Abstract
The tools of neuroscience have increasingly been employed to address questions long considered the realm of philosophers, including questions of moral sentiment, choice, cognition, and action. This research seeks to identify the structures within the brain that function in and are the basis of human morality, to improve our understanding, for example, of the role of emotion in moral decision-making, or the moral failings of psychopaths. If successful, such research might not only allow philosophers to refine their theories based on scientific facts but also might inform social policy.
While research on morality comes from a range of disciplines, including psychology, economics, and the social sciences, this chapter will focus on the subset of this research that uses the tools of neuroscience (primarily fMRI) and is explicit about testing hypotheses related to moral sentiment, choice, cognition, and action in humans. We will focus our attention here not only because the technology and methods used in this research, and their strengths and weaknesses, are unique but also because this research has proven fascinating to the general public and policy-makers, which substantially broadens the impact that this research may have.
Ultimately, while the marriage of neuroscience and philosophy has tremendous potential to advance our understanding of ourselves as moral beings, we must be careful to limit both our scientific and philosophical conclusions to what the research can reasonably tell us, based on the limits both of the technology and of our ability to integrate centuries of philosophical thought into research design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barber, A. D., & Carter, C. S. (2005). Cognitive control involved in overcoming prepotent response tendencies and switching between tasks. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 899–912.
Basile, B., Mancini, F., Macaluso, E., Caltagirone, C., & Bozzali, M. (2013). Abnormal processing of deontological guilt in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Brain Structure and Function, May 17 [Epub ahead of print].
Blair, R. J. R. (1995). A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath. Cognition, 57, 1–29.
Blair, R. J. R. (2007). The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 387–392 (Regul Ed).
Cao, F., Tao, R., Liu, L., Perfetti, C. A., & Booth, J. R. (2013). High proficiency in a second language is characterized by greater involvement of the first language network: Evidence from Chinese learners of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1649–1663.
Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Ladavas, E., & Pellegrino, G. D. (2007). Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 84–92.
Cushman, F., Murray, D., Gordon-McKeon, S., Wharton, S., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Judgment before principle: Engagement of the frontoparietal control network in condemning harms of omission. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 888–895.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error. New York: Putnam.
Fonville, L., Lao-Kaim, N. P., Giampietro, V., Van den Eynde, F., Davies, H., Lounes, N., Andrew, C., Dalton, J., Simmons, A., Williams, S. C. R., Baron-Cohen, S., & Tchanturia, K. (2013). Evaluation of enhanced attention to local detail in anorexia nervosa using the embedded figures test; an fMRI study. PLoS One, 8(5), e63964.
Funk, C. M., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2009). The functional brain architecture of human morality. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 678–681.
Glenn, A. L., Raine, A., & Schug, R. A. (2009). The neural correlates of moral decision-making in psychopathy. Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 5–6.
Greene, J. D. (2007a). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 322–323 (Regul Ed).
Greene, J. D. (2007b). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology (Vol. 3). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Greene, J. D., & Paxton, J. M. (2009). Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 12506–12511.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400.
Gregory, S. (2012). The antisocial brain: Psychopathy matters, a structural MRI investigation of antisocial male violent offenders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69, 962–972.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rationalist tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
Harenski, C. L., Harenski, K. A., Shane, M. S., & Kiehl, K. A. (2010). Aberrant neural processing of moral violations in criminal psychopaths. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 863–874.
Hauser, M. (2006). Moral minds. New York: HarperCollins.
Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314, 829–832.
Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature, 446, 908–911.
Moll, J., & Oliveira-Souza, R. (2007a). Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 319–321 (Regul Ed).
Moll, J., & de Oliveira-Souza, R. (2007b). Response to greene: Moral sentiments and reason: Friends or foes? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 323–324 (Regul Ed).
Moll, J., & Schulkin, J. (2009). Social attachment and aversion in human moral cognition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 456–465.
Moll, J., Eslinger, P. J., & Oliveira-Souza, R. (2001). Frontopolar and anterior temporal cortex activation in a moral judgment task: Preliminary functional MRI results in normal subjects. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 59, 657–664.
Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Bramati, I. E., & Grafman, J. (2002a). Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments. NeuroImage, 16, 696–703.
Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Eslinger, P. J., Bramati, I. E., Mourão-Miranda, J., Andreiuolo, P. A., & Pessoa, L. (2002b). The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 2730–2736.
Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005a). Opinion: The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 799–809.
Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Moll, F. T., Ignácio, F. A., Bramati, I. E., Caparelli-Dáquer, E. M., & Eslinger, P. J. (2005b). The moral affiliations of disgust: A functional MRI study. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 68–78.
Moll, J., Krueger, F., Zahn, R., Pardini, M., de Oliveira-Souza, R., & Grafman, J. (2006). Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 15623–15628.
Ohyama, M., Senda, M., Kitamura, S., Ishii, K., Mishina, M., & Terashi, A. (1996). Role of the nondominant hemisphere and undamaged area during word repetition in poststroke aphasics. A PET activation study. Stroke, 27, 897–903.
Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63 (Regul Ed).
Poldrack, R. A. (2007). Region of interest analysis for fMRI. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 67–70.
Poldrack, R. A. (2011). Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: From reverse inference to large-scale decoding. Neuron, 72, 692–697.
Poldrack, R. A., Kittur, A., Kalar, D., Miller, E., Seppa, C., Gil, Y., Parker, D. S., Sabb, F. W., & Bilder, R. M. (2011). The cognitive atlas: Toward a knowledge foundation for cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 5, 17.
Raine, A., & Yang, Y. (2006). Neural foundations to moral reasoning and antisocial behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 203–213.
Thiel, A., Habedank, B., Herholz, K., Kessler, J., Winhuisen, L., Haupt, W. F., & Heiss, W. D. (2006). From the left to the right: How the brain compensates progressive loss of language function. Brain and Language, 98(1), 57–65.
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17, 476–477.
Weber, S., Habel, U., Amunts, K., & Schneider, F. (2008). Structural brain abnormalities in psychopaths – A review. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26, 7–28.
Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2008). The neural basis of belief encoding and integration in moral judgment. NeuroImage, 40, 1912–1920.
Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2011). Moral universals and individual differences. Emotion Review, 3, 323–324.
Zündorf, I. C., Lewald, J., & Karnath, H. O. (2013). Neural correlates of sound localization in complex acoustic environments. PLoS One, 8(5), e64259.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mathews, D.J.H., Bok, H. (2015). Brain Research on Morality and Cognition. In: Clausen, J., Levy, N. (eds) Handbook of Neuroethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_133
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_133
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4706-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4707-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law