Abstract
This chapter presents an algorithm for automatically generating a prototype from multicolor karyotypes obtained via multi-spectral imaging of human chromosomes. The single representative prototype of the color karyotype that is generated represents the analytical integration of a group of karyotypes obtained via Multicolor Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (MFISH) method. Multicolor karyotyping is a 24-color MFISH method that allows simultaneous screening of the genome. It allows for the detection of a wide variety of anomalies in human chromosomes, including subtle and complex rearrangements. Although, multicolor karyotyping allows visual detection of gross anomalies, misclassified pixels make manual examination difficult. Additionally, in the absence of prior knowledge of the anomaly, interpretation of the karyotypes can be ambiguous. In this study we have developed an automated method for the generation of a single representative prototype of the color karyotype, which assists the screening of chromosomal aberrations by computational removal of non-physiological anomalies. We hypothesize that generation of a single representative prototype of the color karyotype from multiple karyotypes (k) for a given specimen can highlight all the aberrations, while minimizing misclassified pixels arising from inconsistencies in sample preparation, hybridization and imaging procedures. A three-tier approach is implemented to achieve the generation of the representative color karyotype from a set of multiple (>2) karyotypes. The first step involves the automated extraction of individual chromosomes from each karyotype in the set, followed by chromosome straightening and size normalization. In the second step, the extracted and normalized chromosomes belonging to each of the 24 color classes are automatically assigned to a particular group (1, 2, 3, etc.) based on the ploidy level (monoploid, diploid, triploid, etc.), respectively. For automated group assignment, Bayesian classification is utilized to determine the probability that a particular chromosome belongs to a specific group based on the similarity between the chromosomes within the group. Similarity is evaluated using two distance metrics: (1) two-dimensional (2D) histogram based descriptors, and (2) Eigen space representation based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Finally in the third step, we compute the prototype of the color karyotype by generating the representative chromosome for each group in the 24 color classes using pixel-based fusion. This approach allows us to generate the representative prototype color karyotype that reflects all anomalies for a given specimen, while rejecting non-physiological inconsistencies. Furthermore, automation not only reduces the workload, but also allows alleviation of subjectivity by providing a quantitative formulation based on statistical analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Tjio JH, Levan A (1956) The chromosome number of man. Hereditas 42(1–2):1–6
Bayani JM, Squire JA (2002) Applications of SKY in cancer cytogenetics. Cancer Investig 20(3):373–386
Carpenter NJ (2001) Molecular cytogenetics. Semin Pediatr Neurol 8(3):135–146
Castleman KR, Melnyk J, Frieden HJ, Persinger GW, Wall RJ (1976) Karyotype analysis by computer and its application to mutagenicity testing of environmental chemicals. Mutat Res 41(1):153–161
Lee C, Lemyre E, Miron PM, Morton CC (2001) Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization in clinical cytogenetic diagnostics. Curr Opin Pediatr 13(6):550–555
Lundsteen C, Lind AM, Granum E (1976) Visual classification of banded human chromosomes. I. Karyotyping compared with classification of isolated chromosomes. Ann Hum Genet 40(1):87–97
Swansbury J (2003) Introduction to the analysis of the human G-banded karyotype. Methods Mol Biol 220:259–269
Todd R, Donoff RB, Wong DT (2000) The chromosome: cytogenetic analysis and its clinical application. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58(9):1034–1039
Anderson R (2010) Multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH). Methods Mol Biol 659:83–97
Speicher MR, Ward DC (1996) The coloring of cytogenetics. Nat Med 2(9):1046–1048
Liehr T, Starke H, Weise A, Lehrer H, Claussen U (2004) Multicolor FISH probe sets and their applications. Histol Histopathol 19(1):229–237
Schrock E, du Manoir S, Veldman T, Schoell B, Wienberg J, Ferguson-Smith MA, Ning Y, Ledbetter DH, Bar-Am I, Soenksen D, Garini Y, Ried T (1996) Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science 273(5274):494–497
Speicher MR, Gwyn Ballard S, Ward DC (1996) Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Nat Genet 12(4):368–375
Odero MD, Carlson K, Calasanz MJ, Lahortiga I, Chinwalla V, Rowley JD (2001) Identification of new translocations involving ETV6 in hematologic malignancies by fluorescence in situ hybridization and spectral karyotyping. Genes Chromosom Cancer 31(2):134–142
Castleman KR, Eils R, Morrison L, Piper J, Saracoglu K, Schulze MA, Speicher MR (2000) Classification accuracy in multiple color fluorescence imaging microscopy. Cytometry 41(2):139–147
Garini Y, Gil A, Bar-Am I, Cabib D, Katzir N (1999) Signal to noise analysis of multiple color fluorescence imaging microscopy. Cytometry 35(3):214–226
Rens W, Yang F, O’Brien PC, Solanky N, Ferguson-Smith MA (2001) A classification efficiency test of spectral karyotyping and multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization: identification of chromosome homologies between homo sapiens and hylobates leucogenys. Genes Chromosom Cancer 31(1):65–74
Strefford JC, Lillington DM, Young BD, Oliver RT (2001) The use of multicolor fluorescence technologies in the characterization of prostate carcinoma cell lines: a comparison of multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization and spectral karyotyping data. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 124(2):112–121
Lee C, Gisselsson D, Jin C, Nordgren A, Ferguson DO, Blennow E, Fletcher JA, Morton CC (2001) Limitations of chromosome classification by multicolor karyotyping. Am J Hum Genet 68(4):1043–1047
Azofeifa J, Fauth C, Kraus J, Maierhofer C, Langer S, Bolzer A, Reichman J, Schuffenhauer S, Speicher MR (2000) An optimized probe set for the detection of small interchromosomal aberrations by use of 24-color FISH. Am J Hum Genet 66(5):1684–1688
Jalal SM, Law ME (1999) Utility of multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization in clinical cytogenetics. Genet Med 1(5):181–186
Knutsen T, Gobu V, Knaus R, Reid T, Sirotkin K (2002) The SKY/CGH database for spectral karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridization data. In: McEntyre J, Ostell J (eds) The NCBI handbook national center for biotechnology information, USA, Bethesda, MD
SD de Carvalho CR B (2003) A software tool to straighten curved chromosome images. Chromosom Res 11(1):83–88
Javan-Roshtkhari M, Setarehdan SK (2007) A new approach to automatic classification of the curved chromosomes. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on image and signal processing and analysis, vol 1, pp 19–24
Choi HI, Choi SW, Moon HP (1997) Mathematical theory of medial axis transform. Pac J Math 181(1):57–88
Merchant FA, Good KN, Choi H, Castleman KR (2002) Automated detection of chromosomal rearrangements in multicolor fluorescence in-situ hybridization images. In: Proceedings of the second joint IEEE EMBS/BMES conference, vol 2, pp 1074–1075
Beran R (1977) Minimum Hellinger distance estimates for parametric models. Ann Stat 5(3):445–463
Sampat MP, Bovik AC, Aggarwal JK, Castleman KR (2005) Supervised parametric and non-parametric classification of chromosome images. Pattern Recognit 38(8):1209–1223
M-FISH chromosome imaging database (2012). http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/mfish.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wu, X., Shah, S., Merchant, F. (2013). Automated Prototype Generation for Multi-color Karyotyping. In: Celebi, M., Schaefer, G. (eds) Color Medical Image Analysis. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5389-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5389-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5388-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5389-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)