Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Forage Legume Intercropping in Temperate Regions: Models and Ideotypes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Agriculture Reviews

Part of the book series: Sustainable Agriculture Reviews ((SARV,volume 11))

Abstract

This chapter shows that our models of intercropping do not increase the costs of sowing. The crude protein content in forage dry matter remains high, even with short growing seasons. The models fit easily into various cropping systems and do not require synthetic fertilisers or herbicide. Intercropping is one of the oldest agricultural practices worldwide. Intercropping is beneficial in many ways, encompassing better utilisation of soil resources such as water and nutrients, improved tolerance to abiotic and biotic stress such as low temperatures, drought, pests and diseases and environment-friendly services such as decreased demand for chemical weed control and mineral fertilisers. Despite its long tradition, intercropping offers constant challenges in examining diverse aspects of newly-designed crop associations. One of the most recent and thoroughly studied is intercropping annual temperate legumes with each other for forage production. We established four main principles for such intercropping: same time of sowing; similar growing habit; similar cutting time; and one component has good standing ability (supporting crop) and another is susceptible to lodging (supported crop). Here we review the basic agronomic performance of three main intercropping groups, namely (1) autumn- and spring-sown ‘tall’ cool season legumes; (2) autumn- and spring-sown ‘short’ cool season legumes; (3) early and late maturing warm-season annual forage legumes. Intercropping autumn-sown faba bean with autumn-sown common vetch had balanced total forage dry matter yield and Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) of 1.42. All combinations of autumn-sown and spring-sown intercrops of semi-leafless and normal-leafed peas resulted in LER values higher than 1. The intercrop of pigeon pea and lablab bean had LER values of 1.12 and 1.10. Majority of the intercrops are justified as economically reliable by Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abberton MT, Marshall AH, Humphreys MW, MacDuff JH, Collins RP, Marley CL (2008) Genetic improvement of forage species to reduce the environmental impact of temperate livestock grazing systems. Adv Agron 98:311–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adetiloye PO, Adekunle AA (1989) Concept of monetary equivalent ratio and its usefulness in the evaluation of intercropping advantages. Trop Agric 66:337–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Agegnehu G, Ghizaw A, Sinebo W (2006) Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. Eur J Agron 25:202–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen MK, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen ES (2004) Biomass production, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and inorganic N use in dual and tri-component annual intercrops. Plant Soil 266:273–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anil L, Park J, Phipps RH, Miller FA (1998) Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: review of the potential for growth and utilisation with particular reference to the UK. Grass Forage Sci 53:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedoussac L, Justes E (2010a) The efficiency of a durum wheat-winter pea intercrop to improve yield and wheat grain protein concentration depends on N availability during early growth. Plant Soil 330:19–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bedoussac L, Justes E (2010b) Dynamic analysis of competition and complementarity for light and N use to understand the yield and the protein content of a durum wheat–winter pea intercrop. Plant Soil 330:37–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biabani A, Hashemib M, Herbert SJ (2008) Agronomic performance of two intercropped soybean cultivars. Int J Plant Prod 2:215–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Braum SM, Helmke PA (1995) White lupin utilizes soil phosphorus that is unavailable to soybean. Plant Soil 176:95–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ćupina B, Erić P, Mihailović V, Krstić Đ, Mikić A (2006) Perennial forage crops establishment with fodder pea as companion crop. Ratar Povrt/Field Veg Crop Res 42:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćupina B, Mikić A, Krstić Đ (2009a) Field pea: a cover crop in establishing perennial legumes. Grain Legum 52:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćupina B, Mikić A, Mihailović V, Krstić Đ, Đurić B (2009b) Intercropping of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) with other grain legumes for forage production. Grain Legum 54:32

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćupina B, Krstić Đ, Mikić A, Erić P, Vučković S, Pejić B (2010a) Field pea companion crop management on red clover establishment and productivity. Turk J Agric For 34:275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćupina B, Krstić Đ, Antanasović S, Erić P, Pejić B, Mikić A, Mihailović V (2010b) Potential of the intercrops of normal-leafed and semi-leafless pea cultivars for forage production. Pisum Genet 42:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćupina B, Manojlović M, Krstić Đ, Čabilovski R, Mikić A, Ignjatović-Ćupina A, Erić P (2011a) Effect of winter cover crops on the dynamics of soil mineral nitrogen and yield and quality of Sudan grass [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Aust J Crop Sci 5:839–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćupina B, Mikić A, Krstić Đ, Antanasović S, Erić P, Ðorđević V, Perić V (2011b) Intercropping white lupin with other annual legumes for forage and grain production. Book of abstracts, 13th international lupin conference, Poznań, Poland, 6–10 June 2011, p 25

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćupina B, Mikić A, Krstić Đ, Antanasović S, Pejić B, Erić P, Ignjatović-Ćupina A (2011c) Mutual intercropping of spring annual legumes for grain production in the Balkans. Indian J Agric Sci 81:971–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćupina B, Mikić A, Stoddard FL, Krstić Đ, Justes E, Bedoussac L, Fustec J, Pejić B (2011d) Mutual legume intercropping for forage production in temperate regions. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Sustainable agriculture reviews 7: genetics, biofuels and local farming systems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 347–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Conaghan P, O’Kiely P, O’Mara FP (2010) Conservation characteristics of wilted perennial ryegrass silage made using biological or chemical additives. J Dairy Sci 93:628–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corre-Hellou G, Fustec J, Crozat Y (2006) Interspecific competition for soil N and its interaction with N2 fixation, leaf expansion and crop growth in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil 282:195–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cortés-Mora FA, Piva G, Jamont M, Fustec J (2010) Niche separation and nitrogen transfer in Brassica-legume intercrops. Ratar Povrt/Field Veg Crop Res 47:581–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Evidente A, Fernández-Aparicio M, Andolfi A, Rubiales D, Motta A (2007) Trigoxazonane, a monosubstituted trioxazonane from Trigonella foenum-graecum root exudate, inhibits Orobanche crenata seed germination. Phytochem 68:2487–2492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Aparicio M, Emeran AA, Rubiales D (2011) Inter-cropping faba bean with berseem, fenugreek or oat can contribute to broomrape management. Grain Legum 56:31

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankow-Lindberg BE, Brophy C, Collins RP, Conolly J (2009) Biodiversity effects on yield and unsown species invasion in a temperate forage ecosystem. Ann Bot 103:913–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fustec J, Lesuffleur F, Mahieu S, Cliquet JB (2010) N rhizodeposition of legumes. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:57–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh PK, Mohanty M, Bandyopadhyay KK, Painuli DK, Misra AK (2006a) Growth, competition, yield advantage and economics in soybean/pigeonpea intercropping system in semi-arid tropics of India: I. Effect of subsoiling. Field Crop Res 96:80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh PK, Mohanty M, Bandyopadhyay KK, Painuli DK, Misra AK (2006b) Growth, competition, yields advantage and economics in soybean/pigeonpea intercropping system in semi-arid tropics of India: II. Effect of nutrient management. Field Crop Res 96:90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiney E, Milbourne D, Mullins E, Barth S, Burke JI (2004) Plant biotechnology: global perspectives and Irish priorities. Summary of papers, agricultural research forum 2004, Tullamore, Ireland, 1–2 Mar 2004, pp 116–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jensen ES (2005) Facilitative root interactions in intercrops. Plant Soil 274:237–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jørnsgaard B, Kinane J, Jensen ES (2008) Grain legume – cereal intercropping: the practical application of diversity, competition and facilitation in arable and organic cropping systems. Renew Agric Food Syst 23:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Peoples MB, Jensen ES (2011) Faba bean in cropping systems. Grain Legum 56:32–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Huss-Danell K, Chaia E, Carlsson G (2007) N2 fixation and nitrogen allocation to above and below ground plant parts in red clover-grasslands. Plant Soil 299:215–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadžiulienė Ž, Šarūnaitė L, Deveikytė I (2011) Effect of pea and spring cereals intercropping on grain yield and crude protein content. Ratar Povrt/Field Veg Crop Res 48:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivisto JM (2002) Semi leafless pea: a cover crop for establishing lucerne or red clover. Ph.D. thesis, Royal Agricultural College & Coventry University, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Ran W, Zhang R, Sun S, Xu G (2009) Facilitated legume nodulation, phosphate uptake and nitrogen transfer by arbuscular inoculation in an upland rice and mung bean intercropping system. Plant Soil 315:285–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lovatt JA, Hayes R, Sanderson R, Duller S (2010) The contribution of hybrid ryegrass (Lolium x hybridum Hausskn) to dry matter yield in mixtures with perennial ryegrass. In: Huyghe C (ed) Sustainable use of genetic diversity in forage and turf breeding. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 223–226

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Malézieux E, Crozat Y, Dupraz C, Laurans M, Makowski D, Ozier-Lafontaine H (2009) Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29:43–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti M, Masoni A, Ercoli L, Arduini I (2009) Above- and below-ground competition between barley, wheat, lupin and vetch in a cereal and legume intercropping system. Grass Forage Sci 64:401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mela T (2003) Red clover grown in a mixture with grasses: yield, persistence and dynamics of quality characteristics. Agric Food Sci Finl 12:195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihailović V, Erić P, Mikić A (2004) Growing peas and vetches for forage in Serbia and Montenegro. Grassl Sci Eur 9:457–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikić A, Đorđević V, Perić V, Ćupina B, Mihailović V, Srebrić M, Krstić D (2010) Preliminary report on forage yields in mid- to late spring-sown annual legume intercrops. Biotechnol Anim Husb 26(Special issue 2):269–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikić A, Medović A, Ćupina B, Mihailović V, Ignjatović-Ćupina A, Ðorđević V, Kobiljski B (2011a) Paleolinguistics brings more light on the earliest history of the traditional Eurasian pulse crops. Nat Preced. doi:10.1038/npre.2011.5837.1

  • Mikić A, Mihailović V, Ćupina B, Kosev V, Warkentin T, McPhee K, Ambrose M, Hofer J, Ellis N (2011b) Genetic background and agronomic value of leaf types in pea (Pisum sativum). Ratar Povrt/Field Veg Crop Res 48:275–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir JP, Pitman WD, Foster JL (2011) Sustainable, low-input, warm-season, grass–legume grassland mixtures: mission (nearly) impossible? Grass Forage Sci 66:301–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngongoni NT, Mwale M, Mapiye C, Moyo MT, Hamudikuwanda H, Titterton T (2007) Evaluation of cereal-legume intercropped forages for smallholder dairy production in Zimbabwe. Livest Res Rural Dev 19:129

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyraud JL, Le Gall A, Lüscher A (2009) Potential food production from forage legume-based-systems in Europe: an overview. Ir J Agric Food Res 48:115–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy AK, Sikdar B, Rahman M, Rahman MA, Haque ME (2003) Lablab bean based intercropping system in northwest region of Bangladesh. Pak J Biol Sci 6:948–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RJ, Chung GH, Nelson RL (2007) Landmark research in legumes. Genome 50:525–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sobkowicz P (2006) Competition between triticale (Triticosecale Witt.) and field beans (Vicia faba var. minor L.) in additive intercrops. Plant Soil Environ 52(2):47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Strydhorst SM, King JR, Lopetinsky KJ, Harker KN (2008) Forage potential of intercropping barley with faba bean, lupin, or field pea. Agron J 100:182–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szumigalski A, Van Acker R (2005) Weed suppression and crop production in annual intercrops. Weed Sci 53:813–825

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer J, Van Noordwijk M, Anderson J, Ong C, Perfecto I (1998) Global change and multi-species ecosystems: concepts and issues. Agric Ecosyst Environ 67:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willey R (1979) Intercropping – its importance and research needs. 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstr 32:1–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research on mutual annual forage legume intercrops is supported by the projects TR-31016 and TR-31024 of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia and the FP7-supported project 168 SEELEGUMES within SEE-ERA.NET Plus programme of the European Union.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Maksima Gorkog 30, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia

    Aleksandar Mikić, Vojislav Mihailović, Vuk Đorđević, Ana Marjanović-Jeromela & Borislav Kobiljski

  2. Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field and Vegetable Crops, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia

    Branko Ćupina, Ðorđe Krstić & Svetlana Antanasović

  3. Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje, Slobodana Bajića 1, 11185, Belgrade, Serbia

    Vesna Perić & Mirjana Srebrić

Authors
  1. Aleksandar Mikić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Branko Ćupina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vojislav Mihailović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ðorđe Krstić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vuk Đorđević
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vesna Perić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mirjana Srebrić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Svetlana Antanasović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ana Marjanović-Jeromela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Borislav Kobiljski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksandar Mikić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. INRA-CMSE-PME, rue Sully 17, Dijon, 21000, France

    Eric Lichtfouse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mikić, A. et al. (2012). Forage Legume Intercropping in Temperate Regions: Models and Ideotypes. In: Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation