Abstract
Adaptive management is as much as social endeavor as a scientific or technical one. Drawing on our work as social scientists, and in particular on our evaluations of the Adaptive Management areas in the Pacific Northwest of the USA, and the Heartlands project in southeastern Australia, we suggest that watershed-scale adaptive management must be recognized as a radical departure from established ways of managing natural resources if it is to achieve its promise. Successful implementation will require new ways of thinking about management, new organizational structures and new implementation processes and tools. Adaptive management encourages scrutiny of prevailing social and organizational norms and this is unlikely to occur without a change in the culture of natural resource management and research. Planners and managers require educational, administrative, and political support as they seek to understand and implement adaptive management. Learning and reflection must be valued and rewarded, and fora established where learning through adaptive management can be shared and explored. The creation of new institutions, including educational curricula, organizational policies and practices, and professional norms and beliefs, will require support from within bureaucracies and from politicians. For adaptive management to be effective researchers and managers alike must work together at the watershed-scale to bridge the gaps between theory and practice, and between social and technical understandings of watersheds and the people who occupy and use them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan C (2004) Improving the outcomes of adaptive management at the regional scale. PhD thesis, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales
Allan C (2009) Reviewing adaptive management through a wicked lens. In: Lane M, Robinson C (eds) Contested country. CSIRO Publishing, Brisbane
Allan C, Curtis A (2003) Regional scale adaptive management: lessons from the North East Salinity Strategy. Austr J Environ Manag 10:76–84
Allan C, Curtis A (2005) Nipped in the bud: why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environ Manag 36:414–425
Allan C, Stankey GH (eds) (2009) Adaptive environmental management: a practitioner’s guide. Springer, Amsterdam
Allan C, Curtis A, Stankey G, Shindler B (2008) Adaptive management and watersheds: a social science perspective. J Am Water Resour Assoc 44:166–174
Allen W, Bosch O, Kilvington M, Oliver J, Gilbert M (2001) Benefits of collaborative learning for environmental management: applying the integrated systems for knowledge management approach to support animal pest control. Environ Manag 27:215–223
Blomquist W, Shlager E (2005) Political pitfalls of integrated watershed management. Soc Nat Resour 18:101–117
Commonwealth of Australia (2003) Agreement between the Commonwealth of Australia and New South Wales, 2003. http://www.napswq.gov.au/downloads/pdf/nsw-bilateral.pdf. Accessed Jan 2004
Commonwealth of Australia (2008) Australia’s State of the forests report 2008. http://adl.brs.gov.au/forestsaustralia/publications/execsummary.html. Accessed Jan 2009
Cook TD, Shadish WR (1986) Program evaluation: the worldly science. Annu Rev Psychol 37:193–232
CSIRO Heartlands Core Group (2000) Draft heartlands five year plan for 2001–2005: CSIRO/MDBC
Curtis A, Lockwood M (2000) Landcare and catchment management in Australia: lessons for state-sponsored community participation [review]. Soc Nat Resour 13:61–73
Curtis A, Shindler B, Wright A (2002) Sustaining local watershed initiatives: lessons from Landcare and Watershed Councils. J Am Water Resour Assoc 38:1207–1216
Ewing S (1999) Landcare and community-led watershed management in Victoria, Australia. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35:663–673
Grint K (2005) Problems, problems, problems: the social construction of ‘leadership’. Hum Relat 58:1467–1494
Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Gunderson L (1999) Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management – antidotes for spurious certitude? Conserv Ecol Online 3(1). http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art7
Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (1995) Barriers & bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York
Herrick C, Sarewitz D (2000) Ex post evaluation: a more effective role for scientific assessments in environmental policy. Sci Technol Hum Value 25:309–332
Hillman TJ, Koehn JD, Mitchell D, Thompson D, Sobels JD, Woodside D (2000) The Murrumbidgee: assessing the “health” of a working river. Irrigated Agribusiness Taskforce and Department of Land and Water Conservation, Canberra
Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive environmental management and assessment. Wiley, Chichester
Holling CS (1995) What barriers? what bridges? In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (eds) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York
Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10:328–337
Howe GT, Shindler B, Cashore B, Hansen E, Lach D, Armstrong W (2005) Public influences on plantation forestry. J For 103:90–94
Ison R, Watson D (2007) Illuminating the possibilities for social learning in the management of Scotland’s water. Ecol Soc 12:1–21
Jacobson SK, Morris JK, Sanders JS, Wiley EN, Brooks M, Bennetts RE et al (2006) Understanding barriers to implementation of an adaptive land management program. Conserv Biol 20:1516–1527
Kapoor I (2001) Towards participatory environmental management? J Environ Manag 63:269–279
Kruger L (2001) What is essential is invisible to the eye: understanding the role of place and social learning in achieving sustainable landscapes. In: Sheppard SRJ, Harshaw HW (eds) Forest and landscapes: linking ecology, sustainability and aesthetics. CABI Publishing, Wallingford
Lee KN (1993) Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press, Washington, DC
Lee KN (1999) Appraising adaptive management. Conserv Ecol online 3(2). (http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art3)
Miller A (1999) Environmental problem solving: psychosocial barriers to adaptive change. Springer, New York
NSW Department of Primary Industries (2008) Forests NSW seeing report 2007–2008. Forests NSW, Sydney
O’Neill KM (2005) Can watershed management unite town and country? Soc Nat Resour 18:241–253
Poncelet EC (2004) Partnering for the environment: multistakeholder collaboration in a changing world. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Oxford
Rahnema M (1997) Participation. In: Sachs W (ed) The development dictionary: a guide to knowledge as power. Orient Longman, Hyderabad
Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169
Roe E (1996) Why ecosystem management can’t work without social science: an example from the Californian Northern Spotted Owl controversy. Environ Manag 20:667–674
Roling NG, Jiggins J, Geisler CC, Schelhas J, Wollenberg E (2001) Agents in adaptive collaborative management: The logic of collective cognition. In: Buck LE (ed) Biological diversity: balancing interests through adaptive collaborative management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 145–170
Rossi P, Freeman H (1993) Evaluation: a systematic approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Schusler TM, Decker DJ, Pfeffer MJ (2003) Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 16:309–326
Shindler B (2000) Landscape-level management: it’s all about context. J For 98:10–14
Shindler B, Aldred-Cheek K, Stankey GH (1999) Monitoring and evaluating citizen-agency interactions: a framework developed for adaptive management. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-452. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland
Shindler B, Brunson M, Stankey GH (2002) Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: a problem analysis. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-537. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland
Shindler BA, Beckley TM, Finley C (eds) (2003) Two paths through the forest: the sustainability challenge in Canada and the United states. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
Slovic P, Finucane M, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24:311–322
Smith GR (1997) Making decisions in a complex and dynamic world. In: Kohm KA, Franklin JF (eds) Creating a forestry for the 21st century: the science of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, DC
Spencer LJ (1989). Winning through Participation. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company
Stankey GH, Shindler B (1997a) Adaptive management areas: achieving the promise, avoiding the peril. General Technical Report. PNW-GTR-654. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland
Stankey GH, Shindler B (1997b) Adaptive management areas: achieving the promise avoiding the Peril. United States Department of Agriculture Forests Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland
Stankey GH, Bormann B, Ryan C, Shindler B, Sturtevant V, Clark R, Philpot C (2003) Adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan: rhetoric and reality. J For 101:40–46
Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bormann BT (eds) (2006a) Learning to manage a complex ecosystem: adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan. Research Paper PNW-RP-567. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland
Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bormann BT (2006b) Learning to manage a complex ecosystem: adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Portland
Swanson LE (2001) Rural policy and direct local participation: democracy, inclusiveness, collective agency, and locality based policy. Rural Sociol 1:1–2
The Heinz Center (2002) The state of the nation’s ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Thrower J (2006) Adaptive management and NEPA: how a nonequilibrium view of ecosystems mandates flexible regulation. Ecol Law Q 33:871–895
Walters C (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. Macmillan, New York
Walters CJ, Holling CS (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–2068
Weiss CH (1997) How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway? Eval Rev 21:501–524
Wildavsky A, Dake K (1990) Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why? Dædalus 19:41–60
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the contribution made by George Stankey to the American Water Resources Association Journal paper on which this chapter is based.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allan, C., Curtis, A., Shindler, B. (2012). Watershed-Scale Adaptive Management: A Social Science Perspective. In: Stanturf, J., Lamb, D., Madsen, P. (eds) Forest Landscape Restoration. World Forests, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5326-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5326-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5325-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5326-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)