Skip to main content

Brain Research on Morality and Cognition

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Neuroethics

Abstract

The tools of neuroscience have increasingly been employed to address questions long considered the realm of philosophers, including questions of moral sentiment, choice, cognition, and action. This research seeks to identify the structures within the brain that function in and are the basis of human morality, to improve our understanding, for example, of the role of emotion in moral decision-making, or the moral failings of psychopaths. If successful, such research might not only allow philosophers to refine their theories based on scientific facts but also might inform social policy.

While research on morality comes from a range of disciplines, including psychology, economics, and the social sciences, this chapter will focus on the subset of this research that uses the tools of neuroscience (primarily fMRI) and is explicit about testing hypotheses related to moral sentiment, choice, cognition, and action in humans. We will focus our attention here not only because the technology and methods used in this research, and their strengths and weaknesses, are unique but also because this research has proven fascinating to the general public and policy-makers, which substantially broadens the impact that this research may have.

Ultimately, while the marriage of neuroscience and philosophy has tremendous potential to advance our understanding of ourselves as moral beings, we must be careful to limit both our scientific and philosophical conclusions to what the research can reasonably tell us, based on the limits both of the technology and of our ability to integrate centuries of philosophical thought into research design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barber, A. D., & Carter, C. S. (2005). Cognitive control involved in overcoming prepotent response tendencies and switching between tasks. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 899–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, B., Mancini, F., Macaluso, E., Caltagirone, C., & Bozzali, M. (2013). Abnormal processing of deontological guilt in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Brain Structure and Function, May 17 [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. J. R. (1995). A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath. Cognition, 57, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. J. R. (2007). The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 387–392 (Regul Ed).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, F., Tao, R., Liu, L., Perfetti, C. A., & Booth, J. R. (2013). High proficiency in a second language is characterized by greater involvement of the first language network: Evidence from Chinese learners of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1649–1663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Ladavas, E., & Pellegrino, G. D. (2007). Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, F., Murray, D., Gordon-McKeon, S., Wharton, S., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Judgment before principle: Engagement of the frontoparietal control network in condemning harms of omission. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 888–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error. New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonville, L., Lao-Kaim, N. P., Giampietro, V., Van den Eynde, F., Davies, H., Lounes, N., Andrew, C., Dalton, J., Simmons, A., Williams, S. C. R., Baron-Cohen, S., & Tchanturia, K. (2013). Evaluation of enhanced attention to local detail in anorexia nervosa using the embedded figures test; an fMRI study. PLoS One, 8(5), e63964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, C. M., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2009). The functional brain architecture of human morality. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 678–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, A. L., Raine, A., & Schug, R. A. (2009). The neural correlates of moral decision-making in psychopathy. Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 5–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. (2007a). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 322–323 (Regul Ed).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. (2007b). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology (Vol. 3). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., & Paxton, J. M. (2009). Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 12506–12511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. (2012). The antisocial brain: Psychopathy matters, a structural MRI investigation of antisocial male violent offenders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69, 962–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rationalist tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harenski, C. L., Harenski, K. A., Shane, M. S., & Kiehl, K. A. (2010). Aberrant neural processing of moral violations in criminal psychopaths. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 863–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. (2006). Moral minds. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314, 829–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature, 446, 908–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., & Oliveira-Souza, R. (2007a). Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 319–321 (Regul Ed).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., & de Oliveira-Souza, R. (2007b). Response to greene: Moral sentiments and reason: Friends or foes? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 323–324 (Regul Ed).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., & Schulkin, J. (2009). Social attachment and aversion in human moral cognition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 456–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., Eslinger, P. J., & Oliveira-Souza, R. (2001). Frontopolar and anterior temporal cortex activation in a moral judgment task: Preliminary functional MRI results in normal subjects. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 59, 657–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Bramati, I. E., & Grafman, J. (2002a). Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments. NeuroImage, 16, 696–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Eslinger, P. J., Bramati, I. E., Mourão-Miranda, J., Andreiuolo, P. A., & Pessoa, L. (2002b). The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 2730–2736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005a). Opinion: The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 799–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Moll, F. T., Ignácio, F. A., Bramati, I. E., Caparelli-Dáquer, E. M., & Eslinger, P. J. (2005b). The moral affiliations of disgust: A functional MRI study. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., Krueger, F., Zahn, R., Pardini, M., de Oliveira-Souza, R., & Grafman, J. (2006). Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 15623–15628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohyama, M., Senda, M., Kitamura, S., Ishii, K., Mishina, M., & Terashi, A. (1996). Role of the nondominant hemisphere and undamaged area during word repetition in poststroke aphasics. A PET activation study. Stroke, 27, 897–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63 (Regul Ed).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A. (2007). Region of interest analysis for fMRI. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A. (2011). Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: From reverse inference to large-scale decoding. Neuron, 72, 692–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A., Kittur, A., Kalar, D., Miller, E., Seppa, C., Gil, Y., Parker, D. S., Sabb, F. W., & Bilder, R. M. (2011). The cognitive atlas: Toward a knowledge foundation for cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 5, 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A., & Yang, Y. (2006). Neural foundations to moral reasoning and antisocial behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, A., Habedank, B., Herholz, K., Kessler, J., Winhuisen, L., Haupt, W. F., & Heiss, W. D. (2006). From the left to the right: How the brain compensates progressive loss of language function. Brain and Language, 98(1), 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17, 476–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S., Habel, U., Amunts, K., & Schneider, F. (2008). Structural brain abnormalities in psychopaths – A review. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26, 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2008). The neural basis of belief encoding and integration in moral judgment. NeuroImage, 40, 1912–1920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2011). Moral universals and individual differences. Emotion Review, 3, 323–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zündorf, I. C., Lewald, J., & Karnath, H. O. (2013). Neural correlates of sound localization in complex acoustic environments. PLoS One, 8(5), e64259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra J. H. Mathews .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mathews, D.J.H., Bok, H. (2015). Brain Research on Morality and Cognition. In: Clausen, J., Levy, N. (eds) Handbook of Neuroethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_133

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_133

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4706-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4707-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics