Skip to main content

Taiwan’s Five Major Metropolitan Areas of Taiwan Vulnerability Assessment of Flood Disaster Comparison Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development

Part of the book series: Strategies for Sustainability ((STSU))

  • 2614 Accesses

Abstract

This study explores the connotations of vulnerability, the proposed indicators of vulnerability using the Fuzzy Delphi expert panel, and the establishment of an indicators system. Afterward, a multi-criteria assessment of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process was applied to be able to identify the indicators of the vulnerability of urban class relations and the weight of the metropolitan area, in order to finalize the vulnerability and resilience of the indicators system. Finally, the proposed assessment framework was applied to the five major metropolitan areas in Taiwan as an empirical analysis. Research results satisfied all relevant vulnerability assessments, including exposure, sensitivity, and resilience; Fuzzy Delphi survey was utilized to adjust the indicators system for the metropolitan areas of Taiwan to establish the vulnerability of the flood disaster assessment framework. This study also found that hardware and software infrastructure, preparedness, and response capabilities and the ability to reconstruct and rehabilitate the assessment of vulnerability get more than half the weight. The study considers the opinions of different decision-making groups to assess the typhoon hazard vulnerability of each metropolitan area. The overall typhoon hazard vulnerability is Tainan> Taichung> Taoyuan Chungli> Kaohsiung> Taipei. Comparisons were made of the different aspects of vulnerability indicators for each area, and some policy suggestions were proposed, such as the following: (1) through hazard information, integrate and establish a complete disaster-prevention database; (2) strengthen preparation, emergency responsiveness, and resilience and adaptation ability; (3) balance the needs of disaster prevention among all regions; and (4) undertake preparation and disaster-prevention planning in different scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bankoff G (2004) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development, and people. James & James/Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J (2007) Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: applicability, usefulness and policy implications. Environ Hazards 7:20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang YH (1998) Transportation plan assessment and decision-making – study and application of fuzzy theory. Hwatai Culture, Taipei

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang KF (2009) Super decisions software manual-breakthrough of AHP research limit by ANP. Maoding Publishing, Taipei

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen CH (2001) Study of Asian Pacific port competitiveness and core strength index. Transportation 13(1):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen LC (2003) Application of earthquake hazard risk- effect analysis on land use planning: HAZ-Taiwan System. Urban Plann 30(4):281–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen LC, Chen HL (2007) Investigation of disaster-prone urban spatial development: formation of flood in Taipei basin as example. Urban Plann 34(3):293–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng TB (2001) Fuzzy assessment model for software organization to increase personnel ability maturity. Master thesis, Information Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey NC (1969) The Delphi Method: 9n experimental study of group opinion. RM-5888-PR. 48, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbecq AL et al (1975) Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopin GC (2006) Linkage between vulnerability, resilience and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):235–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao HC (2008) Establishment of flood vulnerability assessment model – Sijhih City as an example. PhD thesis, Department of Geology, Chinese Culture University

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin KH (2004) Vulnerability and adaptation research method and methodology study under global climate change. Glob Climate Change Commun 43:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL II et al (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/100/14/8074.pdf

  • White GF (1945) Human adjustment to floods. Research Paper 29. Department of Geography, University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • White GF, Haas JE (1975) Assessment of research on natural hazards. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jen-te Pai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pai, Jt. (2013). Taiwan’s Five Major Metropolitan Areas of Taiwan Vulnerability Assessment of Flood Disaster Comparison Study. In: Kawakami, M., Shen, Zj., Pai, Jt., Gao, Xl., Zhang, M. (eds) Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development. Strategies for Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5922-0_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics