Skip to main content

The Relation of the Planetary Boundary Layer Height to the Vertical Aerosol Distribution in Chemistry Transport Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXII

Abstract

Simulated meteorological fields, ground values of aerosol concentrations (PM2.5) and aerosol concentration profiles, all calculated within the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) for the year 2006 for Europe are used to investigate the relation of the height of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) to the modelled aerosol concentrations. It was found that in many cases simulated PBL heights match the observed values at Lindenberg, Germany, quite well at noon and under convective conditions. On the other hand, in winter and at night time, when the atmosphere is more frequently stably stratified, the modelled values underestimate the observed PBL height quite significantly. A strong relationship between the simulated PBL height and the aerosol concentrations at ground was found. While those models which showed good agreement with the observed PBL height typically underestimate PM2.5, too low PBL heights were connected with higher aerosol concentrations close to ground and therefore lower bias. Model biases in PBL height and in PM2.5 concentration at ground were found to be highly anti-correlated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Galmarini S, Rao ST (2011) The AQMEII two-continent regional Air Quality Model evaluation study: fueling ideas with unprecedented data. Atmos Environ 45(14):2464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Solazzo E, Bianconi R, Pirovano G, Matthias V and 29 co-authors (2012) Operational model evaluation for particulate matter in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII. Atmos Environ 53:75–92. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.045

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vautard R, Moran MD, Solazzo E, Gilliam RC, Matthias V, Bianconi R, Chemel C, Ferreira J, Geyer B, Hansen AB, Jericevic A, Prank M, Segers A, Silver JD, Werhahn J, Wolke R, Rao S, Galmarini S (2012) Evaluation of the meteorological forcing used for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) air quality simulations. Atmos Environ., 53:15–37. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.065

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

F. Beyrich from the German Weather Service, Meteorologisches Observatorium Lindenberg, is gratefully acknowledged for the observed PBL heights. We thank all AQMEII participants who delivered data for the European domain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Matthias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Questions and Answers

Questioner Name: Jordi Vila

Q: Would it be useful to extend the data treatment and classify it according to the PBL prototypes: convective, stable, morning transition and afternoon transition?

A: Yes, this would certainly be useful. Part of this classification is already done by looking at the different starting times of the radiosondes. However one could further classify the data set into stable, neutral and unstable cases. This would give more insight into the reasons why some models underestimate the PBL height even at noon. One problem with the current data set from Lindenberg is that it is too small to give a good statistics if additional separations are made. Therefore I will look into additional data sets from other locations.

Questioner Name: Golam Sarwar

Q: Published articles suggest air quality models have difficulty in predicting clouds accurately. This has influence on sulphate predictions. Any comments?

A: We used profiles of sulphate in PM2.5 to investigate the vertical distribution of atmospheric aerosols in AQMEII. We are well aware of the fact that sulphate production is influenced by clouds and other meteorological parameters like radiation. Nevertheless we believe it is the most suitable variable that is available in the AQMEII data set to compare vertical profiles of aerosol components. Besides sulphate only PM2.5 is stored in the data set and this variable is even more sensitive to variations in chemistry, emissions (e.g. fire emissions were not considered by all groups) and meteorological conditions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Matthias, V., Aulinger, A., Bieser, J., Quante, M. (2014). The Relation of the Planetary Boundary Layer Height to the Vertical Aerosol Distribution in Chemistry Transport Models. In: Steyn, D., Builtjes, P., Timmermans, R. (eds) Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXII. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5577-2_93

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics