Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk and Responsibility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essentials of Risk Theory

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Philosophy ((BRIEFSPHILOSOPH))

Abstract

When a risk materializes, it is common to ask the question: who is responsible for the risk being taken? Despite this intimate connection between risk and responsibility, remarkably little has been written on the exact relation between the notions of risk and responsibility. This contribution sets out to explore the relation between risk and responsibility on basis of the somewhat dispersed literature on the topic and it sketches directions for future research. It deals with three more specific topics. First we explore the conceptual connections between risk and responsibility by discussing different conceptions of risk and responsibility and their relationships. Second, we discuss responsibility for risk, paying attention to four more specific activities with respect to risks: risk reduction, risk assessment, risk management, and risk communication. Finally, we explore the problem of many hands (PMH), that is, the problem of attributing responsibility when large numbers of people are involved in an activity. We argue that the PMH has especially become prominent today due to the increased collective nature of actions and due to the fact that our actions often do not involve direct harm but rather risks, that is, the possibility of harm. We illustrate the PMH for climate change and discuss three possible ways of dealing with it: (1) responsibility-as-virtue, (2) a procedure for distributing responsibility, and (3) institutional design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arendt H (1965) Eichmann in Jerusalem: a report on the banality of evil. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (ed) (2000) Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Asveld L, Roeser S (eds) (2009) The ethics of technological risk. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society; towards a new modernity. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin I (1958) Two concepts of liberty. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman J, Rehg W (1997) Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon R (1981) The logic of social action: an introduction to sociological analysis. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JA (1989) The policy implications of differing concepts of risk. Sci Technol Hum Values 14(4):380–399. doi:10.1177/016224398901400404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braham M, van Hees M (2010) An anatomy of moral responsibility, manuscript. Available at http://www.rug.nl/staff/martin.van.hees/MoralAnatomy.pdf

  • Caney S (2005) Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and climate change. Leiden J Int Law 18(4):747–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caney S (2010) Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Crit Rev Int Soc Polit Philos 13(1):203–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copp D (2007) The collective moral autonomy thesis. J Soc Philos 38(3):369–388. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00386.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covello VT, Merkhofer MW (1993) Risk assessment methods: approaches for assessing health and environmental risks. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello VT, McCallum DB, Pavlova MT, Task force on environmental cancer and heart and lung disease (U.S.) (1989) Effective risk communication: the role and responsibility of government and nongovernment organizations, vol 4, Contemporary issues in risk analysis. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranor CF (1993) Regulating toxic substances. A philosophy of science and the law, Environmental ethics and science policy series. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M (1998) Thinking like an engineer. Studies in the ethics of a profession. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M (2012) “Ain’t no one here but us social forces”: constructing the professional responsibility of engineers. Sci Eng Ethics 18:13–34. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9225-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorn N (2010) A Rawlsian approach to distribute responsibilities in networks. Sci Eng Ethics 16(2):221–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorn N (2011) Moral responsibility in R&D networks. A procedural approach to distributing responsibilities. Simon Stevin Series in the Philosophy of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M (1985) Risk acceptability according to the social sciences, vol 11, Social research perspectives: occasional reports on current topics. Russell Sage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas HE (2009) Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M, Wildavsky AB (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J (1998) Deliberative democracy. Cambridge studies in the theory of democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti M (2010) Risk and distributive justice: the case of regulating new technologies. Sci Eng Ethics 16(3):501–515. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9172-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer JM, Ravizza M (1998) Responsibility and control: a theory of moral responsibility. Cambridge studies in philosophy and law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt H (1969) Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. J Philos 66:829–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French PA (1984) Collective and corporate responsibility. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey J (2008) The ethics of climate change. Right and wrong in a warming world. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1999) Risk and responsibility. Modern Law Rev 62(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert M (1989) On social facts. International library of philosophy. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1990) Moral consciousness and communicative action. Studies in contemporary German social thought. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson SO (2008) Risk. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson SO (2009) Risk and safety in technology. In: Meijers A (ed) Handbook of the philosophy of science. Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences, vol 9. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1069–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris CE, Pritchard MS, Rabins MJ (2008) Engineering ethics. Concepts and cases, 4th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart HLA (1968) Punishment and responsibility: essays in the philosophy of law. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindriks F (2009) Corporate responsibility and judgement aggregation. Econ Philos 25:161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter TA (1997) Designing to codes and standards. In: Dieter GE, Lampman S (eds) ASM handbook, vol 20, Materials selection and design. pp 66–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse R (2000) On virtue ethics. Oxford Univesity Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • IEGMP (2000) Mobile phones and health (The Stewart report). Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones

    Google Scholar 

  • International Program on Chemical Safety (2004) IPCS risk assessment terminology, Harmonization project document, vol 1. World Health Organisation, Geneve

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BB (1999) Ethical issues in risk communication: continuing the discussion. Risk Anal 19(3):335–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BL (2003) Ethical obligations in a tragedy of the commons. Environ Values 12(3):271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungermann H (1996) Ethical dilemmas in risk communication. In: Messick M, Tenbrunsel AE (eds) Codes of conduct. Behavioral research into business ethics. Russell Sage, New York, pp 300–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis HD (1948) Collective responsibility. Philosophy 24(83):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin MW, Schinzinger R (2005) Ethics in engineering, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • May L (1996) The socially responsive self. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller S (2007) Against the collective moral autonomy thesis. J Soc Philos 38(3):389–409. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00387.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller S (2010) The moral foundations of social institutions: a philosophical study. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MG, Lave L (1990) Ethical considerations in risk communication practice and research. Risk Anal 10(3):355–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1983) Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • NihlĂ©n Fahlquist J (2006) Responsibility ascriptions and vision zero. Accid Anal Prev 38:1113–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NihlĂ©n Fahlquist J (2009) Moral responsibility for environmental problems—individual or institutional? J Agric Environ Ethics 22(2):109–124. doi:10.1007/s10806-008-9134-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSPE (2007) NSPE code of ethics for engineers. National Society of Professional Engineers, USA, http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html. Accessed 10 Sept 2010

  • Pettit P (2007) Responsibility incorporated. Ethics 117:171–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1999 [1971]) A theory of justice, Revised edn. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner S (1992) Cultural theory and risk analysis. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social theories of risk. Praeger, Westport, pp 83–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (1992) Concepts of risk: a classification. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social theories of risk. Praeger, Westport, pp 53–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser S (2006) The role of emotions in the moral acceptability of risk. Saf Sci 44:689–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeser S (2007) Ethical intuitions about risks. Saf Sci Monit 11(3):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolf L, Sundqvist G Sociology of risk. pp 1001–1028 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette KS (1991a) Reductionist approaches to risk. In: Mayo DG, Hollander RD (eds) Acceptable evidence; science and values in risk management. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 218–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette KS (1991b) Risk and rationality. Philosophical foundations for populist reform. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue H (1999) Global environment and international inequality. Int Aff 75(3):531–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong W (2005) It’s not my fault: global warming and individual moral obligations. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W, Howarth RB (eds) Perspectives on climate change science, economics, politics, ethics. Elsevier/JAI, Amsterdam, pp 285–307

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Feinberg HV (1996) Understanding risk. Informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DF (1980) Moral responsibility and public officials: the problem of many hands. Am Polit Sci Rev 74(4):905–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson PB, Dean W (1996) Competing conceptions of risk. Risk Environ Health Saf 7:361–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1992) Rio declaration on environment and development

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1998) Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Poel I (2011) The relation between forward-looking and backward-looking responsibility. In: Vincent N, Van de Poel I, Van den Hoven J (eds) Moral responsibility. Beyond free will and determinism. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Poel I, Royakkers L (2011) Ethics, technology and engineering. Wiley-Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Poel I, Van Gorp A (2006) The need for ethical reflection in engineering design the relevance of type of design and design hierarchy. Sci Technol Hum Values 31(3):333–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Poel I, Zwart SD (2010) Reflective equilibrium in R&D Networks. Sci Technol Hum Values 35(2):174–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hooft S (2006) Understanding virtue ethics. Acumen, Chesham

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace RJ (1994) Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer DL (ed) (1995) Institutional design. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams G (2008) Responsibility as a virtue. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 11(4):455–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff J (2006) Risk, fear, blame, shame and the regulation of public safety. Econ Philos 22(03):409–427. doi:10.1017/S0266267106001040

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Ibo van de Poel & Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist

  2. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

    Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist

Authors
  1. Ibo van de Poel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibo van de Poel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Philosophy, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2628 BX, Netherlands

    Sabine Roeser

  2. HumTec, RWTH Aachen, Theaterplatz 14, Aachen, 52062, Germany

    Rafaela Hillerbrand

  3. Arrheniusplan 4,, Uppsala, 750 07, Sweden

    Per Sandin

  4. Eindhoven, 5600 MB, Netherlands

    Martin Peterson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van de Poel, I., Nihlén Fahlquist, J. (2013). Risk and Responsibility. In: Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., Peterson, M. (eds) Essentials of Risk Theory. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5455-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation