Skip to main content

Watershed-Scale Adaptive Management: A Social Science Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Forest Landscape Restoration

Part of the book series: World Forests ((WFSE,volume 15))

  • 1955 Accesses

Abstract

Adaptive management is as much as social endeavor as a scientific or technical one. Drawing on our work as social scientists, and in particular on our evaluations of the Adaptive Management areas in the Pacific Northwest of the USA, and the Heartlands project in southeastern Australia, we suggest that watershed-scale adaptive management must be recognized as a radical departure from established ways of managing natural resources if it is to achieve its promise. Successful implementation will require new ways of thinking about management, new organizational structures and new implementation processes and tools. Adaptive management encourages scrutiny of prevailing social and organizational norms and this is unlikely to occur without a change in the culture of natural resource management and research. Planners and managers require educational, administrative, and political support as they seek to understand and implement adaptive management. Learning and reflection must be valued and rewarded, and fora established where learning through adaptive management can be shared and explored. The creation of new institutions, including educational curricula, organizational policies and practices, and professional norms and beliefs, will require support from within bureaucracies and from politicians. For adaptive management to be effective researchers and managers alike must work together at the watershed-scale to bridge the gaps between theory and practice, and between social and technical understandings of watersheds and the people who occupy and use them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan C (2004) Improving the outcomes of adaptive management at the regional scale. PhD thesis, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan C (2009) Reviewing adaptive management through a wicked lens. In: Lane M, Robinson C (eds) Contested country. CSIRO Publishing, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan C, Curtis A (2003) Regional scale adaptive management: lessons from the North East Salinity Strategy. Austr J Environ Manag 10:76–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan C, Curtis A (2005) Nipped in the bud: why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environ Manag 36:414–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan C, Stankey GH (eds) (2009) Adaptive environmental management: a practitioner’s guide. Springer, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan C, Curtis A, Stankey G, Shindler B (2008) Adaptive management and watersheds: a social science perspective. J Am Water Resour Assoc 44:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen W, Bosch O, Kilvington M, Oliver J, Gilbert M (2001) Benefits of collaborative learning for environmental management: applying the integrated systems for knowledge management approach to support animal pest control. Environ Manag 27:215–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist W, Shlager E (2005) Political pitfalls of integrated watershed management. Soc Nat Resour 18:101–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (2003) Agreement between the Commonwealth of Australia and New South Wales, 2003. http://www.napswq.gov.au/downloads/pdf/nsw-bilateral.pdf. Accessed Jan 2004

  • Commonwealth of Australia (2008) Australia’s State of the forests report 2008. http://adl.brs.gov.au/forestsaustralia/publications/execsummary.html. Accessed Jan 2009

  • Cook TD, Shadish WR (1986) Program evaluation: the worldly science. Annu Rev Psychol 37:193–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO Heartlands Core Group (2000) Draft heartlands five year plan for 2001–2005: CSIRO/MDBC

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis A, Lockwood M (2000) Landcare and catchment management in Australia: lessons for state-sponsored community participation [review]. Soc Nat Resour 13:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis A, Shindler B, Wright A (2002) Sustaining local watershed initiatives: lessons from Landcare and Watershed Councils. J Am Water Resour Assoc 38:1207–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing S (1999) Landcare and community-led watershed management in Victoria, Australia. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35:663–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grint K (2005) Problems, problems, problems: the social construction of ‘leadership’. Hum Relat 58:1467–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L (1999) Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management – antidotes for spurious certitude? Conserv Ecol Online 3(1). http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art7

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (1995) Barriers & bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick C, Sarewitz D (2000) Ex post evaluation: a more effective role for scientific assessments in environmental policy. Sci Technol Hum Value 25:309–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman TJ, Koehn JD, Mitchell D, Thompson D, Sobels JD, Woodside D (2000) The Murrumbidgee: assessing the “health” of a working river. Irrigated Agribusiness Taskforce and Department of Land and Water Conservation, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive environmental management and assessment. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1995) What barriers? what bridges? In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (eds) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10:328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe GT, Shindler B, Cashore B, Hansen E, Lach D, Armstrong W (2005) Public influences on plantation forestry. J For 103:90–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison R, Watson D (2007) Illuminating the possibilities for social learning in the management of Scotland’s water. Ecol Soc 12:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson SK, Morris JK, Sanders JS, Wiley EN, Brooks M, Bennetts RE et al (2006) Understanding barriers to implementation of an adaptive land management program. Conserv Biol 20:1516–1527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor I (2001) Towards participatory environmental management? J Environ Manag 63:269–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger L (2001) What is essential is invisible to the eye: understanding the role of place and social learning in achieving sustainable landscapes. In: Sheppard SRJ, Harshaw HW (eds) Forest and landscapes: linking ecology, sustainability and aesthetics. CABI Publishing, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KN (1993) Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KN (1999) Appraising adaptive management. Conserv Ecol online 3(2). (http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art3)

  • Miller A (1999) Environmental problem solving: psychosocial barriers to adaptive change. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Department of Primary Industries (2008) Forests NSW seeing report 2007–2008. Forests NSW, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill KM (2005) Can watershed management unite town and country? Soc Nat Resour 18:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poncelet EC (2004) Partnering for the environment: multistakeholder collaboration in a changing world. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahnema M (1997) Participation. In: Sachs W (ed) The development dictionary: a guide to knowledge as power. Orient Longman, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe E (1996) Why ecosystem management can’t work without social science: an example from the Californian Northern Spotted Owl controversy. Environ Manag 20:667–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roling NG, Jiggins J, Geisler CC, Schelhas J, Wollenberg E (2001) Agents in adaptive collaborative management: The logic of collective cognition. In: Buck LE (ed) Biological diversity: balancing interests through adaptive collaborative management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 145–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi P, Freeman H (1993) Evaluation: a systematic approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Schusler TM, Decker DJ, Pfeffer MJ (2003) Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 16:309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shindler B (2000) Landscape-level management: it’s all about context. J For 98:10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler B, Aldred-Cheek K, Stankey GH (1999) Monitoring and evaluating citizen-agency interactions: a framework developed for adaptive management. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-452. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler B, Brunson M, Stankey GH (2002) Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: a problem analysis. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-537. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler BA, Beckley TM, Finley C (eds) (2003) Two paths through the forest: the sustainability challenge in Canada and the United states. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P, Finucane M, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24:311–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GR (1997) Making decisions in a complex and dynamic world. In: Kohm KA, Franklin JF (eds) Creating a forestry for the 21st century: the science of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer LJ (1989). Winning through Participation. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey GH, Shindler B (1997a) Adaptive management areas: achieving the promise, avoiding the peril. General Technical Report. PNW-GTR-654. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey GH, Shindler B (1997b) Adaptive management areas: achieving the promise avoiding the Peril. United States Department of Agriculture Forests Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey GH, Bormann B, Ryan C, Shindler B, Sturtevant V, Clark R, Philpot C (2003) Adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan: rhetoric and reality. J For 101:40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bormann BT (eds) (2006a) Learning to manage a complex ecosystem: adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan. Research Paper PNW-RP-567. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bormann BT (2006b) Learning to manage a complex ecosystem: adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson LE (2001) Rural policy and direct local participation: democracy, inclusiveness, collective agency, and locality based policy. Rural Sociol 1:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • The Heinz Center (2002) The state of the nation’s ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrower J (2006) Adaptive management and NEPA: how a nonequilibrium view of ecosystems mandates flexible regulation. Ecol Law Q 33:871–895

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters C (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ, Holling CS (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–2068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss CH (1997) How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway? Eval Rev 21:501–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky A, Dake K (1990) Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why? Dædalus 19:41–60

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the contribution made by George Stankey to the American Water Resources Association Journal paper on which this chapter is based.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Allan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Allan, C., Curtis, A., Shindler, B. (2012). Watershed-Scale Adaptive Management: A Social Science Perspective. In: Stanturf, J., Lamb, D., Madsen, P. (eds) Forest Landscape Restoration. World Forests, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5326-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics