Skip to main content

Comparison Between Traditional, Lime Based, and Industrial, Dry Mortars

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Historic Mortars

Part of the book series: RILEM Bookseries ((RILEM,volume 7))

Abstract

This contribution faces the problem of choosing, preparing and applying render mortars to be used in restoration and repair of historic buildings. The results obtained in this work clearly show that some industrial “dry mortar” products, even if they are not based on slaked lime binders, can be compatible with traditional, lime based ones, with regard to mechanical and physical properties and, therefore, should have a comparable behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Malinowsky, R.: Durable Ancient Mortars and Concretes. Nordic Concrete Research, Publication No. 1, pp. 1–22, Nordic Concrete Federation (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vitruvius, P.: The Ten Books on Architecture (trans. Morgan, M.H.). Dover Publications, New York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Newsom, S., Gibbons, P., Brown, S.: External Lime Coatings on Traditional Buildings, TAN 15. Historic Scotland, Edinburgh (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holmström, I.: The use of lime. In: Ward, J.D.D., Maxwell, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the Historic Scotland Lime Conference, Lime News, vol. 4, pp. 48–63, Edinburgh (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gibbons, P.: Preparation and Use of Lime Mortars, Historic Scotland Technical Advice Note 1, revised edn. Historic Scotland, Edinburgh (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. IFS-Bericht.: Kalkmörtel und Kalkfarbe – Gestern, Heute und Morgen?, IFS Tagung, Bericht Nr. 19, 2. erweiterte Auflage, Mainz (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peroni, S., Tersigni, C., Torraca, G., Cerea, S., Forti, M., Guidobaldi, F., Rossi-Doria, P., De Rege, A., Picchi, D., Pietrafitta, F.J., Benedetti, G.: Lime based mortars fort the repair of ancient masonry and possible substitutes. In: Proceedings of Mortars, Cements and Grouts in the Conservation of Historic Buildings. ICCROM, Rome (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elert, K., Rodriguez-Navarro, C., Sebastian-Pardo, E., Hansen, E., Cazalla, O.: Lime mortars for the conservation of historic buildings. Stud. Conserv. 47(1), 62–75 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jornet, A., Romer, A.: Lime mortars: relationship between composition and properties, CD. In: Proceedings of the Historical Mortars Conference, Lisbon (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jornet, A., Cavallo, G., Mosca, C.: Lime mortars with mineral additions: properties, CD. In: Proceedings of the 12th Euroseminar on Microscopy Applied to Building Materials, Dortmund (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. UNI EN 459-1: Calci da costruzione – Definizioni, specifiche e criteri di conformità, Milano (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. UNI EN 1015-2: Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry – Part 2, Bulk Sampling of Mortars and Preparation of Test Mortars, Milano (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. UNI EN 1015-3: Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry – Part 3, Determination of Consistence of Fresh Mortar (by Flow Table), Milano (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. UNI EN 1015-7: Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry – Part 7, Determination of Air Content of Fresh Mortar, Milano (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. UNI EN 1015-6: Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry – Part 6, Determination of Bulk Density of Fresh Mortar, Milano (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. UNI EN 1015-11: Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry – Part 11, Determination of Flexural and Compressive Strength of Hardened Mortar, Milano (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. DIN 52617: Bestimmung des Wasseraufnahmekoeffizienten von Baustoffen, Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. SIA 262/1 Annexe A: Perméabilité à l’eau, Construction en Béton – Spécifications complémentaires, Société suisse des ingénieurs et des architectes, Zurich (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. UNI EN 12572: Hygrothermal Performance of Building Materials and Products – Determination of Water Vapour Transmission Properties, Milano (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. UNI EN 998-1: Specification for Mortar for Masonry – Rendering and Plastering Mortar, Milano (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hughes, J., Válek, J.: Mortars in Historic Buildings – Literature Review. Historic Scotland, Edinburgh (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Groot, C.J.W., Bartos, P.J.M., Hughes, J.J.: Historic mortars: characteristics and tests – concluding summary and state-of-the-art. In: Proceedings of RILEM International Workshop, Paisley, pp. 443–454, (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the technical staff of the Institute of Materials and Constructions and in particular R. Bucellari who has been the driving force for laboratory and practical work. Thanks are also due to the direction of our department which has facilitated the construction of the testing wall. We kindly acknowledge the Swiss National Science Foundation for the funding of our 3 year research project within the framework of DORE (13DPD3-116016/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Jornet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 RILEM

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jornet, A., Mosca, C., Cavallo, G., Corredig, G. (2012). Comparison Between Traditional, Lime Based, and Industrial, Dry Mortars. In: Válek, J., Hughes, J., Groot, C. (eds) Historic Mortars. RILEM Bookseries, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4635-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4635-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4634-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4635-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics