Abstract
Analyzing a new data set of 39,343 high-value patents, the authors find ample evidence that interindustry knowledge spillover between technologically, economically, and geographically related industries were a major source of innovative activities during German industrialization. It is discovered that most of the parallel patent booms of the successive waves of technological progress (railroads, dyes, chemicals, and electrical engineering) occurred in innovative industries that were closely related technologically. The authors then show that these industries were often also geographically clustered. Nearly all German regions that maintained or improved their above-average innovativeness over time had at least one innovative cluster in the fields of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, or chemicals. The existence and success of these innovative clusters suggest that knowledge spillover between firms of different industries occurred frequently and increased the innovative output of the firms involved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46, 385–406.
Aghion, P. (2008). Higher education and innovation. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 9, 28–45.
Baten, J., Spadavecchia, A., Streb, J., & Yin, S. (2007). What made southwest German firms innovative around 1900? Assessing the importance of intra- and inter-industry externalities. Oxford Economic Papers, 59, i105–i126.
Cantwell, J. (1989). Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Clark, G. (2007). A farewell to alms: A brief history of the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Degner, H. (2009). Schumpeterian German firms before and after World War I: The innovative few and the non-innovative many. Zeitschrift für Unternehmensgeschichte, 54, 50–72.
Degner, H., & Streb, J. (2010). Foreign patenting in Germany, 1877–1932 (FZID Discussion Papers 21-2010). Hohenheim: Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
DeLong, J. B., & Shleifer, A. (1993). Princes and merchants: European city growth before the Industrial Revolution. Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 671–702.
Denison, E. F. (1967). Why growth rates differ: Postwar experience in nine western countries. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Döring, T. (2004). Räumliche Wissens-Spillovers und regionales Wirtschaftswachstum [Spatial knowledge spillover and regional economic growth]. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 124, 95–137.
Fremdling, R. (1975). Eisenbahnen und deutsches Wirtschaftswachstum 1840–1879 [Railroads and German economic growth, 1840–1879]. Dortmund: Gesellschaft für westfälische Wirtschaftsgeschichte.
Galbraith, J. K. (1957). American capitalism: The concept of countervailing power (2nd ed.). London: Houghton Mifflin.
Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.
Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. London: Penguin.
Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Labuske, K., & Streb, J. (2008). Technological creativity and cheap labor? Explaining the growing international competitiveness of German mechanical engineering before World War I. German Economic Review, 9, 65–86.
Landes, D. (1998). The wealth and poverty of nations: Why some are so rich and some so poor. New York: W.W. Norton.
Lundvall, B.-Ả. (1988). Systems of innovation as an interactive process: From user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349–369). London: Pinter.
Metz, R., & Watteler, O. (2002). Historische Innovationsindikatoren: Ergebnis einer Pilotstudie [Historical innovation indicators]. Historical Social Research, 27, 4–129.
Mokyr, J. (1990). The levers of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Murmann, J. P. (2003). Knowledge and competitive advantage: The coevolution of firms, technology and national institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. Journal of Economic History, 49, 803–832.
Pakes, A. (1986). Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. Econometrica, 54, 755–784.
Polanyi, M. (1989). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reichspatentamt (Ed.). (1914). Blatt für Patent-, Muster- und Zeichenwesen [Patent, Design, and Drafting Registry]. Berlin: Carl Heymanns.
Schankerman, M., & Pakes, A. (1986). Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. The Economic Journal, 96, 1052–1076.
Seckelmann, M. (2006). Industrialisierung, Internationalisierung und Patentrecht im Deutschen Reich, 1871–1914 [Industrialization, internationalization, and patent law in the German Empire, 1871–1914]. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Sokoloff, K. L. (1988). Inventive activity in early industrial America: Evidence from patent records, 1790–1846. Journal of Economic History, 48, 813–850.
Spoerer, M., Baten, J., & Streb, J. (2007). Wissenschaftlicher Standort, Quellen und Potentiale der Innovationsgeschichte [Scientific location, sources, and potential of innovation history]. In R. Walter (Ed.), Innovationsgeschichte (pp. 39–59). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
Streb, J. (2003). Shaping the national system of inter-industry knowledge exchange: Vertical integration, licensing and repeated knowledge transfer in the German plastics industry. Research Policy, 32, 1125–1140.
Streb, J. (2004). Product differentiation by bundling standard good and innovative knowledge: Technological transfer in the German plastics industry from the 1930s to the 1970s. Journal of European Economic History, 33, 71–106.
Streb, J., Baten, J., & Yin, S. (2006). Technological and geographical knowledge spillover in the German Empire 1877–1918. Economic History Review, 59, 347–373.
Streb, J., Wallusch, J., & Yin, S. (2007). Knowledge spill-over from new to old industries: The case of German synthetic dyes and textiles 1878–1913. Explorations in Economic History, 44, 203–223.
Sullivan, R. J. (1994). Estimates of the value of patent rights in Great Britain and Ireland, 1852–1976. Economica, New Series, 61, 37–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Streb, J., Waidlein, N. (2013). Knowledge and Space in Economic History: Innovations in the German Empire, 1877–1918. In: Meusburger, P., Glückler, J., el Meskioui, M. (eds) Knowledge and the Economy. Knowledge and Space, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6131-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6131-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6130-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6131-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)