 1979. Complexity and stability: Another look at MacArthur’s original hypothesis. Oikos 33: 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. 1984. The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Ecology 61: 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. 2002. The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, H., M. Colyvan, and M. Burgman. 2002. A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecological Applications 12: 618–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reydon, T. 2013. Classifying life, reconstructing history and teaching diversity: Philosophical issues in the teaching of biological systematics and biodiversity. Science & Education 22: 189–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. 1992. Species diversity gradients: We know more and less than we thought. Journal of Mammalogy 73: 715–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. 2005. Biodiversity and environmental philosophy: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K. 1990. Island biogeography, species-area curves, and statistical errors: Applied biology and scientific rationality. PSA 1990: S447–S456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K.S., and E.D. McCoy. 1993. Method in ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin, L.B. 1961. Growth and regulation of animal populations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. 1987. Does ‘fitness’ fit the facts. Journal of Philosophy 84: 220–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. 2007. Evidence and value freedom. In Value-free science – Ideal or illusion? ed. H. Kinkaid, J. Dupré, and A. Wylie, 109–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, R. 1957. Haeckel, Darwin, and ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology 32: 138–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K. 2001. The reality of ecological assemblages: A palaeo-ecological puzzle. Biology and Philosophy 16: 437–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K. 2006. Local ecological communities. Philosophy of Science 73: 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K., and P. Griffiths. 1999. Sex and death, 253–280. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., S. Kilham, and P. Kilham. 1982. Phytoplankton community ecology: The role of limiting nutrients. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13: 349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, M., and K. Reisman. 2008. The Robust Volterra principle. Philosophy of Science 75: 106–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, G., J. Brown, and B. Enquist. 1997. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276: 122–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 26: 1–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worster, D. 1994. Nature’s economy: A history of ecological ideas. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Interactions with students in a Spring 2012 graduate seminar devoted to philosophy of ecology at FSU helped shape and improve this piece. Besides those students, thanks to Kostas Kampourakis, Roberta Millstein, Jay Odenbaugh, and Carl Salk for very helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Justus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Justus, J. (2013). Philosophical Issues in Ecology. In: Kampourakis, K. (eds) The Philosophy of Biology. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6537-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics