Skip to main content

Effect of the Turbulence Parameterizations on the Simulation of Pollutant Dispersion with the RMS Modelling System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXII

Abstract

The effect of using in dispersion modeling different parameterizations for the wind velocity fluctuations standard deviations is investigated for low-wind conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Degrazia G, Anfossi D, Carvalho J, Mangia C, Tirabassi T, Campos Velho H (2000) Turbulence parameterisation for PBL dispersion models in all stability conditions. Atmos Environ 34:3575–3583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanna SR (1982) Applications in air pollution modelling. In: Nieuwstadt F, Van Dop H (eds) Atmospheric turbulence and air pollution modelling. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 275–310

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moraes OLL, Acevedo OC, Degrazia GA, Anfossi D, Da Silva R, Anabor V (2005) Surface layer turbulence parameters over a complex terrain. Atmos Environ 39:3103–3112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wyngaard JC, Coté OR (1971) The budgets of turbulent kinetic energy and temperature variance in the atmospheric surface layer. J Atmos Sci 28:190–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Trini Castelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Questions and Answers

Questioner Name: Jeff Weil

Q: (1) For the unstable case, have you looked at the number of independent eddies that pass your wind sensor over the averaging time? Since the large eddy scale ∼zi and the wind speed is U, the number of eddies that pass the sensor in the averaging time Tav is n ≅TavU/zi (e.g. see Briggs 1993 JAM). The lower the number, the greater is the uncertainty in the σu,v,w as your data seem to suggest.

(2) For the stable case, have you looked at the surface temperature in homogeneity as a source of horizontal wind fluctuations? For example, a velocity scale due to temperature fluctuations σθ could be given by vθ = (gLsσθ/θ)1/2, where Ls is the relevant length scale (TBD).

A: We appreciate the questions and related suggestions and we will take care of them in future research activity. However, our experience in low wind turbulence tells us that in such conditions there is not a clear distinction between unstable and stable conditions and that the mixing height zi is not a proper scaling parameter. A thorough analysis of this specific dataset confirmed that low-wind conditions are critical for the definition of the atmospheric stability, since the boundaries between stable and unstable stratification are less defined than for windy cases.

Questioner Name: Bertrand Carissimo

Q: If the measurement tower was close to the building you would not use the homogeneous terrain formula as you did. What do you think is the limit for using this formula?

A: Surely we can expect that in complex geometry the formula should be corrected to account for the presence of buildings and obstacles, for instance through morphometric parameters. We are investigating this aspect trying to estimate the possible limits of it. Up to now, a thorough analysis of the data showed that in our case the low-wind regime dominates in determining the flow dynamics and the stratification conditions with respect to the urban morphology. We found a good agreement between the observed and the predicted standard deviations. Moreover, the obstacles closest to the mast are at a distance of 70 m and about 4 m high. In the simulation presented here we are looking at the microscale effect on the dispersion using the observed data as input. It will be different when considering larger scales, for which the effects of the surrounding buildings can play a major role.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Castelli, S.T., Falabino, S., Tinarelli, G., Anfossi, D. (2014). Effect of the Turbulence Parameterizations on the Simulation of Pollutant Dispersion with the RMS Modelling System. In: Steyn, D., Builtjes, P., Timmermans, R. (eds) Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXII. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5577-2_89

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics