Skip to main content

Symbol Communication Systems Integrate Implicit Information in Coordination Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (III)

Abstract

In order to study the formation of communication systems through interactions, we conducted an experiment in which pairs of participants attempted to complete a coordination task through an exchange of messages composed of a set of abstract figures. At the beginning of the interaction, there was no shared rule for the meanings and usage of the figures as symbols. We observed that the participants completed the coordination task by forming communication systems. We suggested that communication systems can be developed effectively if participants have implicit behavioral tendencies, such as using small number of symbols, meeting at a usual place, and smooth turn taking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Each laptop computer exchanged information through a server, using a web browser (Firefox). The server–client system was a web application with SQL database and PHP.

  2. 2.

    Pair 5 was excluded for failure in the test session because a player of the pair unilaterally changed the rules from the trial session.

  3. 3.

    For the distribution of symbol use, E = 1 ∕ 6, N = 6. For the distribution of destination rooms, E = 1 ∕ 4, N = 4.

References

  1. J. Barwise and J. Perry, Situations and attitudes, MIT Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Tomasello, The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Galantucci, An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science. A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29(5): 737–767, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Galantucci, Experimental semiotics: A new approach for studying communication as a form of joint action. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2): 393–410, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Scott-Phillips and S. Kirby, Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(9): 411–417, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “The study on the neural dynamics for understanding communication in terms of complex hetero systems (No.4103)” (21120011) of The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeshi Konno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Konno, T., Morita, J., Hashimoto, T. (2013). Symbol Communication Systems Integrate Implicit Information in Coordination Tasks. In: Yamaguchi, Y. (eds) Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (III). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4792-0_61

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics