Skip to main content

Maize Revolutions in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An African Green Revolution

Abstract

Maize remains crucial for food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. In some regions, the predominance of the crop in farming systems and diets implies that yield gains have the potential to jump-start a Green Revolution like those experienced in Asia for rice and wheat. However, despite episodes of success, the evidence compiled here suggests that very little progress has been made toward achieving this potential in recent years. Reversing this condition remains crucial to agricultural growth and food security in Africa.

Over the long term, large investments and sustained political commitment are needed to ensure strong plant breeding and seed systems to serve smallholders, predicated on improved crop management practices to protect soils and cope with unreliable rainfall, and access to appropriate labor-saving technologies. More innovative extension and advisory systems are also needed to facilitate farmer learning and adapt techniques and technologies to local environmental and social conditions. Better financial services, perhaps including new forms of insurance, are needed for smallholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For consistency, despite well-known limitations, all figures reported in this section are calculated from FAOSTAT data available at http://faostat.fao.org. Regional names are those used by FAO, although countries included by region differ. Country lists are compared in the Appendix.

  2. 2.

    An additional 2.8 million ha is grown in South Africa, mostly on large-scale commercial farms (averaging about 380 ha each), much of it yellow maize for animal feed. Owing to its apartheid legacy, smallholder maize contributes less than 15% of national production, and accounts for a only a minor fraction of household income of black rural families. Maize marketing and pricing policy issues focus primarily on keeping food prices at tolerable levels for urban consumers, and ensuring the continued viability of the large commercial farm sector, with very little attention to smallholder maize production or marketing. National yields have steadily improved to reach about 5 t/ha while area has declined. Except in drought years, South Africa produces a modest maize surplus for export. Yield increases partly reflect deregulation of the industry and the reduction of maize area where it is no longer competitive because of lower yields and higher risks. Commercial farmers have also invested substantially to improve maize production. About one quarter of the area is irrigated. In Northern Cape Province, where all maize is irrigated, yields are around 10 t/ha. Farmers also use advanced maize hybrids, including genetically modified seed, and apply about 75 kg/ha of fertilizer nutrients, much higher than elsewhere in Africa. Given its uniqueness, we have chosen to not to include South Africa in analysis of regional data.

  3. 3.

    By region, no trend is apparent in per capita maize consumption over the past five decades, although a slight increase is visible in Central Africa. However, in Ethiopia, maize as a percentage of daily energy has nearly doubled from 10% in 1961–1963 to 19% in 2003–2005.

  4. 4.

    Because of the difficulty in measuring areas planted to improved OPVs, in particular, estimates should be considered with caution. Almost all of the maize area in West African countries, with the exception of Nigeria, is planted to improved open-pollinated varieties. Given that the private seed system has not been active, it is likely that farmers practice seed saving for much more than the recommended number of years and because of cross-pollination, it may be difficult to differentiate improved from unimproved materials.

  5. 5.

    Technologies and management practices to reduce post harvest losses should be added to the list of opportunities for improving the efficiency of the maize supply chain. Various estimates put post harvest losses for maize grown by smallholders in the humid tropics of Africa at 15–20%.

  6. 6.

    Nongovernmental organizations and national research organizations accounted for a scant 4% of all seed marketed in the region.

References

  • Alemu D, Mwangi W, Nigussie M, Spielman DJ (2007) An analysis of maize seed production and distribution systems in Ethiopia’s rift valley, vol 72, Research report. Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • Alene AD, Menkir A, Ajala SO, Badu-Apraku B, Alanrewaju AS, Manyong VM, Ndiaye A (2009) The economic and poverty impacts of maize research in West and Central Africa. Agric Econ 40(5):535–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR, Feder G (2003) Rural extension services, vol 2976, World Bank policy research working paper. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR, Feder G, Ganguly SS (2006) The rise and fall of training and visit extension: an Asian mini-drama with an African epilogue. World Bank, Development Research Group, Rural Development Team, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariga J, Jayne TS (2010) Unlocking the market: fertilizer and maize in Kenya. In: Spielman D, Pandya-Lorch R (eds) Millions fed: proven successes in agricultural development, Chapter 14. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

  • Balcet J-CL, Candler W (1981) Farm technology adoption in Northern Nigeria. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Beintema NM, Stads GJ (2006) Agricultural research and development in Sub-Saharan Africa: an era of stagnation, agricultural science and technology indicators. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Benin S, Nkonya E, Okecho G, Randriamamonjy J, Kato E, Lubade G, Kyotalimye M (2011) Returns to spending on agricultural extension: the case of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) program of Uganda. Agric Econ 42:249–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonger T, Ayele G, Kumsa T (2004) Agricultural extension, adoption and diffusion in Ethiopia, vol 1, Research report. Ethiopian Development Research Institute, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee D, Eicher CK (1997) Africa’s emerging maize revolution. Lynne Rienner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee D, Heisey PW (1997) Evolution of the African maize economy. In: Byerlee D, Eicher CK (eds) Africa’s emerging maize revolution. Lynne Rienner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee D, Jayne TS, Myers RJ (2006) Managing food price risks and instability in a liberalizing market environment: overview and policy options. Food Policy 31(4):275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapoto A, Jayne TS (2009) Effects of maize marketing and trade policy on price unpredictability in Zambia, vol 38, Food security country working paper. Michigan State University, Lusaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver K (1993) Making agricultural extension work in Africa. In: Russell NC, Dowswell CR (eds) Policy options for agricultural development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sasakawa Global 2000, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson P (1982) Farming systems research in Eastern Africa: the experience of CIMMYT and some national agricultural research services, 1976–81, vol 3, MSU international development papers. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana J, Gilbert CL, Shim E (2006) Hedging grain price risk in the SADC: case studies of Malawi and Zambia. Food Policy 31(4):357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis K (2008) Extension in Sub-Saharan Africa: overview and assessment of past and current models, and future prospects. J Int Agri Ext Edu 15(1):15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis K, Nkonya E, Kato E, Mekonnen DA, Odendo M, Miiro R, Nkuba J, Okoth J (2010) Impact of farmer field schools on agricultural productivity and poverty in East Africa, Discussion paper. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groote H, Kimeju S, Owuor G, Wanyama J (2006) Market liberalization and agricultural intensification in Kenya. Contributed paper presented at 26th conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economics, Gold Coast, Australia, August

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger K, Byerlee D (2011) Rising global interests in farmland: can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dorward A, Chirwa E, Boughton D, Crawford E, Jayne TS, Slater R, Kelly V, Tsoka M (2008) Towards “smart” subsidies in agriculture? Lessons from recent experience in Malawi. Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorward A, Chirwa E, Jayne T (2010) The Malawi agricultural inputs subsidy programme, 2005/6 to 2008/9. Report prepared for the “Yes Africa can: success stories from a dynamic continent” project, World Bank Group, Africa Region

    Google Scholar 

  • Eicher CK (1995) Zimbabwe’s maize-based Green Revolution: preconditions for replication. World Dev 23(5):805–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps M (1992) Cash crop production, food price volatility and rural market integration in the third world. Am J Agric Econ 74(1):90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer RA, Byerlee D, Edmeades GO (2009) Can technology deliver on the yield challenge to 2050? Paper presented at the expert meeting on how to feed the world in 2050. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (1997) White maize: a traditional food grain in developing countries. FAO/CIMMYT, Rome/Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautam M (2000) Agricultural extension: the Kenyan experience. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart J (1975) The diffusion of hybrid maize in western Kenya. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert E, Phillips LC, Roberts W, Sarch MT, Smale M, Stroud A (1993) Maize research impact in Africa: the obscured revolution. Division of Food, Agriculture and Resources Analysis, Office of Analysis, Research and Technical Support, Bureau for Africa, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert RA, Bezner-Kerr R, Kanyama-Phiri GY (2010) Biodiversity supports ecosystem services for a greener revolution in Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci 07(48, November):20840–20845

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller KE, Tittonell P, Witter E, Corbeels M (2009) Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: the heretics’ view. Field Crops Res 114(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govereh J, Haggblade S, Nielson H, Tschirley D (2008) Maize marketsheds in Eastern and Southern Africa. Report prepared by Michigan State University for the World Bank under contract No. 7144132, June

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggblade S, Tembo G, Kaboré D, Reij C, Ajayi OC, Franzel S, Mafongoya P, Place F (2010) Sustainable soil fertility management systems. In: Hand S, Hazell P (eds) Successes in African agriculture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan RM (1998) Maize technology development and transfer. CAB International, CIMMYT, KARI, Wallingford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan RM, Mekuria M, Mwangi W (2001) Maize breeding research in Eastern and Southern Africa: current status and impacts of past investments made by public and private sectors, 1966–1997. CIMMYT, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisey PW, Edmeades GO (1999) Maize production in drought-stressed environments: technical options and research resource allocation. CIMMYT 1997/1998 world maize facts and trends. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisey PW, Norton G (2007) Fertilizers and other farm chemicals. In: Evenson RE, Pingali PL (eds) Handbook of agricultural economics, vol 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisey PW, Smale M (1995) Maize technology in Malawi: a Green Revolution in the making? International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden S, Lunduka R (2010a) Too poor to be efficient? Impacts of the targeted fertilizer subsidy program in Malawi on farm plot level input use, crop choice and land productivity. Report to Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. Department of Economics and Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden S, Lunduka R (2010b) NORAD-project: impacts of the fertilizer subsidy program in Malawi: targeting, household perceptions and preferences. Mimeo, Norwegian University of Life Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard JA (1994) The economic impact of improved maize varieties in Zambia. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard J, Mungoma C (1997) Zambia’s stop-and-go maize revolution. In: Byerlee D, Eicher CK (eds) Africa’s emerging maize revolution. Lynne Rienner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayne TS, Jones S (1997) Food marketing and pricing policy in Eastern and Southern Africa: a survey. World Dev 25(9):1505–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayne TS, Myers RJ, Nyoro J (2008) The effects of government maize marketing policies on maize prices in Kenya. Agric Econ 38(3):313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayne TS, Mason N, Myers R, Ferris J, Mather D, Beaver M, Lenski N, Chapoto A, Boughton D (2010) Patterns and trends in food staples markets in Eastern and Southern Africa: toward the identification of priority investments and strategies for developing markets and promoting smallholder productivity growth, vol 104, International development working paper. Michigan State University, East Lansing

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydd J (1989) Maize research in Malawi: lessons from failure. J Int Dev 11(1):112–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kydd J (2009) A new institutional economic analysis of the state and agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Kirsten JF, Dorward AR, Poulton C, Vink N (eds) Institutional economics perspectives on African agricultural development. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Langyintuo AS, Mwangi W, Diallo AO, MacRobert J, Dixon J, Banziger M (2008) An analysis of the bottlenecks affecting the production and deployment of maize seed in Eastern and Southern Africa. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Harare

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson DF, Otsuka K, Kajisa K, Estudillo J, Diagne A (2010) Fostering a Green Revolution in rice: can Africa replicate Asia’s experience? In: Pandey S, Byerlee D, Dawe D, Dobermann A, Mohanty S, Rozelle S, Hardy B (eds) Rice in the global economy: strategic research and policy issues for food security. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos

    Google Scholar 

  • Loìpez-Pereira MA, Morris ML (1994) Impacts of international maize breeding research in the developing world, 1966–1990. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Low ARC (1988) Farm household economics and the design and impact of biological research in Southern Africa. Agric Adm Ext 29(1):23–34

    Google Scholar 

  • John L, Gilbert E, Elliot H, Blis F (2010) Evolving a plant breeding and seed system in Sub-Saharan Africa in an era of donor dependence. A report for the global initiative on plant breeding capacity building, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann CK (2007) Malawi’s starter pack: a smarter subsidy to empower the poor with science-based agriculture. Africa Policy J 4 (Spring/Summer, 2008), Harvard Kennedy School of Government

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyong VM, Kling JG, Makinde KO, Ajala SO, Menkir A (2003) Impact of IITA germplasm improvement on maize production in West and Central Africa. In: Evenson RE, Gollin D (eds) Crop variety improvement and its effect on productivity. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Marenya PP, Barrett CB (2009a) Soil quality and fertilizer use rates among smallholder farmers in Western Kenya. Agric Econ 40(5):561–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marenya PP, Barrett CB (2009b) State-conditional fertilizer yield response on Western Kenyan Farms. Am J Agric Econ 91(4):991–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason N, Jayne TS, Chapoto A, Donovan C (2011) Putting the 2007/2008 global food crisis in longer-term perspective: trends in staple food affordability in urban Zambia and Kenya. Food Policy 36(3):350–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minde I, Jayne T, Ariga J, Govereh J, Crawford E (2008) Fertilizer subsidies and sustainable agricultural growth in Africa: current issues and empirical evidence from Malawi, Zambia, and Kenya. Report for regional strategic agricultural knowledge support systems for Southern Africa, based at International Water Management Institute, Pretoria, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Mistiaen J (2006) Poor and inefficient? Scientists, farmers and the maize yield gap in Kenya, Draft paper. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris ML (1998) Maize in the developing world: waiting for a Green Revolution. In: Morris ML (ed) Maize seed industries in developing countries. Lynne Rienner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris ML, Mekuria M, Gerpacio R (2003) Impacts of CIMMYT maize breeding research. In: Evenson RE, Gollin D (eds) Crop variety improvement and its effect on productivity. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris ML, Kelly VA, Kopicki RJ, Byerlee D (2007) Promoting increased fertilizer use in Africa: lessons learned and good practice guidelines. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyoro J, Kirimi L, Jayne TS (2004) Competitiveness of Kenyan and Ugandan maize production: challenges for the future, vol 10, Working paper. Egerton University/Tegemeo Institute, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricker-Gilbert J, Jayne TS (2009) Do fertilizer subsidies affect the demand for commercial fertilizer? An example from Malawi. Contributed paper presented at the international association of agricultural economists conference, Beijing, China, 16–22 Aug

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricker-Gilbert J, Jayne TS, Chirwa E (2011) Subsidies and crowding out: a double-hurdle model of fertilizer demand in Malawi. Am J Agric Econ 93(1):26–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbach DD (1988) The economics of smallholder maize production in Zimbabwe: implications for food security, vol 11, MSU international development paper. Michigan State University, East Lansing

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer J, Tchale H (2009) The economics of soil fertility management in Malawi. Rev Agric Econ 31(3):535–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setimela PS, Badu-Apraku B, Mwangi W (2009) Variety testing and release approaches in DTMA project countries in sub-Saharan Africa. CIMMYT, Harare

    Google Scholar 

  • Smale M (1995) Maize is life: Malawi’s delayed green revolution. World Dev 23(5):819–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smale M, Jayne TS (2003) Maize in Eastern and Southern Africa: ‘seeds’ of success in retrospect, vol 97, EPTD discussion paper. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Smale M, Phiri A, with contributions from Chikafa GA, Heisey P, Mahatta F, Msowoya MNS, Mwanyongo EBK, Sagawa HG, Selemani HAC (1998) Institutional change and discontinuities in farmers. Use of hybrid maize and fertilizer in Malawi: findings from the 1996–7 CIMMYT/MOA survey. Economics Working Paper 98-01, CIMMYT

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Weber G, Manyong MV, Fakorede MAV (1997) Fostering sustainable increases in maize productivity in Nigeria. In: Byerlee D, Eicher CK (eds) Africa’s emerging maize revolution. Lynne Rienner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielman DJ, Byerlee D, Alemu D, Kelemework D (2010) Policies to promote cereal intensification in Ethiopia: the search for appropriate public and private roles. Food Policy 35(3):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp R, Wijeratne M, Piyadasa VH (2005) What should we expect from farmer field schools? A Sri Lanka case study. World Dev 33(10):1705–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschirley D, Jayne TS (2010) Exploring the logic of Southern Africa’s food crises. World Dev 38(1):76–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg H, Jiggins J (2007) Investing in farmers: the impacts of farmer field schools in relation to integrated pest management. World Dev 35(4):663–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1994) Agricultural extension: lessons from completed projects. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005) Managing food price risks and instability in an environment of market liberalization. Agriculture and Rural Development Department, World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2008) World development report 2008: agriculture for development. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2009) Awakening Africa’s sleeping giant prospects for commercial agriculture in the Guinea savannah zone and beyond. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Guan Z, Jayne TS, Black R (2009) Factors influencing the profitability of fertilizer use on maize in Zambia. Agric Econ 40(4):437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melinda Smale .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Country Classification Used to Analyze FAOSTAT Data

Appendix: Country Classification Used to Analyze FAOSTAT Data

The country classification used in this chapter differs from that used by FAOSTAT, with the exception Western Africa. Data was loaded for each country and summarized according to the following classifications:

Eastern Africa

Southern Africa

Western Africa

Central Africa

Burundi

Angola

FAO

FAO without

Comoros

Botswana

Angola

Eritrea

Lesotho

 

Ethiopia

Malawi

 

Kenya

Madagascar

 

Mauritius

Mozambique

 

Reunion

South Africa

 

Rwanda

Swaziland

 

Somalia

Zambia

 

Tanzania

Zimbabwe

 

Uganda

  

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smale, M., Byerlee, D., Jayne, T. (2013). Maize Revolutions in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Otsuka, K., Larson, D. (eds) An African Green Revolution. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5760-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics