Skip to main content

Organizational Virtue

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Virtue Ethics in Business and Management

Part of the book series: International Handbooks in Business Ethics ((IHBE))

  • 131 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers positive organizational scholarship’s empirical research on the phenomenon of organizational virtue, which refers to the virtuous characteristics embodied in organizations as collectives. The nature of organizational virtue is discussed, relative to psychological and virtue ethics perspectives. Research findings are summarized, including a consideration of the mechanisms of buffering and amplifying that are presumed to underlie the observed relationships among organizational virtue and various outcomes. The chapter concludes with a reflection on future directions for the study of organizational virtue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aquino K, McFerran B, Laven M (2011) Moral identity and the experience of moral elevation in response to acts of uncommon goodness. J Pers Soc Psychol 100:703–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolino MC, Klotz AC, Turnley WH, Harvey J (2013) Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. J Organ Behav 34:542–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright DS, Cameron KS, Caza A (2006a) The amplifying and buffering effects of virtuousness in downsized organizations. J Bus Ethics 64:249–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright DS, Fry RE, Cooperrider DL (2006b) Forgiveness from the perspectives of three response modes: begrudgement, pragmatism, and transcendence. J Manag Spiritual Relig 3:78–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, (eds) (2003) Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS, Caza A (2002) Organizational and leadership virtues and the role of forgiveness. J Leadersh Org Stud 9:33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS, Caza A (2013) Virtuousness as a source of happiness in organizations. In: David SA, Boniwell I, Ayers AC (eds) Oxford handbook of happiness. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 676–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS, Lavine M (2006) Making the impossible possible: leading extraordinary performance – the Rocky Flats story. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS, Winn B (2012) Virtuousness in organizations. In: Cameron KS, Spreitzer GM (eds) Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 231–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS, Bright D, Caza A (2004) Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. Am Behav Sci 47:766–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS, Mora C, Leutscher T, Calarco M (2011) Effects of positive practices on organizational effectiveness. J Appl Behav Sci 47:266–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caza A, Cameron KS (2008) Positive organizational scholarship: what does it achieve? In: Clegg SR, Cooper CL (eds) SAGE handbook of organizational behavior, vol I. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 99–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Caza A, Carroll B (2012) Critical theory and positive organizational scholarship. In: Cameron KS, Spreitzer GM (eds) Handbook of positive organizational scholarship. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 965–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Caza A, Barker BA, Cameron KS (2004) Ethics and ethos: the buffering and amplifying effects of ethical behavior and virtuousness. J Bus Ethics 52:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2009) Connected: the surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. Little, Brown and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun R (2005) Ethical character and virtue of organizations: an empirical assessment and strategic implications. J Bus Ethics 57:269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun R (2009) A corporate’s responsibility to employees during a merger: organizational virtue and employee loyalty. Corp Gov 9:473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton JE, Sonenshein S (2009) Positive organizational scholarship. In: Lopez SJ (ed) Encyclopedia of positive psychology. Blackwell, Malden, pp 737–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton JE, Worline MC, Frost PJ, Lilius J (2006) Explaining compassion organizing. Adm Sci Q 51:59–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Epley N, Waytz A, Akalis S, Cacioppo JT (2008) When we need a human: motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Soc Cogn 26:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero I, Sison AJG (2014) A quantitative analysis of authors, schools and themes in virtue ethics articles in business ethics and management journals (1980–2011). Bus Ethics 23:375–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson BL (2009) Positivity. Crown, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert DT, Malone PS (1995) The correspondence bias. Psychol Bull 117:21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittell JH, Cameron K, Lim S, Rivas V (2006) Relationships, layoffs, and organizational resilience: airline industry responses to September 11. J Appl Behav Sci 42:300–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider F (1944) Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychol Rev 51:358–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanov JM, Maitlis S, Worline MC, Dutton JE, Frost PJ, Lilius JM (2004) Compassion in organizational life. Am Behav Sci 47:808–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson H (1965) Reciprocation: the relationship between man and organization. Adm Sci Q 9:370–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilius JM, Worline MC, Maitlis S, Kanov J, Dutton JE, Frost P (2008) The contours and consequences of compassion at work. J Organ Behav 29:193–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilius JM, Worline MC, Dutton JE, Kanov JM, Maitlis S (2011) Understanding compassion capability. Hum Relat 64:873–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manikandan K, Anipriya S (2014) Organizational justice, organizational virtuousness and performance among bank employees. SAARJ J Bank Insur Res 3:49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell LE (2001) Corporate irresponsibility: America’s newest export. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski ME, Kahai SS, Yammarino FJ (2011) Team virtues and performance: an examination of transparency, behavioral integrity, and trust. J Bus Ethics 99:201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan P (2001) The question of organizational consciousness: can organizations have values, virtues and visions? J Bus Ethics 29:271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rego A, Ribeiro N, Cunha, MP (2010) Perceptions of organizational virtuousness and happiness as predictors of organizational citizenship behaviors. J Bus Ethics 93:215–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Rego A, Ribeiro N, Cunha MP, Jesuino JC (2011) How happiness mediates the organizational virtuousness and affective commitment relationship. J Bus Res 64:524–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Rego A, Vitoria A, Magalhaes A, Ribeiro N, Cunha MP (2013) Are authentic leaders associated with more virtuous, committed and potent teams? Leadership Quarterly, 24:61–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Rego A, Junior DR, Cunha MP (2014) Authentic leaders promoting store performance: the mediating roles of virtuousness and potency. J Bus Ethics 128:617–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee S-Y, Dutton JE, Bagozzi RP (2006) Making sense of organizational actions with virtue frames and its links to organizational attachment. J Manag Spiritual Relig 3:34–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson AV, Clegg SR, Lopes M P, Cunha MP, Rego A, Pitsis T (2014) Doing compassion or doing discipline? Power relations and the Magdalene Laundries. J Polit Pow 7:253–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters L (2012) Predicting job satisfaction: contributions of individual gratitude and institutionalized gratitude. Psychology 3:1174–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetstone JT (2005) A framework for organizational virtue: the interrelationship of mission, culture and leadership. Bus Ethics 14:367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski LT (1996) Virtues of the mind: an inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arran Caza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Caza, A. (2017). Organizational Virtue. In: Sison, A., Beabout, G., Ferrero, I. (eds) Handbook of Virtue Ethics in Business and Management. International Handbooks in Business Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6510-8_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics